REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-17-2015, 11:59 AM   #1
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,010
Thanked 1,174 Times in 353 Posts
Retrofit Experiences?

Anyone here get pulled over for having retrofit headlights in their cars?
Anyone here have experiences with getting retrofit HIDs?
Advertisement
AstulzerRZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 12:36 PM   #2
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,629
Thanked 17,579 Times in 4,296 Posts
As long as they are CSA/DOT approved you have nothing to worry about. Make sure they ones you are interested in have those markings you have nothing to worry about.
murd0c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 01:08 PM   #3
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tres Ciudades
Posts: 5,407
Thanked 3,680 Times in 1,522 Posts
my previous two cars had retrofit headlights...drove em around for a few years and never had any issues

i can't remember if they were CSA/DOT but i rmbr i made the effort of properly aiming them
__________________
"There's a lot of dead people who had the right of way."
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
"I have a lot of beliefs, and I live by none of them. They're just my beliefs, they make me feel good about who I am. But if they get in the way of a thing I want, like I wanna jack off or something, I just do that."
6o4__boi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 01:40 PM   #4
Media Officer / MOD
 
!Aznboi128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,073
Thanked 5,751 Times in 1,724 Posts
I've had them on my car for multiple years with no issues
__________________
[NS]NiteShadow
my feedback (128-0-0)
Revscene Automotive Reviews
Quick link to personal reviews -> Website YouTube
Official Revscene Instagram Coordinator
!Aznboi128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 01:44 PM   #5
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c View Post
As long as they are CSA/DOT approved you have nothing to worry about. Make sure they ones you are interested in have those markings you have nothing to worry about.


Not exactly. IF the system you retrofitted....notice I said "System"..including the proper reflectors, lenses, washers, levelling system....are the same as offered by the car manufacturer....AND meet ALL federal standards....then yes, you will have nothing to worry about. If not then you are likely in trouble.

I used to issue #1 notice and order at roadside and tow the vehicle. Just because you might have some approved parts of a complete system, that doesn't make your modded setup safe or legal. You can strap a federally approved motorcycle engine onto a skaterboard...but you don't end up with a legal vehicle. Slapping some aftermarket HID bulbs into a halogen designed reflectror and lens setup ends up with uncontrolled light output that blinds other drivers and you don't have proper light output so you can see properly. I'm sure almost everybody here has been blinded by aftermarket HIDs in some oncoming vehicle at one time or another?
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-17-2015, 01:48 PM   #6
VAC Head Rotang Mod
 
Raid3n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Van
Posts: 10,668
Thanked 1,427 Times in 627 Posts
i believe technically if it wasn't an option offered for your car, any modification to the lighting is illegal.

so it would have to be the projectors from a higher model of your car that has it as a factory option. i don't think retrofitting your headlights falls into this.

-edit-
should have refreshed the page before posting lol
__________________
2020 ND2 Miata - Polymetal Grey, Red Nappa Leather
1993 Subaru WRX (2004 WRX engine, COBB access port)
2001 CBR600F4i

My Feedback (10-0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fei-Ji View Post
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Raid3n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 02:07 PM   #7
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,010
Thanked 1,174 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulutango View Post
Not exactly. IF the system you retrofitted....notice I said "System"..including the proper reflectors, lenses, washers, levelling system....are the same as offered by the car manufacturer....AND meet ALL federal standards....then yes, you will have nothing to worry about. If not then you are likely in trouble.

I used to issue #1 notice and order at roadside and tow the vehicle. Just because you might have some approved parts of a complete system, that doesn't make your modded setup safe or legal. You can strap a federally approved motorcycle engine onto a skaterboard...but you don't end up with a legal vehicle. Slapping some aftermarket HID bulbs into a halogen designed reflectror and lens setup ends up with uncontrolled light output that blinds other drivers and you don't have proper light output so you can see properly. I'm sure almost everybody here has been blinded by aftermarket HIDs in some oncoming vehicle at one time or another?
Would you also give a ticket to a properly retrofitted system with a good cutoff?

How strict have you found other LEOs with regards to properly done lighting upgrades?
AstulzerRZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 05:03 PM   #8
Throw yo paws in da air!
 
