REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-15-2009, 07:27 PM   #51
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumAznGuy View Post
Video doesn't like, but it doesn't tell the absolute truth.

At no point in time is 5 officers charging at the guy and tacking him a good idea. What if in the struggle, one of the officer's gun's go off? What if the gun was snatched by the guy being tackled?

If you have taken any security type course, or police training, they will teach you that that is a bad idea.

Not to mention, the guy was upset before the police arrived. If they police tried to restrain him by attacking him, do you think the guy would curl up into a ball to be arrested or would he fight back? How do you know the guy was unarmed? What if he had a knife or a metal stapler?
Not to mention that when you get into a physical altercation, if someone falls awkwardly and breaks their neck, it is pretty much GG.

Would you want that to happen? How would the media and all you guys react then? "Why didn't they use non-lethal force like a tazer?" fucking hypocrites.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
They have these things you have to go through before you get on a plane, they're called security checks and they have these things called metal detectors...
Yeah, because no one makes mistakes. Because those guys at the security checks are so well trained and paid so much that they actually pay full attention to what they are doing on a daily basis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Vicious View Post
I dunno bout you but ive watched cops...and they always restrain a victim by tackling him.

Not to mention your other point is moot. The gun cannot go off because their is a safety, and when 5 officers are taking down 1 person, i don't think hed have a chance to unbutton the holster then pull the gun down.
Yeah, watching "cops" is really how to obtain an accurate and clear idea of what cops do. Because you know, that stuff isn't selected and edited at all. Not to mention the show is an american portrayal of police and not a canadian one.

Guns have gone off with the safety on before. Though the circumstances and situation for that to happen is rare, it is possible. Like a tazer killing someone something that can happen but isn't designed to. It is actually relatively easy to take a gun out of the holster when you have 5 targets to get it from.
Advertisement
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:03 PM   #52
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,746
Thanked 5,295 Times in 1,950 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS View Post
Yeah, because no one makes mistakes. Because those guys at the security checks are so well trained and paid so much that they actually pay full attention to what they are doing on a daily basis.
Yeah because someone who plans to smuggle a knife onboard a plane is planning to use it 12 hours AFTER they get off.

They'd probably have to be the world's worst terrorists.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:09 PM   #53
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
Yeah because someone who plans to smuggle a knife onboard a plane is planning to use it 12 hours AFTER they get off.

They'd probably have to be the world's worst terrorists.
Yeah, because you know, the cops really had ALL THE INFO RIGHT FUCKING THERE AT THAT MOMENT.

Do you have any intelligent statements to make or are you just posting for the sake of it?

And FFS, AT THE VERY LEAST have a rebuttal for your "I'd rather get shot" statement.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:22 PM   #54
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,746
Thanked 5,295 Times in 1,950 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Kiss my rebuttal.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:37 PM   #55
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
Kiss my rebuttal.
I accept your apology.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 10:58 PM   #56
Pull Out Towing. Women rescued for free.
 
SumAznGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hongcouver
Posts: 8,449
Thanked 2,414 Times in 1,283 Posts
Failed 128 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS View Post
Not to mention that when you get into a physical altercation, if someone falls awkwardly and breaks their neck, it is pretty much GG.

Would you want that to happen? How would the media and all you guys react then? "Why didn't they use non-lethal force like a tazer?" fucking hypocrites.
Quoted for truth.
__________________
Originally posted by Iceman_19 you should have tried to touch his penis. that really throws them off.
Originally posted by The7even SumAznGuy > Billboa
Originally posted by 1990TSI SumAznGuy> Internet > tinytrix
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 View Post
and icing on the cake, lady driving a newer chrysler 200 infront of me... jumped out of her car, dropped her pants, did an immediate squat and did probably the longest public relief ever...... steam and all.

(11-0-0) Buy/Sell rating
Christine
Shitvic
Pull Out Towing
SumAznGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 11:32 PM   #57
Hypa owned my ass at least once
 
Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 6,745
Thanked 1,314 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 124 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactX View Post
I went to Singapore 2 weeks ago, when I was waiting at the customs hall at the Singapore Airport, a customs officer fucked up and opened a lane when not supposed to. People (visitors) including me rushed to that lane just to have the officer closed that lane again. Was I pissed? Hell yea.

The people, including me, then pondered for a while and went back to their previous lanes because they were smart enough to not do anything stupid in an airport like acting uncooperative, throwing stuff (computers) around, wielding a stolen stapler and resisting arrest.

And I am pretty sure that all my loved ones are smart enough not to do anything stupid when confronted by authorities in airports regardless of location and language barrier.
Bingo
Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 12:47 AM   #58
reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
 
Mr.HappySilp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
Failed 929 Times in 340 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
How the hell can anyone come to THAT conclusion?

