REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum

Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2011, 04:40 AM   #26
RS Peace Officer
zulutango's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,829
Thanked 1,595 Times in 670 Posts
"I realize "intelligence" is beyond some..."

Actually it is beyond Hope....but not quite as far as Spuzzum. If you reach Common Sense you just passed it.
zulutango is online now  
Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-20-2011, 11:16 PM   #27
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: burnaby
Posts: 555
Thanked 34 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Soundy View Post
Look at it this way: if you could pass a mandatory inspection, roll out the door of the facility, and immediately get a *legitimate* VI for something on your car... should that car have passed the mandatory?

How about just, forcing the members to be a little more intelligent in their mods, instead of just slapping whatever ugly conglomeration of cheap rice on their rides?

I realize "intelligence" is beyond some...
I hear ya... but im not necessarily talking about on the spot VIs ( which is fair game). what im saying is that if we have a mandatory vehicle inspection like parts of Europe. Would these mandatory inspections respect after market modifications that are safely installed, like my coilover example.

Now ofcourse if i decided to tack on "rice" after the inspection, VIs are acceptable. What this does I guess to some degree is discourage unsafe "ricing" of vehicles as it just becomes a hassle passing the 'annual mandatory inspection'. Obviously there will be the hardcore dont give a shit ricers out there.

My point about all this is, if madatory inspections are implemented, then lawmakers should embrace change and accept that personalizing a vehicle is a norm these days, from basic wheel change to more advance modifications.

as long as they are installed properly and dont compromise safety.

by that I mean, you can have sweet rims, but just dont run 195s on 10 inches and -5 camber lol..
focus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 11:19 PM   #28
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: burnaby
Posts: 555
Thanked 34 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by baggdis300 View Post
uhh dude, the rule for height is that no part of the car can be lower than the lowest part of the rim..
therefore its pretty HARD to get your car lower than your rims(not tire, but rim)
hmm good to know, i was not aware of that..
focus is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc. cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of