XplicitLuder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: State of Trance
Posts: 5,125
Thanked 2,778 Times in 956 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raid3n View Post
i believe technically if it wasn't an option offered for your car, any modification to the lighting is illegal.
this is what i was told and always heard. if the HID's didnt come straight from factory and mounted on the car, it was considered illegal. Whether an office wants to pull you over for it, well i guess that's another story
__________________

Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts


2008 Infiniti M45X - Y50 (Current)
2000 Honda Prelude SH (Sold)
1995 Dodge Spirit (Sold)
1998 Nissan Maxima SE (Sold)
1996 Honda Prelude SR-V (Sold)
XplicitLuder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 05:10 PM   #9
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,255
Thanked 8,904 Times in 3,867 Posts
^ I believe they don't technically have to have been factory installed on your car, but they have to have been optional for that chassis and you have to install all of the OEM components. So if you have a base model and get everything associated with the HID system and install it you're legal, otherwise technically you're not.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 06:24 AM   #10
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
Would you also give a ticket to a properly retrofitted system with a good cutoff?

How strict have you found other LEOs with regards to properly done lighting upgrades?


This is the standard that must be met..

General lighting requirements
4.02 (1) A vehicle on a highway must only be equipped with and use lamps, reflectors or other illuminating devices authorized by this Division or authorized in writing by the director.

(2) A vehicle on a highway must be equipped with lamps equivalent to those provided by the original manufacturer in accordance with the requirements that applied under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada), or a predecessor to that Act, at the time of vehicle manufacture.
(3) All lamps, lamp bulbs and reflectors required or permitted by this Division must comply with
(a) the approved standards established by the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada) and the applicable SAE standards,
(b) the conditions of use described in this Division, and
(c) the requirements of Table 1 of the Schedule to this Division.



The problem is not just the cutoff, it is the way the entire light output is directed and controlled and focused. Halogen reflectors and lenses are designed to control halogen output...HID's are a completely different type of light output and the halogen setup can not control it....that's why it blinds other drivers. IF the car had a complete factory retrofit then it would not be noticable and you would likely not be stopped in the first place.

As far as how you might be treated roadside goes? It depends on the knowledge the officer has on the subject. I did lots of reserarch as I was a full time Traffic Member. Others may also do that. A General Duties Member going from call to call, with no knowledge or background or time, may not stop you. IF the Member knows how dangerous it is then you could expect to be treated accordingly.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-19-2015, 06:29 AM   #11
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore View Post
^ I believe they don't technically have to have been factory installed on your car, but they have to have been optional for that chassis and you have to install all of the OEM components. So if you have a base model and get everything associated with the HID system and install it you're legal, otherwise technically you're not.

I used to own a Mini Cooper S with factory HIDs as standard equipment. A Mini Cooper non-S did not have HID's IF you had gone to Mini and requested the HIDs be installed in your Cooper and they installed a full HID setup from an S, then you would be OK, as the HIDs were an optional extra for the standard Cooper. BTW, the complete system with washers and levelling system, reflectors and lenses...costs thousands installed by the dealers.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-19-2015, 07:37 AM   #12
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Soundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulutango View Post
I used to own a Mini Cooper S with factory HIDs as standard equipment. A Mini Cooper non-S did not have HID's IF you had gone to Mini and requested the HIDs be installed in your Cooper and they installed a full HID setup from an S, then you would be OK, as the HIDs were an optional extra for the standard Cooper. BTW, the complete system with washers and levelling system, reflectors and lenses...costs thousands installed by the dealers.
Gee, so you're saying a $40 HID kit from Alibaba isn't the same?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-19-2015, 07:46 AM   #13
Pull Out Towing. Women rescued for free.
 
SumAznGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hongcouver
Posts: 8,449
Thanked 2,414 Times in 1,283 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy View Post
Gee, so you're saying a $40 HID kit from Alibaba isn't the same?
$40 HID kit from Alibaba means you over paid for it.
And if you did buy one for $40 from Alibaba, I have a bridge to sell you. It's a good deal.
__________________
Originally posted by Iceman_19 you should have tried to touch his penis. that really throws them off.
Originally posted by The7even SumAznGuy > Billboa
Originally posted by 1990TSI SumAznGuy> Internet > tinytrix
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 View Post
and icing on the cake, lady driving a newer chrysler 200 infront of me... jumped out of her car, dropped her pants, did an immediate squat and did probably the longest public relief ever...... steam and all.

