Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
07-16-2014, 03:15 PM
|
#26 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: y
Posts: 1,331
Thanked 4,841 Times in 632 Posts
|
your wife's insurance policy gets sued as a result of this incident. ICBC "jumps in her shoes" to defend her.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 03:15 PM
|
#27 | reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
|
Is not that hard to fake injuries if you have the time. Just go to the doctors like once or twice a week and keep saying this hurt and that hurt and you can't sleep blah blah blah.
There are lawyers who live on ICBC claims because is easy money.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 03:21 PM
|
#28 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c I thought they can't sue your wife directly since she is covered by ICBC or the insurance company you guys are using? | yeah, just contact ICBC, they will fight against the guy on behalf of your wife.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 03:33 PM
|
#29 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HappySilp Is not that hard to fake injuries if you have the time. Just go to the doctors like once or twice a week and keep saying this hurt and that hurt and you can't sleep blah blah blah.
There are lawyers who live on ICBC claims because is easy money. | Just did a quick Google search Why Frequent Doctor Visits Do Not Increase The Value of Personal Injury Claims | ICBC Personal Injury Claims Lawyer Erik Magraken | Victoria & Vancouver Island BC Why Frequent Doctor Visits Don't Increase The Value Of Personal Injury Claims
As previously discussed, frequent doctor visits in and of themselves add no value to a personal injury claim. Seeing a doctor simply to ‘paper’ a personal injury claim really does nothing to add to the amount of compensation a claimant is entitled to receive not to mention that it creates a costly and unnecessary burden on the medical system. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, demonstrating that medical visits to address ‘inconsequential‘ matters with a view to assisting a personal injury claim are frowned upon.
In this week’s case (Hough v. Wyatt) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2009 collision. He sued seeking over $350,000 in damages. The Court largely rejected the Plaintiff’s claim finding that while the collision did cause some injuries these were little more than a ‘minor degree‘ of aggravation of pre-existing injuries. Non-Pecuniary damages of $15,000 were assessed.
In the course of the judgement Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein had provided the following critical comments: [9] Mr. Hough was a very difficult witness. He is a poor historian, which is understandable given his extensive medical history. However, he bears the burden of proof. He was argumentative, abrasive, sometimes rude, often unresponsive, and many times inconsistent in his evidence. Mr. Hough clearly demonstrates an attitude of entitlement to insurance benefits, at one point indicating he doesn’t understand the problem here, it is only insurance money. He reports everything, no matter how inconsequential, even a broken fingernail, so if there is a problem in the future, he can get compensation. The trouble for Mr. Hough is he was a medical disaster before the accident, and the defendant is not obliged to pay for all that ails him or ailed him. Mr. Hough’s pre-existing medical condition, his original position, as outlined in the evidence of Dr. Waiz, and what Mr. Hough can recall, would have manifested debilitating effects in any event, regardless of the accident. His original condition would have detrimentally affected him even absent the defendant’s negligence. The defendant is not required to compensate him for debilitating effects not caused by the accident…. [14] Dr. Waiz’s evidence is unsatisfactory on many levels, not the least of which his manner in which he managed Mr. Hough’s care with increasing doses of narcotics. His records are unreliable. He blames computer programs and computer generated forms. He has been willing to fill out reports to benefit Mr. Hough, for example, claiming all Mr. Hough’s drugs were WCB-related so Mr. Hough could be compensated, and claiming a wrist fracture was a WCB injury due to ongoing weakness and pain in his right leg. This is the same broken wrist that Mr. Hough now claims was caused by the accident for the same reason. Where it has suited Mr. Hough, Dr. Waiz has reported to WCB Mr. Hough is unable to work in any capacity. Now he was reporting to this court that, because of the accident, Mr. Hough cannot work. The concern is he is parroting what Mr. Hough wants him to say.
While it is true that serious injuries warrant higher damage awards than minor injuries and that serious injuries typically result in more medical appointments, the mere number of doctor’s visits in and of themselves do not assist in valuing a personal injury claim. You can click here for a short discussion addressing the factors Court’s often consider when assessing non-pecuniary damages (money for pain and suffering) in a BC personal injury lawsuit.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 03:34 PM
|
#30 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
|
Here's another one http://bc-injury-law.com/blog/tag/medical-marijuana Frequency of Doctor Visits
The last point of interest deals with the Plaintiff’s frequency of doctor’s visits I have canvassed this topic previously. In this week’s case the Plaintiff pointed to having 128 doctor visits as supporting his claim for injury. The Court, however, found that there was no reasonable justification for this and instead came to the conclusion that the Plaintiff was simply papering his claim. The following observation was made by Justice Sigurdson: [65] Up to June 2012, the plaintiff saw Dr. Irene Chan, a general practitioner, 128 times for his injuries. From July 8, 2008 to June 2012, the complaints he made to her were virtually the same on each occasion. Dr. Chen was not called as an expert witness but testified simply with respect to some of the observations she made… [107] It is difficult to know what to make of the fact that the plaintiff attended his general practitioner for 128 visits and appears to have repeated his symptoms almost without change on each visit. He explained in his testimony that he went to his doctor to report changes in his condition; however his doctor noted each of his attendances with the plaintiff reporting no changes. The evidence left me with the impression that the plaintiff was creating a record of his injuries for his claim as there appears to be no reasonable medical justification for the number of attendances before his family doctor. Rather than supporting his credibility, this evidence of the numerous attendances on his family doctor left me with the opposite impression. |
| |
07-16-2014, 04:00 PM
|
#31 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: BC
Posts: 3,558
Thanked 3,814 Times in 957 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma 4.61 million (Jan 1, 2014)
British Columbia, Population
lol.
