Entertainment Forum THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
Entertainment District
Members' movie reviews, Trailers, TV show post-discussions. Warning: Absolutely, do not post links to pirated or illegal download sites! |
 | | 
05-13-2009, 09:53 PM
|
#51 | | MOD
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: VANCOUVER
Posts: 26,849
Thanked 7,553 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
i said i wouldn't watch it, but i got suckered into watching it and it was pretty good.
| 
|  | |
05-14-2009, 08:55 AM
|
#52 | | I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,316
Thanked 212 Times in 79 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68  This movie was like Star Wars with Star Trek characters. | um...not really.
__________________
....
| |
| | |
05-14-2009, 11:03 AM
|
#53 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,424
Thanked 95 Times in 65 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 This movie was like Star Wars with Star Trek characters. | Quote:
Originally Posted by stuff99 um...not really. | Exactly.
This is a very geek thing to say....but i am gonna say it anyways.
Star Trek and Star Wars, (i guess by coincidence) is in fact the same conflict we've seen for centuries....which is Science vs. Religion.
And its easy to sum up....Star Trek is to Science as Star Wars is to Religion. Both of them complete far fetched fantasies which support science/religion is the most powerful knowledge in the universe.
And for those who know their history, whoever read 'Angels and Demons,' or just watch cable television.....knows that Science and Religion have never ever got along.
This is the reason why a Star Trek follower will always be a 'Trekkie,' and a Star Wars follower will always be a 'Jedi Nerd.'
Its a present-day version for virgins about the whole Science vs. Religion discussion.
| |
| | |
05-14-2009, 11:08 AM
|
#54 | | I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,316
Thanked 212 Times in 79 Posts
|
But I like Star Wars and Star Trek haha
__________________
....
| |
| | |
05-14-2009, 11:13 AM
|
#55 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,424
Thanked 95 Times in 65 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by stuff99 But I like Star Wars and Star Trek haha | Hey....if you ever went to a catholic school like i did, they do teach science too!!
But if you do bad in that class...the priest holds you after school to have a 'Special Baptism.'
From what i recall from my own baptismal pictures, people wore pants during baptism....  | |
| | |
05-15-2009, 12:53 AM
|
#56 | | Need my Daily Fix of RS
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 240
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
|
The sequel needs to happen NOAAA!! or JT Kirk in me NOAAA!!
| |
| | |
05-15-2009, 01:01 AM
|
#57 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,468
Thanked 845 Times in 245 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy | bitch is fine as a muhfucka
| |
| | |
05-15-2009, 06:33 AM
|
#58 | | Chinese Guy, Swedish Rides
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In da GV-ehhhh
Posts: 11,821
Thanked 611 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sexyflanders The sequel needs to happen NOAAA!! or JT Kirk in me NOAAA!! | You meant, 'NAO,' no? 
I still laugh at the fact that Winona Ryder is Spock's mum.  | |
| | |
05-15-2009, 09:39 AM
|
#59 | | Need my Daily Fix of RS
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 240
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by +Kardboard+ You meant, 'NAO,' no?
I still laugh at the fact that Winona Ryder is Spock's mum. | LOL oops! I'm still quite new to the internetspeak ><
| |
| | |
05-15-2009, 10:42 AM
|
#60 | | Chinese Guy, Swedish Rides
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In da GV-ehhhh
Posts: 11,821
Thanked 611 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sexyflanders LOL oops! I'm still quite new to the internetspeak >< | You have much to learn, young one.