If MY family member was unjustly killed by the RCMPosse I'd sure as hell make sure they got any disciplinary action coming to them. No amount of money can replace a loved one.
Sure we all l want justice if our love ones are kill. However from looking at the whole story the mom mostly wanted money. Again no money should be awarded if she only wanted true justce to be serve. Like you said the RCMP fuck up so those cops should get what they deverse.
Mr.HappySilp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 03:40 AM   #59
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,739
Thanked 10,007 Times in 2,614 Posts
Failed 394 Times in 160 Posts
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090616/...r-49bfa63.html
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 04:07 AM   #60
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HappySilp View Post
Sure we all l want justice if our love ones are kill. However from looking at the whole story the mom mostly wanted money. Again no money should be awarded if she only wanted true justce to be serve. Like you said the RCMP fuck up so those cops should get what they deverse.
the mom only wanted money?! wtf are you talking about... were you watching the same series of events everyone elsee did? oO
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 04:15 AM   #61
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,432
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
so what happened to the cop that also killed another motorist
while he was drunk driving?

That should get some good attention as well since Jimmy Ng's death rattled the public.
Drift_Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:47 PM   #62
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Tee hee
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 11:06 PM   #63
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,746
Thanked 5,295 Times in 1,950 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS View Post
Tee hee
Tee Hee Indeed.

Ass raping email disclosure FTW.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 07:39 AM   #64
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
Tee Hee Indeed.

Ass raping email disclosure FTW.


I love how you revive this thread for that reason. Somehow, I knew you would. I am very glad you did though.

Please, tell me how ANY of my points are no longer valid still. It will give me the opportunity to do some "ass raping FTW" style arguments.

Even if they discussed the use of tazers prior to the incident, it STILL does not mean the cops meant to kill him. So, please, explain to me how being shot is a better alternative to being tazed? I'm still waiting.

And to quote directly from the article, "Finally spoke to Wayne and he indicated that the members did not articulate that they saw the symptoms of excited delirium, but instead had discussed the response en route and decided that he did not comply that they would go to CEW."

If you are fucking stupid enough to throw a hissy fit in an AIRPORT and don't fucking do what the cops tell you to, you're up for the darwin awards. Yes, there were no translators but if you see 4 police officers coming towards you, what do you do? Throw more hissy fits and struggle? Yeah, give them a reason.

So I bring up the point yet again, what would have been a better alternative? Physical force and possibly getting more people injured/killed or being shot?

Oh that's right. If I am Great68, I would rather be shot.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 07:57 AM   #65
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,098
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS View Post


I love how you revive this thread for that reason. Somehow, I knew you would. I am very glad you did though.

Please, tell me how ANY of my points are no longer valid still. It will give me the opportunity to do some "ass raping FTW" style arguments.

Even if they discussed the use of tazers prior to the incident, it STILL does not mean the cops meant to kill him. So, please, explain to me how being shot is a better alternative to being tazed? I'm still waiting.
IMO the issues is not so much that the person was tased. It's pretty obvious that people will prefer the use of non-lethal force.

The bigger issue is that they tased him 4 times. What's the RCMP's protocol for tasing? Keep shooting until you're satisfied?

And the fact that they planned it before hand means they did not want to assess the situation, rather, they just wanted to subdue the guy and GTFO.

Now is this how we want the law enforcement to treat everyone?

What if a person happened to be working on his yard (using a rake) and a pissy neighbour called that person in wrongfully. Is it justified that the police just come and start shooting tasers because they see the guy holding a rake ? (which could be used as a weapon) What are you guys gonna say? He shouldn't have been dumb enough to be holding a rake?

To the people arguing the use of tasers- you guys are being stupid. It is the better choice when trying to disarm someone. I'd rather be tased that be beaten by batons or shot. Being tased has a low chance of incurring injuries after the confrontation. However, the excessive use of taser is not acceptable. It's like beating someone, it's not lethal if it's a punch or two, but if you continuously beat on someone, they will eventually die. Just because a taser is considered as non-lethal doesn't mean they should abuse it. Doesn't matter if they meant to kill or not, point is they abused a power that they were entrusted with.
__________________
:o
ecchiecchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 08:09 AM   #66
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecchiecchi View Post
IMO the issues is not so much that the person was tased. It's pretty obvious that people will prefer the use of non-lethal force.

The bigger issue is that they tased him 4 times. What's the RCMP's protocol for tasing? Keep shooting until you're satisfied?

And the fact that they planned it before hand means they did not want to assess the situation, rather, they just wanted to subdue the guy and GTFO.

Now is this how we want the law enforcement to treat everyone?

What if a person happened to be working on his yard (using a rake) and a pissy neighbour called that person in wrongfully. Is it justified that the police just come and start shooting tasers because they see the guy holding a rake ? (which could be used as a weapon) What are you guys gonna say? He shouldn't have been dumb enough to be holding a rake?

