REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2012, 05:51 PM   #1
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
slicrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 812
Thanked 1,233 Times in 266 Posts
2014 Silverado/Sierra










"All-new designs - inside and out
All-new engines based on the Gen V V-8 (4.3L V-6, 5.3L V-8, and 6.2L V-8)
The frame is fundamentally the same as the GMT-900 frame, however portions of it have been modified for added strength and modest weight savings
There is only one interior option on both trucks, unlike today's two
The new 4.3L V-6 will be available in any cab or trim configuration
Both trucks will feature the latest Chevy MyLink and GMC IntelliLink infotainment systems - with REAL BUTTONS
Length of the crew cab doors has been increased by about two inches
Crew cab buyers can now opt for a 6.5-foot bed, a new wheelbase for GM
All engines, including the V-6, have: direct fuel injection, variable valve timing and Active Fuel Management
Z71 now includes Rancho shocks, skid plates and an auto locking rear differential
Four-wheel disc brakes are standard on all trims, and are coated with Duralife"

I found that on GMinsidenews

Your opinion on the next generation GM trucks? I really like the Silverado, The Sierra is nice also but I think the Silverado looks much better especially if you can get one with less chrome.
Advertisement
slicrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 05:57 PM   #2
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
pintoBC_3sgte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 1,793
Thanked 961 Times in 244 Posts
I like the Sierra better. although I'm biased since I own one, but I think the body and interior looks better.
I'll be up for a new truck in about 4 years so maybe the new look will grow on me? I actually think the 2012 interior looks WAY better then the 2014 model
pintoBC_3sgte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:01 PM   #3
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
I've always liked the Sierra. However, that new interior...
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:10 PM   #4
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
pintoBC_3sgte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 1,793
Thanked 961 Times in 244 Posts
Ya don't know what they were thinking on the 2014...

my 2012 interior.
pintoBC_3sgte is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 06:12 PM   #5
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
I prefer the interior of the Silverado to the Sierra, and functionally speaking, they both look great. Aesthetically though, it's just very awkward feeling, especially compared to the previous gens. Overall though, the Dodge Ram Laramie Longhorn has the best interior looking in the full-size truck class.

The exteriors of both the Silverado and Sierra are excellent, and they are my hands down favourites of all the full-size trucks. Ford goes through radical exterior redesigns frequently, Dodge also makes pretty significant changes albeit well executed, but Chevy and GMC only make very nice subtle tweaks so the trucks age very well.

The 4.3L V6 is rumored to beat out the Ford EcoBoost in every respect, except maybe modification ability since it lacks turbos; more torque, more horsepower, better fuel efficiency, and fewer parts to break or wear out.

Last edited by MindBomber; 12-27-2012 at 09:34 PM.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:12 PM   #6
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
slicrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 812
Thanked 1,233 Times in 266 Posts
I wonder when exactly they will be delivered to dealer's, when I worked for GM as a lot boy a year ago they had a few Volt's at least a month or so before the release date to show the salesmen how to use them etc, and hid them under car covers and also barricaded them in with other cars in the back of the lot so nobody could see
slicrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:25 PM   #7
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 1,100 Times in 259 Posts
Interior is way to busy
__________________
Current
2010 Mustang GT 4.6
1998 S10 2.2
Previous
1977 Firebird 5.7
1987 Iroc-Z 2.5
1998 Firebird 3.8
1992 BMW 325i 2.5
1994 Dodge Ram 5.2
1996 Dodge Ram 5.9
1996 Cavalier Z22 2.2
1997 Mustang Cobra 4.6
firebird79_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:47 PM   #8
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
donjalapeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Guadalajara
Posts: 4,763
Thanked 5,613 Times in 1,255 Posts
meh to both...

the only truck i would ever buy is this...

Tundra would come a close second





dat hemi sound
donjalapeno is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 07:31 PM   #9
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
E-40six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 13,418
Thanked 1,421 Times in 273 Posts
Hopefully, with the new sierra/silverado GM will release a 4500/5500 class 4/5 truck based on the sierra/silverado cab like Ford and Dodge are doing
__________________

Acura Integra Type R 00-1004 - It's back
223whp 161ft tq 2.0L ITR


My Feedback
E-40six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 07:41 PM   #10
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
slicrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 812
Thanked 1,233 Times in 266 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfGang View Post
meh to both...

the only truck i would ever buy is this...

Tundra would come a close second
I am sure for most half tonne buyers they wouldn't ever push their trucks this hard and if I had a truck I wouldn't really use it any different than my car I don't have any trailers or stuf like that, and I am not trying to defend any other brand but just look at this and it kind of does look biased towards Ford because Mike Rowe or whoever that is

those were 2009 MY trucks maybe they have addressed and or fixed that problem but if not otherwise I do like the Tundra

Last edited by slicrick; 12-27-2012 at 07:41 PM. Reason: forgot end of post
slicrick is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 08:17 PM   #11
Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
 
vantrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 337
Thanked 224 Times in 84 Posts
Would be nice if these half-tons had diesel engine options, a nice 3 liter would be more than enough. I borrowed a friends sierra 5.3L and I struggled to get 300kms on a tank in the city. Can't imagine driving that everyday.
vantrip is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 08:24 PM   #12
I have named my kids VIC and VLS
 
Hondaracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 36,404
Thanked 14,316 Times in 5,636 Posts
new front ends look fucking sick, never really been a chevy guy myself but the newer body styles are growing on me

however, the fucking truck Guage cluster/AC etc have been the same for the last like 15 years! lol
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
Hondaracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:42 PM   #13
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Yodamaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 1,356
Thanked 1,532 Times in 479 Posts
That thing looks like shit inside and out, and if the 4.3 is anything like the one in my S10, STAY THE FUCK AWAY.
Yodamaster is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 09:19 PM   #14
Banned By Establishment
 
Gridlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
I've never liked the Chev/GMC trucks. I always preferred the Dodge or even the Ford.

