I assume since you appeared once in court and requested an adjournment, that it was granted as being a "pre-emptory" adjournment...that means this is your 1 adjurrnment and the trial WILL be going ahead on the next date, with, or without, you. That is the way I always agreed to any adjournment requests. Too many disputants try to play games...and it has beed discussed right here on this bb before..I'm not saying that you are. I have never seen a request for another adjournment granted as both sides get only 1...however I suggest that you contact the dispute process and see what they will do. With the backlog problems and officer availability...????? They might say that you had advance notice of some ? months to make sure you were available and you were told that it MUST go ahead on that date. Can't you get a rewrite date for your exam ? They may just say that you agreed to the date, were told that it WAS going then and it was up to you to live up to the decision?...or they may grant you another adjournment? Worth asking them .