(11-0-0) Buy/Sell rating
Christine
Shitvic
Pull Out Towing
SumAznGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 08:04 AM   #14
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,255
Thanked 8,904 Times in 3,867 Posts
Last night was the second time I had a vehicle coming at me (with nobody behind them) with illegally retrofitted headlights and foglights that were so blinding I flipped on my highbeams. Both times they "highbeamed" me back but their highbeams were these pathetic little things about as bright as a tea candle compared to their other lights. Anyone who can't figure out that your highbeams should be the brightest probably shouldn't have a license.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 08:11 AM   #15
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
BoostedBB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,799
Thanked 1,831 Times in 587 Posts
"(2) A vehicle on a highway must be equipped with lamps equivalent to those provided by the original manufacturer in accordance with the requirements that applied under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada), or a predecessor to that Act, at the time of vehicle manufacture."

Really does not leave much room for interpenetration. Unless the were installed on a factory vehicle as a factory option they are not legal. Does not matter if you use DOT/SAE approved lenses, projectors or anything else. Unless it came on the car from factory or as a factory installed option there not legal.

As for real world, if there not blinding people and aimed you should not see any issues unless you get a VI or something.
__________________
15' Lexus RC-F

07-17 G37 RWD Coupe Coilovers FOR SALE BRAND NEW
BoostedBB6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 12:47 PM   #16
I STILL don't get it
 
entrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 460
Thanked 694 Times in 157 Posts
Has no one read the thread title?

This is about Retrofit HIDs. As in actually putting in a projector for HIDs.

Quote:
Anyone here get pulled over for having retrofit headlights in their cars?
Not just slapping on HID bulbs into your halogen housing.

I've had retrofits with fx-r projectors and minid2s since 2011 and have never had an issue with it. I go through road checks during weekends lots and no one has ever mentioned anything about it.

Illegal? Technically yes. You can be cited for a VI for it as mentioned above:

Quote:
"(2) A vehicle on a highway must be equipped with lamps equivalent to those provided by the original manufacturer in accordance with the requirements that applied under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada), or a predecessor to that Act, at the time of vehicle manufacture."

Really does not leave much room for interpenetration. Unless the were installed on a factory vehicle as a factory option they are not legal. Does not matter if you use DOT/SAE approved lenses, projectors or anything else. Unless it came on the car from factory or as a factory installed option there not legal.
As for getting blinded "because it's not stock"
A lot of cars with projectors and HIDs do not have a leveling system, so the only thing that contributes to the lighting is the projector itself. So by installing projectors, then your cutoff, spread, width, throw, etc should all be correct according to OEM spec.
entrax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 02:09 PM   #17
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy View Post
Gee, so you're saying a $40 HID kit from Alibaba isn't the same?

I have this friend of my girlfriends....she looks just like Jennifer Lawrence...kinds....has hair, 2 legs, 2 arms,..other "approved parts"..wanna date her?

http://rightturnforever.com/wp-conte...Ugly-Women.jpg
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 02:17 PM   #18
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by entrax View Post
Has no one read the thread title?

This is about Retrofit HIDs. As in actually putting in a projector for HIDs.



Not just slapping on HID bulbs into your halogen housing.

I've had retrofits with fx-r projectors and minid2s since 2011 and have never had an issue with it. I go through road checks during weekends lots and no one has ever mentioned anything about it.

Illegal? Technically yes. You can be cited for a VI for it as mentioned above:



As for getting blinded "because it's not stock"
A lot of cars with projectors and HIDs do not have a leveling system, so the only thing that contributes to the lighting is the projector itself. So by installing projectors, then your cutoff, spread, width, throw, etc should all be correct according to OEM spec.

Daniel Stern Lighting Consultancy and Supply


In particular talking about retrofitting HIDs in projectors never designed for them. " be aware that even if the transplanted optics come from a legal headlamp, the end result—the modified headlamp—is no longer compliant with the applicable regulations."

