![]() |
WTB: Tamron 17-50 2.8 Canon Hello everyone, looking for this fast everyday lens. Shoot me a price. Thanks |
http://cgi.ebay.ca/NEW-TAMRON-AF-17-...1%7C240%3A1318 i just bought one from this seller, fast trackable shipping and it's within Canada. best price i could find so far (brand new). locally shops wanted 629.99+tax, and on craigslist i offered someone 400 and they told me to try better (for used) |
Woah thats a SUPER good price for a new lens. Yeah I offered some guys on CL 400 too and no bites. Thanks for the heads up, might go for it. |
The Tamron isn't a lens I would want to buy off the internet. There is some definite sample variation, I think I would rather be able to test a few out in the store to check sharpness first. |
How would one tell a sharp copy from a non sharp one? I don't think the guy at the store would admit to handing u a non-sharp copy. any other lens we should watch out for? |
Quote:
BTW: has anyone found a comparison between the Tamron AF 17-50mm XR F/2.8 Di II Lens and the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC SLD ELD Aspherical Macro Lens? I have heard the Sigma can sometimes suffer from front/back focusing, however it is much quieter than the Tamron which everyone complains has a loud focus motor. I'm currently using my kit lens with the Canon XS (18-55mm IS) and like the photos it takes, but would like more speed in low light and a more shallow depth of field. I also own a Canon 50mm f/1.8 and Canon 55-250mm IS. |
I just got my Tamron yesterday. From all the readups online, the Sigma 18-50 isn't as sharp, isn't as quick to focus, and just generally gets poorer reviews (even though it costs more). The difference between the kit lens (I have the XS too) and the Tamron 17-50... amazing. I snapped a couple of quick shots at work today, www.flickr.com/photos/alatar/ if you want to look. All the other pictures in my flickr were taken with the kit lens, and there's definitely a noticeable difference. I did all the shots at work free-hand too. |
There's no really great way of testing it in store, unless you bring a laptop to check full size files. I tried a couple of lenses in store, taking pics out the door, and of anything inside with writing on it. Text is a good way to tell sharpness, but I was still using the cameras lcd which isn't the best. Zoom in all the way, and you can still tell if its sharp or not. |
Wow, people are asking so much for a 17-50 nowadays? A few months ago, I sold my first 17-50 for $400 (including a Hoya UV filter). My second 17-50 the guy only gave me $375 towards a trade for his 17-55 2.8 (I had originally asked for $400)...seems the value has gone up a bit since then. |
I suggest you go to Photo Expert in Delta. Great people there and they usually keep this Tammy in stock. |
I am pretty sure my bill came out to almost exactly $600 after taxes with a decent UV filter. $450 seems to be the average asking price, seems fair to me considering the lens is fairly new to the market (2-3 years?) |
Tamron upped their MSRP/cost on the lens, so you won't really find it cheaper than $630ish + tax locally now. Used to be around the $500 + tax range locally. |
just got mine from the ebay seller and photog nerd friend says it's sharp copy, but i already got it so sharp or not watever lol HUGE difference from stock lens tho. that i must say. they gonna tell me which one is sharp and which one is not in Delta? lol |
^ Thanks for the heads up. Going to go to that shop in Delta to check it out. Thanks for all the insight guys. Seems like a great lens! |
Quote:
if the copy you receive isn't sharp, can you send it off to tamron for calibration? |
I offered him 20 less and he counter offered me 10 more than my offer |
^ I countered 325US from 375 and he counter offered with 360. I then counteroffered that with 350 and he accepted. I already got my filters for it and its expected to arrive this Friday. A little longer than what most people said about shipping. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net