![]() |
Quote:
|
Most probably, that and the C-class is pretty good looking compared to... yeah |
tahoe? |
looking at an used S4 AVANT... hows the trunk space, and fuel economy, should be better than Jeep SRT8? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
... but if you bought one i wouldn't disagree with your choice :thumbsup: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's Denali, not Denial. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
or if you want to get serious.... i would suggest this http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/bn...369326125.html V10 Twin Turbo Diesel... you can haul anything you want with that thing. chip it and you got 800 ft/lb of torque |
Quote:
|
INFINITI QX56! |
I can't believe no one suggested Mazda CX-9 yet. It doesn't have the luxury brand cachet, but it drives as well, if not better than them. It's also not common like Rav4, RDX, GLK etc. Great crossover. Lots of room, seats 7, handles like a car, reliable. Car magazines have also gave it stellar reviews. http://www.consumersearch.com/files/...X-9_1_LEAD.jpg |
Quote:
|
It is a Haldex system similar to Quattro of A3/TT, but not the same as A4/Q5 etc. Mostly front biased to save fuel, but it automatically transfers power to the wheels that need it more before it loses grip. So it is considered a full time AWD. Actually the Rav4 system is similar. So is FX35, which is rear biased, but power is transfered to the front wheels during acceleration and cornering. etc. CRV on the otherhand does NOT transfer power until wheelspin occurs. |
how come these systems sounded like a traction control system as oppose to full time symetrical system |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldex_Traction Just realised LR2 is actually a Haldex based 4wd system as well!!!! Cause a full time awd system with 50/50 torque split wastes gas, and is not generally needed for normal commuter vehicles. |
get a fucking new 4 runner and be done with it. |
Ford Flex - 340hp twin-turbo v6. Oh, and it has all the other stuff that you were looking for ;) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
ya, I want some car with luxury and brand image. 4 runner wont cut it, CX-9 wont do ( I dont need a 7 seater), Ford Flex isnt up there although twin turbo sounded cool. Update, Cars still in the list: Q5, jeep SRT8 ( wife doesn't like the look), Maybe MDX, volvo XC60 |
U can't go wrong with a MDX then.. they have 8000$ off 2009 models as well. |
ya MDX is gonna be ur best bet. Cheapest, reliable, , very very nice interior finish/material,decent look, SH-AWD 300hp, 275ish torque sits 7, lots of room. and around $45-55g |
Volvo XC60 ~ looks really nice especially in white. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net