REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-04-2013, 09:40 AM   #1
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Acura604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,755
Thanked 2,908 Times in 755 Posts
Honda 1, Nissan -0, Kia -0 - crash test

Small cars perform poorly in crash tests - Video - Personal Finance


The Honda Civic earned top scores in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's new "small overlap" crash test, but similarly sized cars from Kia and Nissan fared poorly.

The Institute put 12 new compact cars through the test, including two- and four-door versions of the Civic and two Kia models. The Kia Soul and Forte, as well as the Nissan Sentra, earned the worst possible rating of "Poor" in the test.

Kia and Nissan both pointed out that their cars have performed very well in other Insurance Institute and government crash tests. Kia also noted that the "small overlap" crash test "goes well beyond federal requirements."

Both automakers said they would review the test results as they seek to make further safety improvements in their cars.


This was the first time compact cars were subjected to this new type of front crash test. In it, the cars are propelled at 40 miles an hour and strike a crash barrier with just one quarter of the front bumper on the driver's side. That concentrates impact forces into a small area that often falls outside crash protection structures built into the cars. The impact also spins the car violently.

The test mimics a type of impact that accounts for nearly a quarter of all front crashes with serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.

"In the worst cases safety cages collapsed, driver airbags moved sideways with unstable steering columns and the dummy's head hit the instrument panel," David Zuby, the Institute's chief research officer, said of the test results in a written statement.

Also, side curtain airbags sometimes didn't deploy or they didn't provide coverage far enough forward in the car to be of any help, he said.

In the case of the two Kia models, the cars' seatbelts spooled out too much, allowing the crash test dummy to move too far forward. At the same time, the side curtain airbags didn't provide protection that far forward in the car, allowing the dummy's head to hit the windshield pillar and instrument panel. The Kias' steel structure also provided insufficient crash protection in the tests, according to the Institute.

When the IIHS put a group of luxury cars through the same test in August, the first time results for the new test were released, only two cars out of 11 got top marks. The Institute has also put mid-sized cars and small SUVs through the new test.

In this case, while only the Civics earned the top possible rating of "Good" in the side impact test, the Dodge Dart, Ford Focus, Hyundai Elantra and Scion tC were rated "Acceptable." That was good enough to earn them, along with the Civic, the Institute's "Top Safety Pick Plus" award. That award is reserved for cars that perform well in all of the Institute's crash safety tests.

The Chevrolet Sonic, Cruze and Volkswagen Beetle earned "Marginal" ratings in the test. The Toyota Corolla wasn't tested because Toyota (TM) will be releasing a completely redesigned Corolla later this month.
Advertisement
Acura604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 09:55 AM   #2
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
i-VTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 911
Thanked 297 Times in 116 Posts
I wonder why they don't do crash test for audi/benz/bmw entry model cars?
__________________
Want2Buy: Nissan 350Z
http://www.revscene.net/forums/68904...ssan-350z.html
i-VTEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 10:05 AM   #3
Zionism gets my shell hard and slimy
 
snails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: in a shell
Posts: 2,598
Thanked 6,021 Times in 1,129 Posts
wonder how my 89 civic would do....

my guess...

snails is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-04-2013, 10:07 AM   #4
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,423
Thanked 14,760 Times in 3,870 Posts
HOME | Euro NCAP - For safer cars crash test safety rating

That's what we should all be looking at before we purchase a new vehicle
Posted via RS Mobile
320icar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 11:19 AM   #5
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
honda rulez
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 12:50 PM   #6
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 858
Thanked 1,070 Times in 229 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by i-VTEC View Post
I wonder why they don't do crash test for audi/benz/bmw entry model cars?
they do.

BMW 3 Series | Euro NCAP - For safer cars crash test safety rating
Shorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net