To the people arguing the use of tasers- you guys are being stupid. It is the better choice when trying to disarm someone. I'd rather be tased that be beaten by batons or shot. Being tased has a low chance of incurring injuries after the confrontation. However, the excessive use of taser is not acceptable. It's like beating someone, it's not lethal if it's a punch or two, but if you continuously beat on someone, they will eventually die. Just because a taser is considered as non-lethal doesn't mean they should abuse it. Doesn't matter if they meant to kill or not, point is they abused a power that they were entrusted with.
1. Not if you're Grea68. He prefers to be shot.
2. Completely right. Cops fucked up right here and hugely too. But Dziekanski didn't make it any easier by continuing to struggle and by giving the cops a hard time.
3. No, they planned to use the tazer if the suspect did not comply. This is one of those situations that need to be handled ASAP. An airport is not a good place to incite panic. If you see someone going crazy and throwing a fit, you need to neutralize that immediately.
4. Terrible example. This situation is nothing like the one mentioned. The use of tazers or anything like that would not even be a possibility unless the person with the rake was waving and swingingly it at police.
5. Agreed. Well said.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 08:21 AM   #67
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,746
Thanked 5,295 Times in 1,950 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 11:04 AM   #68
Banned (ABWS)
 
azzurro32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: west vancouver
Posts: 878
Thanked 82 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 101 Times in 27 Posts
If cops tased him and he lived, they woulda got a nice pat on the back and this whole mess obviously wouldn't have happened. However since he died they are getting the blame.

But the blame should be on him for being an idiot in an airport of all places.
azzurro32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 12:22 PM   #69
I have named my kids VIC and VLS
 
Hondaracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,295
Thanked 15,995 Times in 6,514 Posts
Failed 2,158 Times in 740 Posts
^ if no one had videotaped it and he still died they probably would have got a pat on the back.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
Hondaracer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 02:35 PM   #70
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,620
Thanked 218 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 43 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer View Post
^ if no one had videotaped it and he still died they probably would have got a pat on the back.
+1

And this is what kinda of irks me about CRS posts. While I see your stance and your support for the police, its the fact that if their was no videotape ALL THESE inconsistency's with the case, all the lies, all the scandals would not have come to life if it weren't of the video. It irks me because we all know these situations are happening more often than we know, and they are not getting publicized. The cops have no right to be above the legal law, and yet this whole debacle has displayed the rcmp's stance on protecting its officers over owning up to its faults.
rslater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 02:51 PM   #71
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 805
Thanked 574 Times in 129 Posts
Failed 42 Times in 13 Posts
Hmm.. I understand the reasoning behind the initial tazing (what an idiot Dziekanski was being inside an airport where security is at its highest). But don't the RCMP have protocols in place for people who resist arrest even after the first, or maybe second tazing?

Do they not understand that continued tazing, as stated before, can turn lethal very quickly if used continuously. They have no medical history of the subject (at least i didn't think so?) so what if they have some sort of condition which makes them susceptible to certain events due to electrical currents? (which obviously happened in this case..)

I'm confused as to why they couldn't come up with a alternative to arrest Dziekanski. After one or two tazings they must be affected somehow and weakened to a point where physical harm can arrest the person, am I wrong? And I guess that may be the whole point behind the controversy?
chouchou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 03:49 PM   #72
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
I accept your apology.

Again.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 05:41 PM   #73
Hypa owned my ass at least once
 
Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 6,745
Thanked 1,314 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 124 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chouchou View Post
Do they not understand that continued tazing, as stated before, can turn lethal very quickly if used continuously. They have no medical history of the subject (at least i didn't think so?) so what if they have some sort of condition which makes them susceptible to certain events due to electrical currents? (which obviously happened in this case..)
Restoring order ASAP in an airport is for the benefit of the masses, not the individual (Dziekanski). The police opted for the tazer as they are less lethal than other law enforcing equipment, but by less actually means, there is that small margin of error and Dziekanski fell in that.

There will always be margins of error but that doesn't mean you keep handicapping your law enforcers to eliminate the margins of error. Despite popular belief, not all police officers are corrupt, power hungry, authoritarians that is usually depicted on the media.

Dziekanski was just a bad accident. An accident he brought to himself. An accident that will never occur again as most people aren't that dumb.

Last edited by Noir; 06-20-2009 at 09:00 PM.
Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:13 PM   #74
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,746
Thanked 5,295 Times in 1,950 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS View Post
I accept your apology.

Again.
Awe aren't you a sweetie pie.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:21 PM   #75
Pull Out Towing. Women rescued for free.
 
SumAznGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hongcouver
Posts: 8,449
Thanked 2,414 Times in 1,283 Posts
Failed 128 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir View Post
Dziekanski was just a bad accident. An accident he brought to himself. An accident that will never occur again as most people aren't that dumb.
We can only hope.

But based on what I read here, I think great68 might be one of the exceptions since he wants to get shot in the leg.

If anyone has any doubts to what CRS said about getting shot.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/1998/...pbc981128.html
__________________
Originally posted by Iceman_19 you should have tried to touch his penis. that really throws them off.
Originally posted by The7even SumAznGuy > Billboa
Originally posted by 1990TSI SumAznGuy> Internet > tinytrix
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 View Post
and icing on the cake, lady driving a newer chrysler 200 infront of me... jumped out of her car, dropped her pants, did an immediate squat and did probably the longest public relief ever...... steam and all.

(11-0-0) Buy/Sell rating
Christine
Shitvic
Pull Out Towing
SumAznGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net