REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum

Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2009, 05:11 PM   #1
Retired Traffic Cop
skidmark's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,023
Thanked 115 Times in 66 Posts
Behind the Wheel - Vehicle Impounds

Taking your neighbour's request at face value turned out to be an expensive lesson for Jessica. She had loaned her vehicle to a neighbour and somewhere along the journey the neighbour met up with the police. The neighbour was a vehicle impound candidate because they didn't have a valid driver's license and Jessica was now faced with making an application to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to attempt to have her vehicle returned to her before the end of the impoundment period.

The neighbour was well aware that they were unlicensed because vehicle impoundment does not occur until after the person is convicted of driving without a driver's license and they don't bother to renew.

The officer who stopped the driver was left without a choice because the legislation requires that the impoundment take place.

Discretion may be exercised by the Superintendent who can decide to return the vehicle to the owner before the end of the impoundment period. Stolen vehicles, errors by police or ICBC regarding a driver's status as an impound candidate, or the exercise of due diligence by the owner in loaning the vehicle may be considered. In order to trigger a review, Jessica will be required to pay a fee and complete a document explaining her reasoning.

Being shown what appears to be a valid driver's license may not be enough peace of mind. Many prohibited drivers fail to turn in their licenses as the law requires. Unless you are absolutely certain of the driver's status, it is not a good practice to loan your vehicle.

Reference Links
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??

Learn more at DriveSmartBC
skidmark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 06:19 PM   #2
I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,972
Thanked 181 Times in 127 Posts
Does the law require an officer to impond a vehicle if the registered owner is in the passenger seat and the unlicenced driver is driving? That way the licenced, registered owner would not lose their car.

I still think denying the owner of lawful enjoyment of their vehicle should in itself be illegal.
sebberry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 08:04 PM   #3
RS Peace Officer
zulutango's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,829
Thanked 1,595 Times in 670 Posts
The legislation says "shall impound"...that means MUST. The penalty is against driver and any vehicle he/she is driving, gets impounded...along with any tickets. The fact that the owner is sitting next to him has nothing to do with what happens to the car. As Skidmark has said above, the driver without a DL, or prohibited and without a DL is the bad guy....not the Police. The owner is responsible for insuring only licensed drivers operate his/her vehicle. In your scenario some Cops could consider a VT for the owner for permitting an unlicensed driver to drive.....and I have had many cases where the owner DID know...and they got into attempts to switch drivers while being stopped by me. In those cases I also sent a letter to MVB telling them of the criminal Code attempt by both to obstruct the Police. The unlicensed driver is the person responsible for "denying the owner of lawful enjoyment of their vehicle should in itself be illegal." If the owner knew or did not do there homework, they are also responsible...not the Cops.
zulutango is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc. cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of