![]() |
AMG Boss: "The horsepower wars are over." http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog....es31_580op.jpg Quote:
Interesting |
yea, Mercedes is Germany's muscle car. It'd be great if they can make their cars handle that power. It'll give BMW a run for it's money |
It's all about the corners now, people don't care about the straight line performance as much. The ring is used as a benchmark. |
I think that's just talk for now. There will always be the market for hyperpowerful sedans. They don't build too many S65 AMG, but they lift the image and give bragging rights to the entire MB range. |
Quote:
but i would settle for s63 with 100hp less and $100K cheaper, could buy another c63. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Finally, someone that realizes sporty cars shouldn't weigh as much as pigs. |
Unfortunately, MB, BMW, and Audi are all going to kill their specific performance cars....from my understanding, the new M cars are going to be only warmed over regular models....no more M specific high revving motors. They will be using the TT 3L in the new M3 and the TT 4.8L in the new M5. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thank god. There is no point of producing 500+ HP with just RWD. That is just plain stupid. I can go fast straight... but I just can't corner. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
thats what separates a good driver from a bad driver, throttle control |
i doubt the people who actually buy these cars still have the agility/dexterity to drive them. did i just read "A-Class AMG"?! |
Quote:
That's why you see so many middle aged chinese women in Richmond driving E63 AMGs... :D Even the black series....is an automatic. |
AMG should slot some 6spd into their cars, but that would kill their market share by like 80% because all the mercedes i've seen are automatics. Finding a manual one is like a virgin in a whorehouse. |
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaZExdTHHjY |
the GT-R Spec-V does the same thing. without increasing the power, they made everything else better. but i still think it would've been better if they could add more power. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obviously on different tracks the m3 will outpace the c63, but its hardly a huge margin between the overall turning abilities of both cars. [youtube]TdCpxC5Wn2w[/youtube] To reference other sources, such as the car and driver lightning lap, yeah the m3 outpaces the c63, but usualy by a fraction of a second, which in most cases depends on the driver's preferences and capabilities. Of course the older AMG cars weren't exactly handling machines, but mercedes has started to shift philosophies, starting with the clk black and the c63. The c63 unlike the previous c-class amg's was designed from the ground up to accomodate the amg treatment, whereas in the past, the c-classes just recieved a huge engine and a chassis that couldn't appropriately handle the power. Of course, take my words with a grain of salt, as I'm biased :p. |
man that's a beautiful shot...and I'm all for more innovative design/other ways to improve performance than just throwing more hp at a car! props to AMG |
As a daily driver, I would rather have the c63 vs m3...big torque and auto..hard to beat combo....I hope they adopt the SL63 wet clutch 7sp on the c63...that would awesome! However, I would rather have a e92 M3 than a c63 for a second fun car though |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net