You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Photography LabTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...
I was told this forum would be a good place to get some critique
I shot these a few weeks ago, 4 teams (finland, sweden, usa, canada) competing in a pre-olympic tournament (they are the final teams playing in the 2010 winter olympics)
Mostly shot with 20D + sigma 70-200 f/2.8
Please do not hold back! Go hard or go home on the critique
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Advertisement
Last edited by DCrev; 09-22-2009 at 09:27 PM.
Reason: camera info
hockey is a hard sport too shoot and I've shot a similiar set up when I was shooting hockey back in 2007. (except i was shooting with a canon 70-200).
You have to get tighter crops imo. 5 would be better if the players backs wernt turned, and 3 would be better if it you cropped it more to just be the goalie.
I sold you my sigma 70-200 right?
i like shot 4 the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane
hockey is a hard sport too shoot and I've shot a similiar set up when I was shooting hockey back in 2007. (except i was shooting with a canon 70-200).
You have to get tighter crops imo. 5 would be better if the players backs wernt turned, and 3 would be better if it you cropped it more to just be the goalie.