REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum

Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2013, 03:58 PM   #26
RS Peace Officer
zulutango's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,829
Thanked 1,595 Times in 670 Posts
I bet if he asked a Traffic Member he would have gotten a different reply. Asking a GD Member about traffic is like asking a dentist about a brain operation....and I should know as my wife is a dental nurse.

Last edited by zulutango; 07-29-2013 at 08:14 PM.
zulutango is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 04:24 PM   #27
The Lone Wanderator
Graeme S's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,089
Thanked 4,367 Times in 1,137 Posts
Originally Posted by wonton1017 View Post
The best part is that having an eyelid installed INSIDE of your headlights is perfectly fine. My friend with a BMW E92 made custom gunmetal eyelids inside of his headlights to imitate the new F30/F32 headlights. He told multiple (5+) police officers to look at his headlights and tell him if anything is illegal with it and they all say nope.

That being said, this makes zero sense because if you put it on the OUTSIDE, it is SHIELDING THE HOUSING (which is "illegal" according to the officer). But if you put it on the INSIDE, it is NOT SHIELDING THE HOUSING. But in reality, they are both in the exact same spot except one is on the lens' exterior and the other is on the lens' interior. (millimeters of difference in location)
To be fair, I'd wager that most cops wouldn't normally expect to be looking inside a headlight for modification. I would wager that your friend's modification is no more legal than any others', simply more surreptitious ("less heaty", for those of you who prefer the modern slang). And while we're on the subject, I do believe the modification would be counted as 'obscured', whether it's from the inside or out.
Graeme S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 09:17 PM   #28
I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,972
Thanked 181 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by zulutango View Post
So with all that is wrong with society and the legal system today, you want to spend time, money and effort to change legislation to permit people to install unauthorized, untested covers over the headlight assembly? Hmmmmmmmm?
How about regulations that aren't so outdated that they force people to clog up courts trying to defend their innocence?

Nah, let's proceed with the status quo as we continue down the path to moving traffic disputes to phone calls with SMV staff rather than in front of an impartial JP.
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement:

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 09:28 PM   #29
Soundy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,658
Thanked 12,085 Times in 3,335 Posts
Originally Posted by sebberry View Post
How about regulations that aren't so outdated that they force people to clog up courts trying to defend their innocence?

Nah, let's proceed with the status quo as we continue down the path to moving traffic disputes to phone calls with SMV staff rather than in front of an impartial JP.
So how are you going to re-write the legislation? Because no matter how you word it, you still need to limit what people can do so they're not turning their cars into rolling hazards... and no matter how carefully you word it, the people who just want to flaunt the laws will continue to push the boundaries, and clog up the courts trying to defend themselves.

Allow people to put 3mm of "eyelids" on, and the people with a point to prove will go to 4mm, just so they can complain about "the man" trying to put them down.

Same thing with things like front tint - allow 75%, and the clowns will be going to 65% and then complaining, "I don't see the difference, it's only 10%! You can't even tell by looking!"

Doesn't matter where you draw the line in the sand, the jokers are always out there wanting to put a toe over it... then two toes... and if they get away with that, the whole foot. So it becomes easier - and just more efficient and cost-effective - to put up a fence instead.

And then Sebberry can come along and complain that the fence is "violating his rights" to see that line. Or some kind of crazy hippie shit like that.

So tell you what: instead of whining about the laws that are designed to keep everyone safe (perfect or not)... why don't you go after the self-centered assholes who make it necessary to HAVE those laws in the first place? THEY'RE the reason we can't have nice things.
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline  
Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc. cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of