I, on the other hand, might just be hitting up Burger King for some Star Trek glasses and Kids' Meal toys. Huzzah.
| |
| | |
05-15-2009, 11:09 AM
|
#61 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
|
Watch out for the Kingons!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
05-15-2009, 04:48 PM
|
#62 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 356 Times in 170 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by +Kardboard+ I, on the other hand, might just be hitting up Burger King for some Star Trek glasses and Kids' Meal toys. Huzzah. | I already got the Enterprise, Kelvin, shuttle, and younger Spock. It made me realize just how rare Burger King has gotten in the Vancouver area. The one on North Road between Burnaby and Coquitlam is gone, the one downtown on Granville is gone, and now the one on Main St. near Science World is gone.
| |
| | |
05-15-2009, 04:55 PM
|
#63 | | Chinese Guy, Swedish Rides
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In da GV-ehhhh
Posts: 11,821
Thanked 611 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jlo mein I already got the Enterprise, Kelvin, shuttle, and younger Spock. It made me realize just how rare Burger King has gotten in the Vancouver area. The one on North Road between Burnaby and Coquitlam is gone, the one downtown on Granville is gone, and now the one on Main St. near Science World is gone. | You are frakking kidding me!!!! Where did they go?!  | |
| | |
05-15-2009, 09:39 PM
|
#64 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 356 Times in 170 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by +Kardboard+ You are frakking kidding me!!!! Where did they go?! | No idea, but i don't see the sign there anymore where the Main St/Science World location used to be. I guess they folded due to the attraction of the McDonald's close by. I believe the only Burger Kings remaining are Hastings near the PNE, Metrotown foodcourt (last Saturday told me they didn't have toys), Surrey near Central City on King George Hwy, and a few others in Surrey, Richmond, and Langley I think.
| |
| | |
05-16-2009, 01:00 AM
|
#65 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,189
Thanked 1,699 Times in 446 Posts
|
I just got home from watching this movie. Holy crap. I had a smile on my face the entire way through. Good shit.
And Simon Pegg is awesome.
| |
| | |
05-16-2009, 04:02 PM
|
#66 | | Chinese Guy, Swedish Rides
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In da GV-ehhhh
Posts: 11,821
Thanked 611 Times in 203 Posts
|  EDIT: I wanna Saldana. | |
| | |
05-16-2009, 10:40 PM
|
#67 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 356 Times in 170 Posts
|
FYI I drove down Main St. and the Burger King is still there. The sign is obscured from several new buildings near it so its only visible when you get close.
| |
| | |
05-17-2009, 12:21 AM
|
#68 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,054
Thanked 62 Times in 23 Posts
|
I don't watch the Star Trek series, but this movie is highly recommended. It's a good movie. I can't wait till the second one comes out!
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 11:21 AM
|
#69 | | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
|
mmmm.... rachel nichols is coming up as scarlett in gi joe. from green skinned to leather tights. her and sienna miller as the baroness should be good.
back on topic, good movie. lots of what seemed like non-stop action. too bad mccoy didn't get a bigger role in the movie. nor did scotty.
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 12:16 PM
|
#70 | | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
|
Apart from the random episode of TNG and DS9 I used to catch on TV while waiting for something better to come on, I've never really watched Star Trek. Well, apart from some of the movies. Anyway, caught this movie this weekend and was absolutely blown away. I'd heard great reviews from both professionals and friends, so I went in expecting great things; luckily, my expectations were fully met. I'm sure if I were an actual Trekkie and followed everything closely I'd have some negative things to say, but since I'm not... I don't care! However, it seemed to explain the alternative timeline pretty well.
I am tempted to go see it again. | |
| | |
05-18-2009, 12:22 PM
|
#71 | | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
|
i used to watch DS9 religiously. only because there was tons more fighting in it due to the jem'hadar war. more interesting than all the exploring and diplomacy nonsense in TNG or the forever-lost Voyager.
Anyway, yeah, the fanboys were pretty upset at some of the changes to the canon. i didn't mind it since i feel this movie is like a rebooting of the series.
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 01:34 PM
|
#72 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by seakrait Anyway, yeah, the fanboys were pretty upset at some of the changes to the canon. i didn't mind it since i feel this movie is like a rebooting of the series. | See, I'm a trekkie (as opposed to Trekker; "Trekker" = ghey) from waaaaay back, and I loved the movie. Canon? Fuck canon. Trek canon has been blown out of the water so many times over the course of 40 years, it's not even funny. It's more shotgun than can(n)on (haw haw, get it?).
