didnt say she wasnt guilty and couldnt be convicted
but she clearly stated she wanted to burn his penis, not all of him, she wasnt in a clear state of mind and one can argue it wasnt foreseeable that he would die from her attempting to burn his penis

the intent is questionable... i think she could have gotten off on manslaughter

^ lol...must be something wrong in her statement. It would be interesting if we can read the full judgement.

if I were her lawyer, I really don't know how to convince the jury that burning his penis is NOT grevious bodily harm :lol

that chick is FUCKEEEEEEEEEED

crazy people need to burn, and yeah.... bew to scary clingy women