You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Entertainment ForumTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE! Entertainment District
Members' movie reviews, Trailers, TV show post-discussions. Warning: Absolutely, do not post links to pirated or illegal download sites!
HorrorHeadlinesVideos
Welcome To A New World Of Gods & Monsters With A Thrilling Trailer Sneak Peek & Poster For THE MUMMY
"I saw her... she is real." The first fifteen seconds of terrifying footage from Tom Cruise's next movie, The Mummy, has landed and it's even more awesome than you could've imagined. Come check it out!
Universal Pictures has officially announced that the long-awaited trailer for Tom Cruise's next major blockbuster, The Mummy, will finally arrive this Sunday.
As part of their announcement, they've debuted an awesome fifteen-second sneak peek, which provides us with our first real look at actual footage from the upcoming Alex Kurtzman-directed monster movie. Cruise provides the only dialogue, but we also get to see his co-stars in action, including Annabelle Wallis, Russell Crowe as Dr. Jekyll, and Sofia Boutella as the titular villainess. We also have a very welcoming poster for you to enjoy.
__________________ "The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds
just the first movie. maybe the second (cgi was terrible).
after that... all crap.
i'm in just for Sofia Boutella
__________________ "The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds
Originals were among the worst movies I can recall from the era. I remember these starting my hatred for shitty CG in movies. The reboot will be even worse, I'm sure
Originals were among the worst movies I can recall from the era. I remember these starting my hatred for shitty CG in movies. The reboot will be even worse, I'm sure
Can you list some movies where you think the CG is good, I can only remember you dumping on movies for shitty CG lol
Can you list some movies where you think the CG is good, I can only remember you dumping on movies for shitty CG lol
Any movie with CG that wasn't noticeable is good in my books. Movies like Edge of Tomorrow have lots of CG, but it's not the whole point of the movie. It doesn't take over to the point where it's distracting. They just use it to create characters and scenery that wouldn't fit in if done with practical effects.
The main issue is when practical effects, scenery, and actors are replaced by shitty CG. Most Marvel movies fall into this category easily, some more than others. Some are really bad, like Avengers, where they constantly replaces humans with poorly animated models. Some are fine, like Deadpool. Some work well, like Guardians of the Galaxy. Some are in between, with bad parts and really good ones, like Dr Strange. Not picking on Marvel, just coming up with some examples, and it's easy to stay within one producer.
Can they really not come up with better ideas than remaking 15 year old movies? I can see the aspect of remaking some really old school stuff that's like 30+ years old to reintroduce it to a new generation, but a 15 year old movie? Come on!
__________________
2000 Honda Civic
2002 Honda Accord Coupe
2005 Ford F-150 XLT
2008 Mercedes C300
2012 Ford F-150 XLT
2014 Ford F-150 FX4 - Current
1999 Chevy Trailblazer
2008 Range Rover Sport Supercharged
2015 Honda Civic Coupe EX-L
2018 Honda HR-V Touring
2019 Audi A4 Technik - Current
2012 Porsche 911 Targa 4 - Current
Can they really not come up with better ideas than remaking 15 year old movies? I can see the aspect of remaking some really old school stuff that's like 30+ years old to reintroduce it to a new generation, but a 15 year old movie? Come on!
Surely, you didn't expect Disney to buy Marvel and Lucasfilm for billions and do nothing with them.
Any movie with CG that wasn't noticeable is good in my books. Movies like Edge of Tomorrow have lots of CG, but it's not the whole point of the movie. It doesn't take over to the point where it's distracting. They just use it to create characters and scenery that wouldn't fit in if done with practical effects.
The main issue is when practical effects, scenery, and actors are replaced by shitty CG. Most Marvel movies fall into this category easily, some more than others. Some are really bad, like Avengers, where they constantly replaces humans with poorly animated models. Some are fine, like Deadpool. Some work well, like Guardians of the Galaxy. Some are in between, with bad parts and really good ones, like Dr Strange. Not picking on Marvel, just coming up with some examples, and it's easy to stay within one producer.
Avatar must be a top cgi based movie
__________________
2013 Toyota Tundra CrewMax TRD Offroad *CURRENT*
2005 Nissan Xterra SE *SOLD*
1991 Toyota Hilux Surf SSR-X Widebody *SOLD*
2001 Acura Integra Type-R *SOLD* Club-Integra.net OG
Your Friendly Neighborhood Firefighter
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,650
Thanked 10,381 Times in 3,907 Posts
uhm the ones with brendan fraser werent the originals... rofl those were a remake too of the 1932 classic starring Boris Karloff
Tom Cruise is also doing a Van Helsing movie, he was originally going to be in the one that Hugh Jackman was in but scheduling or something forced Tom to pass on it
__________________ "The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds
uhm the ones with brendan fraser werent the originals... rofl those were a remake too of the 1932 classic starring Boris Karloff
That's the difference though, the original was made in 1932, then the Brendan Fraser remake can so many years later. Just saying, in my opinion, that they shouldn't be remade so few years apart.
Now after seeing the trailer for this new movie, seems like it's nothing like the Brendan Fraser movie. Perhaps they should have given it a different name? Looks decent.
__________________
2000 Honda Civic
2002 Honda Accord Coupe
2005 Ford F-150 XLT
2008 Mercedes C300
2012 Ford F-150 XLT
2014 Ford F-150 FX4 - Current
1999 Chevy Trailblazer
2008 Range Rover Sport Supercharged
2015 Honda Civic Coupe EX-L
2018 Honda HR-V Touring
2019 Audi A4 Technik - Current
2012 Porsche 911 Targa 4 - Current
this is a much more modernized reboot. Totally different. I don't know what the typical reboot gap is; but from my memory, Batman and The hulk were one that were rebooted within the shortest amount of gaps
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