3.47million bucks each person eh?
I like that idea. HAH....
edit: i need a new calculator that goes up to 9 digits. | u need a calculator to tell u that ur number clearly made no sense?
|
| |
07-16-2014, 04:52 PM
|
#32 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 36,436
Thanked 14,322 Times in 5,640 Posts
|
moral of the story? When you're gonna hit someone, make it count.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
07-16-2014, 05:12 PM
|
#33 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: D
Posts: 767
Thanked 97 Times in 52 Posts
|
Instead of raising rates. Why doesn't icbc make it cheaper for drivers to purchase insurance if you buy a finevu camera.
This way, any small fender benders would be dismissed as fraud for the claimer.
But we should be proactively putting camera's on are our cars so are family members don't get sued by scammers.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 05:39 PM
|
#34 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: yvr
Posts: 1,326
Thanked 668 Times in 258 Posts
|
Lol, am I the only one that saw the title and went, "F#$%, insurance rates are going up by 26%!!!!"
Then read the article and saw that insurance rates HAD ALREADY gone up by 26% since 2003. Not that it's much better. |
| |
07-16-2014, 06:34 PM
|
#35 | Ready to be Man handled by RS!
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,798
Thanked 1,502 Times in 506 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore They also seem to be more eager to write cars off now than before, but that could just be me. | Quote:
Originally Posted by meme405 I think that might just be due to the fact that cars are built more like disposable razors now, then they were many years ago. | Cars aren't built to be disposable - they're built to be sacrificial. For example, crumple zones are designed to absorb the impact of a collision so the forces applied to passengers are reduced.
Bottom line is cars are replaceable, people are not. Better to have a $30k car thrown away and passengers with minor injuries than a car that's still repairable and a passenger with $100K (or more) in medical bills and on-going physical therapy.
It is unbelievably expensive to "repair" people.
|
| |
07-16-2014, 07:39 PM
|
#36 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,738
Thanked 939 Times in 308 Posts
|
Shouldn't ICBC be a revenue neutral government insurance company?
Why are profits being siphoned out and used in other government expenditures.
Stupid rhetorical question I know...
|
| |
07-16-2014, 07:57 PM
|
#37 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,323
Thanked 2,558 Times in 925 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by v_tec
Y u no include GTR | PLEASE post the picture of the driver sitting on the chair after the crash
|
| |
07-16-2014, 08:10 PM
|
#38 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed2K Lol, am I the only one that saw the title and went, "F#$%, insurance rates are going up by 26%!!!!"
Then read the article and saw that insurance rates HAD ALREADY gone up by 26% since 2003. Not that it's much better. | yes, because no one actually read the article and took the threat title as fact for an easy way to jump into an ICBC shitting thread
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| |
07-16-2014, 10:23 PM
|
#39 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,758
Thanked 688 Times in 375 Posts
|
I never understood why there was a ceiling for discounts. There should be no ceiling so if you're a good driver, you should have the opportunity to be insured for free one day by all the other dumb ass drivers that cause the accidents and claims. Make those people pay more to get their vehicles insured. There should be REAL incentives for people who are claim free. Fuck this 42% discount BS, gimme 100% discount. That's just my opinion.
|
| |
07-17-2014, 11:46 AM
|
#40 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,265
Thanked 8,910 Times in 3,872 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dangonay Cars aren't built to be disposable - they're built to be sacrificial. For example, crumple zones are designed to absorb the impact of a collision so the forces applied to passengers are reduced.
Bottom line is cars are replaceable, people are not. Better to have a $30k car thrown away and passengers with minor injuries than a car that's still repairable and a passenger with $100K (or more) in medical bills and on-going physical therapy.
It is unbelievably expensive to "repair" people. | The same amount of energy is going into the car, so crumple zones or not the car is going to sustain roughly the same amount of damage, the crumple zones just help to ensure that the damage is directed away from the passengers.