I do agree with MindBomber that they age well for not having radical styling changes, but that new interior is a step back in terms of an "upgrade".
Gridlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:23 PM   #15
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
The Chevy engines seem to be lagging behind, Where's the EcoBoost competitor? The 5.3 only makes 320HP, The equivilant ford 5.0 makes 360HP... I'm not biased, The family all own Chevy's, We used to own (all bought new) a 94 suburban, An 00 Suburban, and an 06 Suburban, They were all sluggish and didnt like to work hard. However, With that said, They were incredibly reliable, And AMAZING in deep (2+feet) of snow. I guess the jury's out on the Ford's reliability. (We've only owned the '12 F150 for 3 months now)
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:40 PM   #16
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodamaster View Post
That thing looks like shit inside and out, and if the 4.3 is anything like the one in my S10, STAY THE FUCK AWAY.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dared3vil0 View Post
The Chevy engines seem to be lagging behind, Where's the EcoBoost competitor? The 5.3 only makes 320HP, The equivilant ford 5.0 makes 360HP... I'm not biased, The family all own Chevy's, We used to own (all bought new) a 94 suburban, An 00 Suburban, and an 06 Suburban, They were all sluggish and didnt like to work hard. However, With that said, They were incredibly reliable, And AMAZING in deep (2+feet) of snow. I guess the jury's out on the Ford's reliability. (We've only owned the '12 F150 for 3 months now)
Excerpt from an article on the new engines.

The 4.3L isn't the old 350 with 2 cylinders chopped off anymore.

Quote:
With trucks, what really matters is capability. GM is pushing very hard to make the 2014 trucks the most capable half tons on the market. Specifically the company is expecting to have best in class V-6 torque, best in class V-6 towing and the most capable V-8 in the segment with the 6.2-liter V-8.

All three of those goals are likely feasible, at least until the competition one-up’s them. GM is rolling out an entire new line of engines in the trucks: a 4.3-liter V-6, 5.3-liter V-8 and a 6.2-liter V-8. While the displacements are the same as today, these new engines share only a handful of part numbers with today’s engine lineup. For all intents and purposes, these are all-new powertrains.

GMI recently drove engineering test trucks with the 4.3-liter V-6 and 5.3-liter V-8. While we cannot discuss our driving impressions because the trucks were engineering testers, we can confirm that the 4.3-liter V-6 feels nothing like todays. In fact, we’d slot it up there with today’s 4.8-liter V-8 in terms of how it “feels.”

As for the new 5.3-liter, well, we’ll just say that it feels more powerful than today’s version. Both engines also go into V-4 mode more than today’s Vortec engines.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:48 PM   #17
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
GM's horrible interior is back!
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:52 PM   #18
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindBomber View Post
Excerpt from an article on the new engines.

The 4.3L isn't the old 350 with 2 cylinders chopped off anymore.
All good points, BUT if it "feels" like the 4.8, It still would only have ~300hp. Far behind the ecoboost, and WAY far behind in torque. And it's just something personal, but the whole DoD thing feels and sounds like crap when it happens.
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 10:12 PM   #19
I LIKE JDM!!
 
european's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lower Mainland
Posts: 8,008
Thanked 2,175 Times in 715 Posts
I'm not sure how I feel about this. That Interior is.... um.. different?
__________________
When life hands you lemons, you clone those lemons and make.. super lemons! - Principal Cinnamon J. Scudworth

YouTube
Instagram
flickr
Twitter
Portfolio
european is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 10:24 PM   #20
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
This is how i feel: Ram's interior is the nicest, Ford's truck is the "best" (Opinions again, people, we all can have them) and the Chevy has the best heritage.
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 12:46 AM   #21
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Akinari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,366
Thanked 5,223 Times in 1,388 Posts
The front end looks like it could gobble up a of couple adults.
Akinari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 09:27 AM   #22
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Like the Malibu failure, their brand new truck is already behind the current models from the competition and it won't help that the new f150 is due in mid 2014 and is considered to be a 'game changer'.
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-28-2012, 12:08 PM   #23
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
How could such a bold assessment be made when GM, crucially, has not released engine information aside from displacement offerings?

The 'game-changer' F150 redesign will be interesting to see, but Ford needs to absolutely nail the design for it to be successful and they have a very touch and go history. The axles, brakes, and various other components that are under load are being re-designed to save weight, and thereby increase fuel economy; I definitely wouldn't want to touch the first couple model years of an experiment like that...
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-28-2012, 12:53 PM   #24
no
 
jpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: home
Posts: 5,372
Thanked 6,058 Times in 1,222 Posts
the hemi rams haul ass too, driven couple before and it can whoop some ass
jpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 10:52 PM   #25
straight from the fields of squamton
 
1990TSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 11,286
Thanked 576 Times in 201 Posts
it's no F-150
__________________
2013 Mazdaspeed 3
1990TSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net