The movie was brilliant, especially in that it didn't pretend to to even try to follow canon, yet it gave a nod to it and addressed the very issue of not being able to follow it, pretty much all in one scene. They didn't spend half an hour spewing Treknobabble trying to explain it, they just covered it (without saying outright that they were trying to cover it), and moved on with the story.
That, to me, is genius. Everything in the story that COULD follow the original, did so faithfully. Anything that COULDN'T, they didn't even try... they just told the story. The characters and casting were all spot-on; the actors all paid faithful tribute to the original characters, without trying to copy the original actors.
Frankly, I think everyone involved with making this movie knew exactly how to handle it, and handled it all admirably. It must have been a joy for Nimoy to be a part of it as well.
One thing that had me worried leading up to it, based on the trailers, was the idea that all of the "classic" crew of the Enterprise all knew each other "from the beginning", as this is something that seems to happen a lot in these sort of stories... but they even handled that fairly well, and it didn't bother me at all. About the only thing that seemed a little off was how Scotty got added to the crew, but that was made up for by the "beagle" reference (if you haven't seen it yet, watch for that... it's hilarious).
From a life-long (nearly) Trek fan's perspective, I hereby declare this movie damn near perfect.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" |
Last edited by Soundy; 05-18-2009 at 01:44 PM.
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 03:17 PM
|
#73 | | Chinese Guy, Swedish Rides
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In da GV-ehhhh
Posts: 11,821
Thanked 611 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy See, I'm a trekkie (as opposed to Trekker; "Trekker" = ghey) from waaaaay back, and I loved the movie. Canon? Fuck canon. Trek canon has been blown out of the water so many times over the course of 40 years, it's not even funny. It's more shotgun than can(n)on (haw haw, get it?).
The movie was brilliant, especially in that it didn't pretend to to even try to follow canon, yet it gave a nod to it and addressed the very issue of not being able to follow it, pretty much all in one scene. They didn't spend half an hour spewing Treknobabble trying to explain it, they just covered it (without saying outright that they were trying to cover it), and moved on with the story.
That, to me, is genius. Everything in the story that COULD follow the original, did so faithfully. Anything that COULDN'T, they didn't even try... they just told the story. The characters and casting were all spot-on; the actors all paid faithful tribute to the original characters, without trying to copy the original actors.
Frankly, I think everyone involved with making this movie knew exactly how to handle it, and handled it all admirably. It must have been a joy for Nimoy to be a part of it as well.
One thing that had me worried leading up to it, based on the trailers, was the idea that all of the "classic" crew of the Enterprise all knew each other "from the beginning", as this is something that seems to happen a lot in these sort of stories... but they even handled that fairly well, and it didn't bother me at all. About the only thing that seemed a little off was how Scotty got added to the crew, but that was made up for by the "beagle" reference (if you haven't seen it yet, watch for that... it's hilarious).
From a life-long (nearly) Trek fan's perspective, I hereby declare this movie damn near perfect. | You, sir, hit it right on the money and got it all down in an awesome post of great awesomeness. Thanks for that!
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 03:48 PM
|
#74 | | Ricer Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
|
Well I can finally post here cuz I finally saw the movie last night. I avoided thread to avoid spoilers.
I don't think your going to find a bigger fan of Star Trek on RS than myself (I have Star Trek Tattoo's and have been in an episode as a Klingon) and my verdict is 2 Vulcan hand signs up.
The story was fantastic in that you don't have to be a Trek fan to even like the movie. They paid the original its fair share of tributes with awesome one liners at the perfect times. Cast was excellent my only gripe is Chekov (the actor's accent was fucking terrible) but other than that everyone was perfect. All in all the movie was way better than I expected it to be and I will be seeing it again in theaters this week lol.
Anyone else think the Romulans didn't really look all that Romulan? What was with the face tattoo's. There is a fairly solid look of Trek past that they should have followed. It would be like changing the look of Klingons now.
Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
| |
| | |
05-18-2009, 03:59 PM
|
#75 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,424
Thanked 95 Times in 65 Posts
|
Anton Yelchin as Chekov = Young pre-pubescent Borat
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
