REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2011, 08:54 AM   #1
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 73
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Which lense to use to portrait slender legs?

.............
Advertisement

Last edited by FX35; 08-01-2011 at 06:48 PM.
FX35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 09:34 AM   #2
YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
 
CP.AR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL400
Posts: 5,865
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
LENS

and to be honest those pictures look like they were stretched out in editing or something...
like the second picture with the girl and the red shoes - if you have legs like that you are going to die.

other than that. if you want to make legs look longer, your camera should be below waist level, looking UP. as per lenses... I'll let the other guys chime in
__________________
Where the hell am I
CP.AR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 10:54 AM   #3
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Those look like they're shot with a wide angle - they don't really look that stretched in post.

But it doesn't look like an ultra-wide - so probably just a regular 17mm (on a crop body) or like 24mm on a FF.

Portraits aren't usually done at that focal length because the distortion usually makes the face look weird - but if it's long legs you really want, then go for it.
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 11:13 AM   #4
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 73
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Picard View Post
LENS

other than that. if you want to make legs look longer, your camera should be below waist level, looking UP.

Yeah, this I've gathered.

I have been speaking to my friends, and here are things I've been told:

1) 50mm is ideal for shooting facia and upper half body portraits
2) 85mm is ideal for shooting full body portraits
3) Sample photos I've posted here have distortion, possibly generated from software
4) Sample photos were taken with wide angle lenses


My question is, out of the following lenses, which one (s) should I get, in order to achieve the effect in the samples?


Wide-Angle:
AF DX Fisheye-NIKKOR 10.5mm f/2.8G ED
AF NIKKOR 14mm f/2.8D ED
AF Fisheye-NIKKOR 16mm f/2.8D
AF NIKKOR 20mm f/2.8D
AF-S NIKKOR 24mm f/1.4G ED
AF NIKKOR 24mm f/2.8D
AF NIKKOR 28mm f/2.8D
AF-S NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4G
AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G
AF NIKKOR 35mm f/2D

Standard:
AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G
AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4D
AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D
AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G
FX35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 11:17 AM   #5
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 73
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gars View Post
Those look like they're shot with a wide angle - they don't really look that stretched in post.

But it doesn't look like an ultra-wide - so probably just a regular 17mm (on a crop body) or like 24mm on a FF.

Portraits aren't usually done at that focal length because the distortion usually makes the face look weird - but if it's long legs you really want, then go for it.


I indeed need to achieve long legs, as the models will be shot from ground upwards, focusing on legs and rear assets. (nature of the job)

What do you think of AF NIKKOR 24mm f/2.8D?

What is FF? Fixed Focal? Sorry, my knowlege re: photography is very limited.
FX35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 12:38 PM   #6
My homepage has been set to RS
 
77civic1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,279
Thanked 1,263 Times in 300 Posts
FF = Full frame

With the amount off distortion shown in most of those pics, I'd say its closer to a 17mm on a full frame, or about a 10-12mm on a crop body

Do you have any of the original files? you may be able to just look at the exif info on the shots and see for sure what was used
__________________
flickr
77civic1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 12:38 PM   #7
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 4,896
Thanked 4,735 Times in 812 Posts
lol. i found this on Twitter : https://twitter.com/#!/beautylegs

what's in these huge downloads? doesn't look like porn.


i don't get why you know so little about photography though? it's your job? huh?


btw, they look like stills taken from HD video.
__________________
now what?

Last edited by N.V.M.; 08-01-2011 at 12:45 PM.
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 01:00 PM   #8
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 73
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77civic1200 View Post
FF = Full frame

With the amount off distortion shown in most of those pics, I'd say its closer to a 17mm on a full frame, or about a 10-12mm on a crop body

Do you have any of the original files? you may be able to just look at the exif info on the shots and see for sure what was used

I'll research anyway, but for now, please briefly explain Full Frame & Crop Body?

I don't have the original files. If you Google Beautyleg, you'll find results aplenty. 1 of my client wishes to achieve this type of (slightly distored) effect for visually longer legs, hence this post.
FX35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 01:04 PM   #9
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 73
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.V.M. View Post
lol. i found this on Twitter : https://twitter.com/#!/beautylegs

what's in these huge downloads? doesn't look like porn.


i don't get why you know so little about photography though? it's your job? huh?


btw, they look like stills taken from HD video.


Up until recently, I've been more into cars than photography (hence posting on RS here). I've always liked automotive photography, but never really spent the time / money / energy into this realm.

Lately I am required to be invovled in shooting contents with specific styles as per samples provided above.

I am not sure if these are stills taken from a HD video, considering the original photos are sized at 3000 x 2000.
FX35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net