![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When people think Mustang they think V8 Muscle. Period. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A lot of manufacturers are starting to match 6 cylinder engines with turbos. I think the turbo lag we used to associate with 90's turbo four cylinders will be a thing of the past. ...and RE, 4cyl muscle car, the V6 mustang outsells the V8 mustang by a big margin if I recall correctly. A lot of people just want the image. |
Quote:
Times are different now... Back then, you didn't have a lot of women buying the Mustang either. |
Quote:
wasn't at one point in history the dodge challenger became a little mitsubishi-based car? |
^^we are talking about 20 years difference in time frame |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think times are changing. BMW stopped turbocharging it's engines for a long period and now all of their top non-M models are turbo'd. I think a Turbo M car is just a matter of time. |
The Mustang isn't a sports car, it never was. I had a '91 LX 5.0 as my first car but I'll let the other resident Mustang experts explain... But back to the issue at hand... the turbo mustang didn't sell well and failed BECAUSE it was a 4banger. A simple show of hands will show you that. Everyone who thinks of a turbo4 when they hear Ford Mustang raise your hands. Everyone who thinks of a turbo4 when they hear American muscle, please raise your hands... Chances are, they never even knew they existed. Sales of the Mustang other than the V8's didn't really pick up until the 4th gen, prior to that, the LX5.0 outsold all other Ford cars. What was different with the 4th gen was women started to find it appealing for them to drive but many of them opted for the V6 rather than the 8. Today, sales of the 6 may or may not be higher (I can't confirm this) than the 8 but it's still the 8 that people think associate with Mustang |
Quote:
But well, the sales numbers spoke for themselves. |
The mustang WAS originally meant to be a sports car, like the corvette, but it quickly became far too heavy, with no real engineering R&D put into handling. Emphasis was always on aggressive looks and massive power - and thus the MUSCLE CAR was born. I sell Mustangs, but I would never call them a sports car. They are Muscle cars, pure and simple, and that's nothing to be ashamed of. Hell, if I had the extra income, I'd rock one. The new 2005+ frame are awesome, and can be made to handle extremely well. (as per the Shelby KR's) I'd actually even prefer an FR500C to the Porsche race car that I'm currently building. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Muscle cars in the 50's were colloquially called "Hot Rods", and in the 60's and 70's they were called "Supercars" The term "Muscle Car" didn't really enter mainstraim media until the mid to late 70's, when the classic muscle car production had already died off. You're right the Mustang spawned the Pony car era, but when average Joe thinks of a "Muscle Car" it's a car based on the Pony appearance (Long hood, short trunk) but with way more horsepower than the original Ponies. |
I almost bought an SVO when they came out. Ford crammed a lot of technology into the car and all the magazines raved about how great it drove. The V8 Mustang was quicker than the SVO in a straight line, and sold for several thousand less. That's what killed the SVO - that it was more expensive and slower. Nobody really cared that it handled and braked extremely well and would hand the GT its ass on a track. The only thing people wanted was to have a fast car for those stop-light to stop-light races. People call it a failure because of poor sales numbers, but that doesn't mean it was a lousy car. The SVO was a fantastic car that was basically too sophisticated for the general buying public. That said, I think Ford is stupid if they don't use this engine in the Mustang. It's pretty sad when your competitors V6 (Camaro) outclasses your V8. Especially when you have a turbo V6 in your corner that trumps the Camaros. People will be wondering why they let such a great engine sit on the shelf. |
I don't think the engine will be sitting on the shelf. If anything, I don't think they will be able to produce enough of them to meet the demand for the models that they are currently slated for. Usually this is a problem of the supplier. I can already foresee a shortage or turbos or other subcomponents from suppliers. By contrast, there are plenty of the current 4+Litre V6 and V8 engines sitting on shelves. As a Ford dealer, we have NOTHING on the engine other than what we read on autoblog. The biggest problem about it is customers expecting to be able to get a powerplant in any model car which may never happen. As far as I'm concerned, until it's in our system as an order, it's not available. |
good for ford. but nothing TOOOO exciting. |
Hey Kumbo1, I am trying to message you but I am unable to, because your mailbox is full. btw, thats looks like a powerful engine. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net