:rolleyes:

A cookie if you can find ANY reference to ICBC in the referenced article.

The cop, technically, did not win the case. It was settled out of court.

When the cop sues the estate, does ICBC pick that up, or some other insurance company?

Perhaps a deal was struck... Since the cop can't sue his partner, him and the estate came up with a plan where the estate sued the driver and the injured cop would get a cut? That's a lot of red tape but I think everyone's happy...

^ Ditto.

I don't understand what everyone is bitching about... But I am not that familiar with the story. As far as I can tell, he was the passenger in an accident, received injuries due to a negligent driver, and was compensated for those injuries. Does being a cop make it any different?

I think the problem everybody is having with this situation is that the idiot cop who caused the accident could not be held responsible for the other cop's injuries, so the injured cop sued the estate of the DEAD VICTIMS from the crash. How is it that he's able to sue those who were obviously not all fault for his injuries?

+ 1


if a cop commits a major crime - he'll get suspension . . . . with pay.

like a few others on here who arent on the "i hate the police, so lets bash them" band wagon, i feel that what he did wasnt that bad. He was injured and was not able to be compensated for his injuries, so he sued the only people he could. The undisclosed amount is probably in the millions. It isnt like the money being awarded to the police officer is coming from the peoples actual estate.

This sounds like something that would happen in the US lol, but then he would have gotten like 2 million.

On another note, how does a cop admit to driving recklessly, and then the parties that they killed end up having to pay? Either they were somehow at fault as well or some shit ain't right

He is the douche bag of the day for me.

I think this article is leaving out some important details on what exactly happened. First off, it says WCB legislation prevented him from suing the driver or the police force. Problem with that is the police aren't even covered under WCB as one of the main rules of WCB is all employees have the right to refuse unsafe work. As police work is inherently unsafe, we are not allowed to refuse unsafe work, so WCB will not cover us. That mistake in the article leads me to believe there is far more to this story than what the article says.

I can't even begin to comprehend how you could sue an innocent victim and be successful. There is definitely more to this story.

the compensation is reasonable or even bit less for this kinda claim. 1.5 years of his
salary is considered nothing to ICBC, to be honest.

My buddy's gf was hit by a car on kingsway when crossing the road...she suffers bad
back pain, headache and weak knee over the past 3 years. So far ICBC has paid her
around 75,000 (her previous salary was around $10/hr)

For those who think it's unreasonable, think about if this ever happens to you, you would
want the same amount or more.

The issue isn't the amount, the issue is that it came from the victim's family..

hold the province accountable for a poorly written article.

wow fuck this shit, we should all lower our insurance to $1 mill. cuz no motherfucker is getting $3 mill out of these scum bags from ICBC

technically nothing has come from the victim's family. the police officers chunk would come out before the estate is divided :)

and where does that estate go smarty pants... -_-

also lets not forgot its 100k + his legal fees

fuckin despicable police these days, murder, robbery, beatings... feels like im in a communist state

I can't believe the ignorance and idiocy in this thread.

Reading comprehension?

The officer wasn't allowed to sue the other driver or the police force because he was an employee performing his job.

This doesn't mean that victims can't sue the police if something goes wrong. In fact, lawsuits against police agencies do occur and people get awarded large amounts of money.

In this case, there was a settlement between the police and the family, which shows that they did file lawsuit and it was settled out of court. The settlement was likely pretty hefty, since they dropped the case.



It does seem strange that the officer sued the victims family, but what can you do when you're not covered? He's also a victim, not only of the accident in which he was a passenger, but also because of stupid rules that prevent him from getting any sort of compensation for his injuries.

I say good on him for bringing this to light (the WCB rules that officers are forced to work under).



BTW, who does the Vancouver Police use for insurance? I thought it was their own system or something, and that they didn't use ICBC. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this would mean you couldn't sue ICBC since they aren't the insurance provider.

I think this is what happened: technically, the police officer was not allowed by law to sue the police, however the police want to help him out with hospital costs etc. from the injury. So the police work out a deal with the victim's family where they can settle out of court for an amount greater than $100,000. Basically the police dont' have a legal way to give the officer money directly, so they give it to him by have him sue the family, while settling an undisclosed amount out of court with them.

my thoughts anyway

WCB is a fucking scam.

This isn't a case of 'the Canadian Legal System'. He was sueing, so it would have been a civil matter.