REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   LR2 HSE (https://www.revscene.net/forums/575542-lr2-hse.html)

wasabisashimi 05-12-2009 07:33 PM

LR2 HSE
 
Anyone has one? Not a bad looking small SUV.

Land rover seems to have reliability issues before, but this one apparently is made by Ford ???, Could it be a good CUV/SUV purchse?

What would you pick out of X3, Q5, Tiguan, LR2, EX35, RDX, GLK?

maxx 05-12-2009 07:41 PM

LR2 or Q5 - everything else is crap.

I own a 01 disco and not a single major problem with it. In its life time, i had to replace one window motor and rear wiper motor - both below $200 each.

When you buy Land Rover - you buy the best SUV on the planet. Audi seems to be winning as well off road so the Q is a safe bet.

The acura is horrible - the worst SUV of all you listed.
Bmw is allright. not the greatest off roader and not the best interior quality for X3.
Tiguan=Q5.
Infiniti - wow i thought the datsun GTR was ugly...
GLK is pretty much a Chrysler collaboration, from before when chrysler existed.

Ford started making Land Rovers in 2002. Sold to India a few years ago.

wasabisashimi 05-12-2009 09:37 PM

from interior and technology bells and whistles, I thought Q5 > LR2. LR2 looks pretty plain and basic even with the Navigation.

Not much price different i guess.

The one other thing is from the listed cars. Which one will give more BOAT feel while driving, and which one will feel like a sports car?
I listed EX35 because its powerful VQ engine and interier design.

maxx 05-12-2009 10:03 PM

if you like fancy technology and whatever else, land rover isnt for you.

roastpuff 05-12-2009 10:15 PM

RDX feels pretty nice to drive. Not "boaty" at all... and that engine has some punch when the turbo spools up. :D

winnie_the_pooh 05-13-2009 05:55 AM

I have a Freelander 2(LR2) myself. Such a great car! Suspension setting is firm and comfortable and it handles rather well!

wasabisashimi 05-13-2009 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winnie_the_pooh (Post 6421597)
I have a Freelander 2(LR2) myself. Such a great car! Suspension setting is firm and comfortable and it handles rather well!

$929 tax included for the 60 months 0% financing. (Current pricing for 2009, with lights, navi, etc)

Is this a deal or should i negotiate more

I didn't check Q5, RDX and EX35, but somehow i think these will be much cheaper.

JDM_CTR 05-14-2009 11:11 AM

I believe dollar for dollar you are getting most bang out of the MERCEDES GLK350. If you equip either the Q5, X3 etc side by side, the GLK is approx $3000-$5000 less

maxx 05-14-2009 11:55 AM

that's because its american :P

wasabisashimi 05-14-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxx (Post 6423262)
that's because its american :P

which car is american? GLK?

maxx 05-14-2009 12:58 PM

yah built on a chrysler platform with chrysler interior

in case u havent noticed, the chyrsler 300 is the old e class mercedes with 1986 e class suspension

wasabisashimi 05-14-2009 01:52 PM

MB and chrysler are still partners?

maxx 05-14-2009 03:16 PM

the glk was designed before the split

sonick 05-14-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxx (Post 6423487)
the glk was designed before the split

It's a bastard.

maxx 05-14-2009 03:29 PM

haha nice

jigga250 05-14-2009 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxx (Post 6421102)

The acura is horrible - the worst SUV of all you listed.

Only as far as off road ability. Coincidentally, its also the fastest and best handling of those listed.

wasabisashimi 05-14-2009 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jigga250 (Post 6423897)
Only as far as off road ability. Coincidentally, its also the fastest and best handling of those listed.

faster than the VQ3.5L infiniti Ex35?

ilvtofu 05-15-2009 10:37 PM

I have an X3 si and its great to drive but it's getting old now, as far as off road ability, for what the lower mainland can throw at you a decent set of snow tires will get you through in any one of these SUV/CUVs, can't stand people who drive out there with all seasons thinking they are invincible cause their cars are high up...

And in response to jigga250s comment I believe my stock X3 can easily outhandle and outperform the RDX, I've driven the RDX and its nowhere near as sharp as the X3. X3 is overpriced however but if you lease it it's cheaper than everyone else.

The LR2 looks nice but i've heard it doesn't drive very well, but it does look different than most other CUVs out there. I would say either the Q5 or the LR2, Q5 is newer and audi probably has better build quality. and not to mention QUATTRO!!!

observer 05-16-2009 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDM_CTR (Post 6423205)
I believe dollar for dollar you are getting most bang out of the MERCEDES GLK350. If you equip either the Q5, X3 etc side by side, the GLK is approx $3000-$5000 less

The GLK350 works out to be less than $900 including taxes on a 3 year walk away lease.

It's based on a stretched C-class platform and unlike the GL and ML, it's made in Germany.

Haven't driven the LR2, what's the AWD system like, front wheel drive based? Q5 is not bad, but more expensive than the GLK with similar equipment.

kumbo1 05-17-2009 08:29 AM

How about a Jeep Grand Cherokee CDI?

zilla510 05-17-2009 08:49 AM

The LR2 is a good vehicle compared to the other Land Rover line up. Reliability is not an issue as it doesn't have a lot of problems. Power band is pretty good and driver usability is easy and straight forward. It has a very comfortable ride.

ilvtofu 05-17-2009 02:18 PM

I think fuel economy wise the LR2 would probably be the worst,

If i had to choose it would still be the LR2 or the Q5,

GLK looks poorly proportioned, although it is a good deal... but Mercedes quality shouldn't be trusted...

Used LR2s probably go for pretty cheap if its like any other Land Rover.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net