| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
08-28-2013, 03:46 AM
|
#26 | | y'all better put some respeck on my name
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,225
Thanked 9,244 Times in 2,359 Posts
|
I've never been a fan of the styling of the GTR but it is one amazing car.
| 
|  | |
08-28-2013, 09:58 AM
|
#27 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher  I just don't get how its possible. Why do cars of a similar weight all need 1000hp to do it? I don't understand how gearing, traction, and aero can mathematically make it happen. 570hp moving a 3800 lb car to 60mph in 2 seconds just doesn't seem possible, even with all the robot driving double clutch transmission tech in the world. | e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! 
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-28-2013, 09:59 AM
|
#28 | | :: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,740
Thanked 11,815 Times in 3,329 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Placid Not an expert myself, but I think you are referring to the AWD's torque differential that transfers power between the front and rear and vice versa.
Making AWD vehicles fun to drive (in a sense anyway) in a straight line AND when cornering. | Power transfer is quick!
__________________
19' Audi TT-RS S tronic w/ RS sport - Glacier White
13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"
00' Acura 1.6EL - // Power of dreams Project - "Unity"
02' Nissan M35 Stagea - "Wynn"
91' Honda EF Civic CX - "Xander"
- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
| |
| | |
08-28-2013, 01:04 PM
|
#29 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! | true, if you ever see a slow camera on how high performance cars launch, there actually is a lot more wheel spin and power loss than you think.
sophisticated launch control will hopefully fix this problem.
Mizuno san also said how efficient GT-R's drive trains are...thus, less power loss.
on a side note...I'm not a physics guy and didn't understand your formula at all
| |
| | |
08-28-2013, 01:10 PM
|
#30 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,077
Thanked 31,141 Times in 7,148 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! | I'm a chef, so I have the math skills of a 4 year old, so I'm just gonna nod my head and thank you, assuming it makes sense.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5 Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever Westopher is correct. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked | Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct. | | |
| | |
08-28-2013, 02:01 PM
|
#31 | | Old School RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,556
Thanked 3,946 Times in 1,202 Posts
|
I don't really understand why this is a thread. This isn't an announcement, a review, or anything other than some random person speculating/dreaming that the 2015 GTR will achieve this. Who the fuck is Viknesh Vijayenthiran?
I realize this is a Timpo thread but this thread has less content than even the average fucking Timpo thread.
Might as well have started this thread:
"2018 Porsche 992 to have 5 wheels"
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars. | |
| | |
08-28-2013, 02:16 PM
|
#32 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lowside67 Who the fuck is Viknesh Vijayenthiran? | Our Writers | High Gear Media | |
| | |
08-28-2013, 02:20 PM
|
#33 | | Old School RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,556
Thanked 3,946 Times in 1,202 Posts
|
Yeah I can Google too. He also comes up for Fox News... super trustworthy! I guess a better question is who is High Gear Media and what does Viknesh know that the rest of the world doesn't about the new GTR?
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars. | |
| | |
08-28-2013, 10:50 PM
|
#34 | | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,295
Thanked 1,934 Times in 494 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 Power transfer is quick! | I double checked some facts about Nissan's AWD system and how the heck it could be faster than cars with the same HP that costs twice as much: Nissan GT-R's Secret - ATTESA E-TS AWD System Explained
Interesting read.
AWD, at least during the initial short-distance drag racing, for Nissan, makes it quicker than many, many cars. Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! | Interesting take.
Just want to add the following:
Only 415hp required?
Did you factor in the power loss from crank to wheels?
And... head-wind speed?
I think it is around 15% to 25% for AWD.
So, 415hp, assuming 25% power loss is:
553hp.
The current GT-R, 2012 model, produces 542hp (crank).
So, the newest rendition proposed by the article's writer should be around 553hp and should be doable, with a little tweak here and there.
| |
| | |
08-28-2013, 10:57 PM
|
#35 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! | Little thing called traction/ Not always being at your exact perfect powerband spot/ time it takes to shift etc etc etc.
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4
2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 08:09 AM
|
#36 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dared3vil0 Little thing called traction/ Not always being at your exact perfect powerband spot/ time it takes to shift etc etc etc. | That's why I specified to the ground, and average 
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 08:15 AM
|
#37 | | Everyone wants a piece of R S...
Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Somewhere
Posts: 360
Thanked 654 Times in 148 Posts
|
Very interesting. There's already a lot of respect for this car and if the GTR can actually hit 60 in 2 then wow, it'll be on a whole new level. I really don't care how they do it, as long as they claim they would then I'm sure they will. Now let's wait and see.
| |
| | |
08-29-2013, 08:18 AM
|
#38 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
|
All that being said, I really, really doubt it will. As others have posted, there is almost no room for losses with those numbers.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:03 AM
|
#39 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Placid I double checked some facts about Nissan's AWD system and how the heck it could be faster than cars with the same HP that costs twice as much: Nissan GT-R's Secret - ATTESA E-TS AWD System Explained
Interesting read.
AWD, at least during the initial short-distance drag racing, for Nissan, makes it quicker than many, many cars.
Interesting take.
Just want to add the following:
Only 415hp required?
Did you factor in the power loss from crank to wheels?
And... head-wind speed?
I think it is around 15% to 25% for AWD.
So, 415hp, assuming 25% power loss is:
553hp.
The current GT-R, 2012 model, produces 542hp (crank).
So, the newest rendition proposed by the article's writer should be around 553hp and should be doable, with a little tweak here and there. | No, it's 10% for GT-R...I've seen Mizuno san (GT-R chief engineer) saying the same thing as well What % Drivetrain Loss? - R35 GT-R - GT-R Life | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:07 AM
|
#40 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp
Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.
Science! | my friend, you are simply calculating the kinetic energy of a 3800 lbs object traveling at a constant 60 mph.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:17 AM
|
#41 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar my friend, you are simply calculating the kinetic energy of a 3800 lbs object traveling at a constant 60 mph. | Yes, yes I am.
And energy is conserved, so the energy required to accelerate an object to that constant speed is equal to the kinetic energy at that speed.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:18 AM
|
#42 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Yes, yes I am.
And energy is conserved, so the energy required to accelerate an object to that constant speed is equal to the kinetic energy at that speed. | in a physics utopia on a frictionless road and in vacuum (no air resistance).
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:23 AM
|
#43 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar in a physics utopia on a frictionless road and in vacuum (no air resistance). | On a frictionless road you wouldn't move. So. No, not that.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:29 AM
|
#44 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
|
Air resistance on a GTR at 60mph:
D = 1/2pV^2*C*A
D = 1/2 * (1.204kg/m^3) * (60mph)^2 * .32 * 6.08ft^2
D = 17.5 pounds
Negligible.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:44 AM
|
#45 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter On a frictionless road you wouldn't move. So. No, not that. | notice I didn't use the term "car". I used the term "object". How it started to move to a constant velocity on a frictionless surface is beyond me. But somehow it did, and your formula is calculating the KE of that object.
I'm not going to go any further into this kinematics debate. This is about the GTR after all. My only point is that you are neglecting a lot of variables (thermodynamics for example) which plays a crucial point. Have you even considered the horsepower wasted in form of heat due to the inefficiency of the engine? For you to say that the GTR has more power than your theoretical 415 hp and claim that it is "doable" for it to achieve 0-60 in 2.0 s is flawed.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:48 AM
|
#46 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar (have you even considered the horsepower wasted in form of heat due to the inefficiency of the engine?) | Yes, I have considered that. And so do the manufacturers of cars when they release horsepower numbers. Horsepower numbers don't include waste heat.
You need to stop having this conversation, you look foolish. I was very specific. Horsepower applied to the road, and average horsepower. Yes, you obviously need higher than 415hp peak to hit that time, that's what average means. All I said is that it was physically possible, not that it was likely or has happened.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 09:57 AM
|
#47 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Yes, I have considered that. And so do the manufacturers of cars when they release horsepower numbers. Horsepower numbers don't include waste heat.
You need to stop having this conversation, you look foolish. I was very specific. Horsepower applied to the road, and average horsepower. Yes, you obviously need higher than 415hp peak to hit that time, that's what average means. All I said is that it was physically possible, not that it was likely or has happened. | Well that just solves everything.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si | |
| | |
08-29-2013, 10:36 AM
|
#48 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
so does this mean that we will start seeing this Nismo GTR here once its released driving by mainlanders thinking they are race car drivers who in fact cant drive and drive like shit then goes to MM design to make it look the part???
back on topic,
cant wait til Top Gear does a review and stig ripping it around their track.. will it beat the Pagani Huayra
| |
| | |
08-30-2013, 02:00 AM
|
#49 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
|
As we know Honda engineers announced that NSX will be faster than the GT-R...they probably were aiming for 2.5 seconds or so but now need to aim for 1.9 seconds LOL
| |
| | |
08-30-2013, 07:23 AM
|
#50 | | Zionism gets my shell hard and slimy
Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: in a shell
Posts: 2,598
Thanked 6,021 Times in 1,129 Posts
|
^ vtec>physics  | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
