Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only. | |
05-03-2011, 10:39 AM
|
#1 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
| Question for the officers: "corrupt cops" right? Not really...
A friend of mine made an interesting comment the other day: she said "all cops are corrupt" based on the idea that "anytime they give someone a warning instead of a ticket, they're not enforcing the law, and are thus corrupt".
I'm pretty sure she was speaking somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but it made me wonder: IS there actually provision in the MVA/MVAR that allows a cop to use his (or her) discretion on whether to actually give a warning rather than a ticket, or is it more of an "unwritten policy"?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
05-03-2011, 11:38 AM
|
#2 | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
|
The legislation usually works the other way around, with some sections specifying an action that the officer must take. This removes the officer's discretion in the circumstances. The system does provide for the use of discretion otherwise, and Crown Counsel does the same thing when presented with a police report. Diversion is another acceptable method of dealing offenders, which is where I was able to put together a business case for trading a ticket for driver training. (I still think that it is too bad that didn't fly...).
Of course, when it is illegal, immoral or not in the public interest to apply discretion, the officer could be in trouble for doing so.
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC |
| |
05-03-2011, 04:45 PM
|
#3 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
|
Thanks for the clarification! What I was really thinking about was this: Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmark The system does provide for the use of discretion otherwise, and Crown Counsel does the same thing when presented with a police report. Diversion is another acceptable method of dealing offenders, which is where I was able to put together a business case for trading a ticket for driver training. (I still think that it is too bad that didn't fly...) | Is this provision actually "official" and in writing? Specifically, something that I could back with (not necessarily a section number, unless there is one) that states outright that the officer is allowed this discretion.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
05-03-2011, 07:08 PM
|
#4 | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
|
I was taught to "enforce the law with discretion". To charge everybody with every single possible charge would create, to quote Mr Lahey...."a S**t Tsunami" that would submerge the entire legal system. Even giving someone a couple of charges on the same VT would raise eyebrows and I would be asked to justify a "home run" VT. BTW..."discretion" can cut both ways...it cal also mean that all possible charges can be laid. I had a number of clients that I began initially considering lesser charges, end up finding the dark side of discretion. Even had a few that I had planned verbal or written warnings, talk themselves into lot$ of expen$ive paperwork.
Section 251 dealing with impoundments says..
f) has committed an offence under
(i) section 194 (1) or (2), or
(ii) section 25 (15) by violating a requirement, restriction or condition prescribed under section 25 in relation to a driver's licence that allows the person to drive or operate a motorcycle, which requirement, restriction or condition is specified in the regulations for the purposes of this provision,
the peace officer or another peace officer must
(g) cause the motor vehicle to be taken to and impounded at a place directed by the peace officer, and
(h) if paragraph (c) of this subsection applies, serve on the person a notice of driving prohibition in the form established by the superintendent
Last edited by zulutango; 05-03-2011 at 07:15 PM.
|
| |
05-06-2011, 12:24 AM
|
#5 | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 933
Thanked 288 Times in 152 Posts
|
Do cops have quotas to fill? Like give X tickets in a day or anything similar?
|
| |
05-06-2011, 06:33 AM
|
#6 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
|
THAT has been answered here many times, by all the participating officers: NO.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
05-06-2011, 09:10 PM
|
#7 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gearshifter Do cops have quotas to fill? Like give X tickets in a day or anything similar? | No. Never.
Oh, wait... http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...ket-quota.html
And Pg. 79: http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/police_ser...valleyirsu.pdf: Quote:
They also needed to maintain a minimum amount violation ticket output which sometimes required going to locations not
specified as ‘high crash sites’ to obtain a higher volume of violation tickets. These were
termed, “fishing holes”.
| |
| |
05-07-2011, 07:01 AM
|
#8 | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sebberry No. Never. Oh, wait... | Well, the first link is for LAPD. I've never worked for them.
The second link is for Fraser Valley IRSU, ditto.
The only quota that I have been subject to is a minimum of 6 impaired drivers per year. The only complaint I've heard about that is the quota wasn't high enough....
With the number of violators out there, meeting any quota wouldn't be a stretch.
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC |
| |
05-15-2011, 05:36 PM
|
#9 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: burnaby
Posts: 555
Thanked 34 Times in 3 Posts
|
im sure VPD traffic has quotas... lets not be naive.
|
| |
05-16-2011, 07:45 AM
|
#10 | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
|
Yeh....kinda like "air Miles"...except it involves blue pieces of paper instead of a blue credit card. |
| | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 PM. |