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: | |
| |
07-17-2014, 06:14 PM
|
#41 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 768
Thanked 562 Times in 245 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hotjoint I never understood why there was a ceiling for discounts. There should be no ceiling so if you're a good driver, you should have the opportunity to be insured for free one day by all the other dumb ass drivers that cause the accidents and claims. Make those people pay more to get their vehicles insured. There should be REAL incentives for people who are claim free. Fuck this 42% discount BS, gimme 100% discount. That's just my opinion. | lol thats not how insurance work; the point of insurance is to pool and share the risk. There is always a non-zero probability that you might cause an accident as long as you are on the road. 100% discount means others are paying for your risk for free.
|
| |
07-17-2014, 06:19 PM
|
#42 | #deephouse
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,194
Thanked 4,704 Times in 1,243 Posts
|
100% discount , thats not how monopolies work.
__________________ /// x AMG |
| |
07-18-2014, 10:56 PM
|
#43 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
|
I think vehicle black boxes should start tracking accelerometer data. If you want to sue, be prepared to provide the data.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
07-19-2014, 01:05 AM
|
#44 | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,843
Thanked 563 Times in 229 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hotjoint I never understood why there was a ceiling for discounts. There should be no ceiling so if you're a good driver, you should have the opportunity to be insured for free one day by all the other dumb ass drivers that cause the accidents and claims. Make those people pay more to get their vehicles insured. There should be REAL incentives for people who are claim free. Fuck this 42% discount BS, gimme 100% discount. That's just my opinion. | Even if you are not causing any accidents, there are still administrative costs so why would you get a 100% discount?
Regardless, it only takes one costly accident with a payout in the millions to wipe out everything you've ever paid into the system.
__________________
Cars:
02' Lexus IS300 5spd
07' BMW 323iA
05' BMW Z4 5spd
06' BMW 330i 6spd
10' Audi A4 quattro
08' BMW M3 6spd
15' Kawasaki Ninja300
08' Yamaha R6
10' Honda Ridgeline
17' Audi Q5
16' BMW X5D |
| |
07-19-2014, 04:47 AM
|
#45 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20,389
Thanked 7,449 Times in 1,438 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! | I work in the insurance industry, underwriting car insurance is part of my job.
Gold-coloured colloras, SUV are what we highly preferred.
We got Maybach, Bentley, Ferrari, Lambo application all the time, these are the models we send inspectors to check out the car.
|
| |
07-19-2014, 09:06 AM
|
#46 | Everyone wants a piece of R S...
Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: YVR
Posts: 352
Thanked 208 Times in 110 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by FS1992EG Why doesn't icbc make it cheaper for drivers to purchase insurance if you buy a finevu camera. | +1
They already discount for a passive immobilizer, why not discount for a camera if you agree to surrender the video if you make a claim or a claim is made against you?
|
| |
07-19-2014, 09:46 AM
|
#47 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,584
Thanked 4,578 Times in 934 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by FS1992EG Instead of raising rates. Why doesn't icbc make it cheaper for drivers to purchase insurance if you buy a finevu camera.
This way, any small fender benders would be dismissed as fraud for the claimer.
But we should be proactively putting camera's on are our cars so are family members don't get sued by scammers. | Because icbc makes more money when accidents are 50/50 and they can raise both rates.
|
| |
07-19-2014, 02:08 PM
|
#48 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 4,834
Thanked 712 Times in 272 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient_510 +1
They already discount for a passive immobilizer, why not discount for a camera if you agree to surrender the video if you make a claim or a claim is made against you? | How does having cam help icbc save money?
Cam doesn't prevent accidents, and icbc doesn't give a sht who is at fault, as long as someone takes the fault
|
| |
07-19-2014, 02:37 PM
|
#49 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportPsycho How does having cam help icbc save money?
Cam doesn't prevent accidents, and icbc doesn't give a sht who is at fault, as long as someone takes the fault | It depends.
If you hit a kid in school zone today, you'll be in a lot of shit and parents are gonna sue your ass for multi million $$$.
It's even worse if your car is relatively flashy, have exhaust, etc.
Witness are gonna tell ICBC and Police you were driving like a complete idiot, you are going to have a criminal charge for mischief in public, etc.
Trust me, witness will actually tell everyone that you were driving aggressively, surf on Youtube and other car websites, people post videos how single dashcam saved their ass.
It is going to save ICBC a lot of money because your dashcam shows a kid running into the road without even looking and you had absolutely no time to stop within distance.
|
| |
07-19-2014, 02:41 PM
|
#50 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 4,834
Thanked 712 Times in 272 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo It depends.
If you hit a kid in school zone today, you'll be in a lot of shit and parents are gonna sue your ass for multi million $$$.
It's even worse if your car is relatively flashy, have exhaust, etc.
Witness are gonna tell ICBC and Police you were driving like a complete idiot, you are going to have a criminal charge for mischief in public, etc.
Trust me, witness will actually tell everyone that you were driving aggressively, surf on Youtube and other car websites, people post videos how single dashcam saved their ass.
It is going to save ICBC a lot of money because your dashcam shows a kid running into the road without even looking and you had absolutely no time to stop within distance. | I see your point there
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM. |