Lomac | 01-06-2010 04:06 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by EndLeSS8
(Post 6755238)
Pretty sad that Top Gear was being a complete badge-whore on this one.
If it's a great car, it doesn't matter what brand it is. GTR, ZR1, Viper, LFA, they're all great cars. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo
(Post 6755514)
yeah...because GT-R is only a Nissan, so Corvette and Viper are GM and Chrysler. | I think you're missing the point he was trying to make. Apart from the very odd model, Lexus' model line up has always been much like Toyota: Well made, great resell, and generally very reliable. They aren't known for making exciting cars. In Europe especially, where diesels reign king, they're even less exciting than here. As a result, people who look for a luxury sports saloon invariably end up looking towards BMW, Audi, Mercedes, etc; you know, companies that have a history of making powerful, sporty sedans. However, Lexus here has suddenly broken the mould and introduced a car that's much, much more expensive than anything they've ever produced. Think of it as Volkswagen and their attempt at the S-Class and 7ser crowd when they released the Phaeton. It was a fantastic car, but it was out of the brand name's reach. Who would pay $100,000+ for a Volkswagen when you could buy an Audi A8L or BMW 745i instead? Clarkson is saying much the same with the LFA. It's not that the LFA isn't a brilliant car; rather, it's the image associated with the brand. |