Originally Posted by vafanculo
I dunno ... I rather its a 63 year old guy with old school mentality who feels he was wrongfully done by translink, then some 20 somethink punk who just thinks 'translink sucks because prices are rising and service stops at 1am ' type of mentality.
Curiuos why this guy did it. Maybe he was let go or something.
Posted via RS Mobile
I would much rather a 20 something punk do this,cause a judge can make him pay for the damages during the course of his life.
A 63 year old fucktard like this guy who takes public transit to get around,more than likely has no money and will cry foul to the judge about his financial situation and use his age as a excuse to get out of paying for the damages.