Look at this guy's qualifications...he is an authority and he knows his stuff.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 02:52 PM   #19
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
BoostedBB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,799
Thanked 1,831 Times in 587 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by entrax View Post
Has no one read the thread title?

This is about Retrofit HIDs. As in actually putting in a projector for HIDs.



Not just slapping on HID bulbs into your halogen housing.

I've had retrofits with fx-r projectors and minid2s since 2011 and have never had an issue with it. I go through road checks during weekends lots and no one has ever mentioned anything about it.

Illegal? Technically yes. You can be cited for a VI for it as mentioned above:



As for getting blinded "because it's not stock"
A lot of cars with projectors and HIDs do not have a leveling system, so the only thing that contributes to the lighting is the projector itself. So by installing projectors, then your cutoff, spread, width, throw, etc should all be correct according to OEM spec.
OEM = Original Equipment Manufacturer, if its not Original Equipment it does not meet specification, nor is it "equivalent to those provided by the original manufacturer in accordance with the requirements that applied under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada)"

Blinding people is a side effect of a poor setup and common with cheap HID kids thrown into standard housings. Regardless, the law is the law, and the legality of it is, unless it came with HID from the manufacturer or they offered a kit at the dealer level that was certified by the DOT to be used, its illegal to do so yourself.
__________________
15' Lexus RC-F

07-17 G37 RWD Coupe Coilovers FOR SALE BRAND NEW
BoostedBB6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 08:59 PM   #20
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
ancient_510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: YVR
Posts: 352
Thanked 208 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulutango View Post
even if the transplanted optics come from a legal headlamp, the end result—the modified headlamp—is no longer compliant with the applicable regulations.
Without going too far off topic, would a complete replacement of a complete OE headlamp assembly from one vehicle to another of a different make & model be legal?

Specifically that I've got OE BMW E32/E34 Ellipsoids in my Datsun 510. I've always assumed that I was running around with the most modern yet most legal setup but never cared to ask.
ancient_510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2015, 12:02 AM   #21
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,025
Thanked 9,800 Times in 3,897 Posts
i have properly aimed and retrofitted hid for over 6 months now. Never hassled.

i really needed the improved visibility while not blinding others...pricey mod but well worth it in vancouver...on the stock halogens I had trouble seeing the lines when it's raining.

My car is stock looking though...no real heat score. My guess is if you have the retrofit aimed down and not some flashy colour temp over 6000k...you should be just fine.

Last edited by twitchyzero; 12-20-2015 at 12:13 AM.
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2015, 04:25 AM   #22
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient_510 View Post
Without going too far off topic, would a complete replacement of a complete OE headlamp assembly from one vehicle to another of a different make & model be legal?

Specifically that I've got OE BMW E32/E34 Ellipsoids in my Datsun 510. I've always assumed that I was running around with the most modern yet most legal setup but never cared to ask.

Having driven Datsun 510's back when they were brand new, I'm pretty sure they did not come with HIDs.... BTW, couple of my buddies used to race 510's and they were THEEE hot race ride in their class. In answer to your question....no. Not OE for your car. There may be height differences, distance between the headlights lights different....things that would affect the light output and direction. Will you get stopped??? I'd probably have stopped you just to look at the car I believe Paul Newman used to race 510's at one point in SCCA races and was close to national champion. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/220113500511313991/
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-21-2015, 10:25 PM   #23
I subscribe to Revscene
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Personally I'd prefer the regulators ban HIDs altogether.
Properly aimed or not, they're a nuisance.
Roads aren't flat, and this exposes oncoming drivers to the full wrath of the light output below the cut-off shield. When it rains, you get terrible reflection off the road surface.

Nobody needs two collapsing stars on the front of their car.
__________________
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement: http://thenewspaper.com/

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2015, 11:09 AM   #24
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Love your geek reference to death stars.......may The Force be with you.....!!!!!
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2015, 12:06 PM   #25
I subscribe to Revscene
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
This Tesla was behind me yesterday. I had to dim the mirror.

So it's not just ricers sticking HIDs in reflectors that are the problem.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tesla.JPG (34.0 KB, 0 views)
__________________
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement: http://thenewspaper.com/

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net