REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Obama Sides With RIAA, Supports $150,000 Fine per Music Track (https://www.revscene.net/forums/569698-obama-sides-riaa-supports-%24150-000-fine-per-music-track.html)

wahyinghung 03-26-2009 12:23 AM

Obama Sides With RIAA, Supports $150,000 Fine per Music Track
 
The Obama administration for the first time is weighing in on a Recording Industry Association of America file sharing lawsuit and is supporting hefty awards of as much as $150,000 per purloined music track.

The government said the damages range of $750 to $150,000 per violation of the Copyright Act was warranted.

"The remedy of statutory damages for copyright infringement has been the cornerstone of our federal copyright law since 1790, and Congress acted reasonably in crafting the current incarnation of the statutory damages provision," Michelle Bennett, a Department of Justice trial attorney wrote (.pdf) Sunday to a Massachusetts federal judge weighing challenge to the Copyright Act.

The position -- that the Copyright Act's monetary damages are not unconstitutionally excessive -- mirrors the one taken by the Bush administration and should come as no surprise.

Two top lawyers in President Barack Obama's Justice Department are former RIAA lawyers: Donald Verrilli Jr. is the associate deputy attorney general who brought down Grokster and fought to prevent a retrial in the Jammie Thomas case. Then there's the No. 2 in the DOJ, Tom Perrilli. As Verrilli's former boss, Perrilli argued in 2002 that internet service providers should release customer information to the RIAA even without a court subpoena.

Presidential administrations often intervene in lawsuits in which the constitutionality of a federal law is in question. This case concerns a former Boston University student challenging a peer-to-peer file sharing case.

Still, parts of the government's brief sounded as if it was taken from the RIAA's public relations playbook.

"Congress sought to account for both the difficulty of quantifying damages in the context of copyright infringement and the need to deter millions of users of new technology from infringing copyrighted work in an environment where many violators believe that their activities will go unnoticed," Bennett wrote.

The RIAA has sued more than 30,000 individuals for file sharing the last five years. It is winding down the campaign and is lobbying internet service providers to discontinue service to copyright scofflaws.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...sides-wit.html

m4k4v4li 03-26-2009 01:10 AM

....

asian_XL 03-26-2009 01:21 AM

it's okay, there's always some new ways to download songs
geeks and nerds can't live without illegal downloading

BoneThug 03-26-2009 01:52 AM

damn straight

Harvey Specter 03-26-2009 03:16 AM

Riiiight, like all the mp3's on Obama's ipod were LEGAL.

hotjoint 03-26-2009 07:22 AM

great

twitchyzero 03-26-2009 08:18 AM

..and
thats why we live in canada

wouwou 03-26-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jah Al Zawahiri (Post 6348831)
Riiiight, like all the mp3's on Obama's ipod were LEGAL.

probably, he was running for President/is the President and I highly doubt he will risk it by saving a few bucks and download illegally.

He can probably expense it anyways


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net