Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
01-05-2010, 01:57 PM
|
#1 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Canon announces 70-200 f2.8L IS II USM
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| 
|  | |
01-05-2010, 02:43 PM
|
#2 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
30 day return policy  | |
| | |
01-05-2010, 02:44 PM
|
#3 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
kinda of a knee jerk reaction to the nikon one no?
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 04:11 PM
|
#4 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane  30 day return policy | Any time return policy - I work at the place where I bought it! 
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 04:12 PM
|
#5 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane kinda of a knee jerk reaction to the nikon one no? | Why? The Canon 70-200 is the oldest of the big three's 70-200 f2.8 lenses. It was overdue for an update.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 04:17 PM
|
#6 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
|
waiting to see the price...
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 04:22 PM
|
#7 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
No North American pricing confirmed, but in the UK, 2700 Pounds(!). Estimated price is $2800 USD, according to my source, but again, not confirmed.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 06:02 PM
|
#8 | | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Does that mean we'll be seeing the Mark I go down in price?  | |
| | |
01-05-2010, 10:01 PM
|
#9 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by vietfx Does that mean we'll be seeing the Mark I go down in price? | Do you mean prior to the release of the new lens in April? Possibly, but I'm not sure yet.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-05-2010, 11:09 PM
|
#10 | | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
|
Seeing as a used non IS 70-200 f2.8 goes for $1200USD, $2800USD is extremely steep!
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 12:51 AM
|
#11 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Why? The Canon 70-200 is the oldest of the big three's 70-200 f2.8 lenses. It was overdue for an update. | it seemed fine on digital when I had one.
The nikons suffered from vignetting and soft corners. thats why they were replaced.
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 01:04 AM
|
#12 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane it seemed fine on digital when I had one.
The nikons suffered from vignetting and soft corners. thats why they were replaced. | The current one is a bit soft...you've never used a Sony 70-200 f2.8G have you? That thing is amazing.
The Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR on FF is a bit soft in the corners, the older 80-200 is sharper, but isn't as in the AF department.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 02:16 PM
|
#13 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever No North American pricing confirmed, but in the UK, 2700 Pounds(!). Estimated price is $2800 USD, according to my source, but again, not confirmed. | holy crap!!!
Amazon has the MK I for £1450 right now... this is nearly double the price!!! wtf??
there's a photo expo in a months time, i wonder if they'll have this lens on display....
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 04:16 PM
|
#14 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane it seemed fine on digital when I had one.
The nikons suffered from vignetting and soft corners. thats why they were replaced. | I acutally like the vignetting on the VR1, works well for me for sports/portraits. I don't shoot landscape so corner performance ain't an issue.
These new lenses are so damn expensive that I don't think it's worth the money to upgrade... yet.
Mint Nikon 70-200 VR1~ $1500 CDN
New Nikon 70-200 VR2~ $2700 tax in
Mint Canon 70-200 IS~ $1600 CDN
New Canon 70-200 IS~ $3000 tax in 
Do you get 2x the performance? Hmmmmm doubt it. I guess for working pros this is no big deal but for the rest of us these new lenses are... damn too expensive.
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 05:10 PM
|
#15 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
It seems that with lenses, incremental improvements come at a steep price. I think it's worth the improvement. It may keep some amateurs from buying the lenses for sure. Pros can just write it off, but it's pretty much the price of one day's wedding shoot though.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-06-2010, 05:16 PM
|
#16 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
I'm quite happy with my 70-200 2.8 all though its not the IS version, so i'm good. Here is a site with a few sample pictures, not very many though. http://blog.reddotphoto.com.sg/?p=726
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | |
01-12-2010, 11:07 AM
|
#17 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Philly / NYC
Posts: 1,138
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
$2800 for MKII??? wow........
B&H have the MK I IS for like $1600 USD... thats quite a big difference...
__________________
City of Brotherly Love
Where All Lusts began....
08' AW E92 335i a few mods.....
01' SBM IS300 - Stock. Still running strong after 9+ years and 235k+ kms!!!
| |
| | |
01-28-2010, 01:34 AM
|
#18 | | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The current 70-200 f2.8L IS USM lists for $1999. When the 70-200 f2.8 L IS USM was introduced back in 2001, its suggested list price was about $3000. If the estimate for the MK II is about $2800, it doesn't seem too wild. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0108/01...ef70200f28.asp | |
| | |
01-28-2010, 09:59 AM
|
#19 | | .
Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,221
Thanked 83 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 82 Times in 19 Posts
|
hey Senna,
u think there will be a 70-200 2.8 mk2 non is?
| |
| | |
01-28-2010, 01:59 PM
|
#20 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever It seems that with lenses, incremental improvements come at a steep price. I think it's worth the improvement. It may keep some amateurs from buying the lenses for sure. Pros can just write it off, but it's pretty much the price of one day's wedding shoot though. | probably has something to do with the amount of asphirical lenses/ed elements.
| |
| | |
01-28-2010, 06:27 PM
|
#21 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Domani hey Senna,
u think there will be a 70-200 2.8 mk2 non is? | Not yet - only the IS has been announced. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
01-28-2010, 06:28 PM
|
#22 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane probably has something to do with the amount of asphirical lenses/ed elements. | It has to do with the one flourite element. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
01-28-2010, 10:58 PM
|
#23 | | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever It has to do with the one flourite element. Posted via RS Mobile | Plus 5 UD elements in the MK II vs 4 UD elements in the MK I
| |
| | |
01-29-2010, 01:09 AM
|
#24 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,335
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That price is ridiculous. The only people I can see needing this are those that shoot sports out in the rain or whoever uses their equipment in harsh conditions.
My 70-200 2.8 is my favorite lens :P. lol. If I had disposable income I'd have all their lenses, haha. Damnit...lens lust .
| |
| | |
03-09-2010, 12:24 AM
|
#25 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
So I'm here in Las Vegas attending the WPPI (Wedding & Portrait Photographers International) Trade Show. It's really amazing with all the convention halls full of vendors advertising/selling their products & services that are geared towards wedding/portrait photographers. Canon, Nikon & Sony have HUGE booths showcasing pretty much their entire line-up of camera bodies and lenses. I got to play with and shoot with the new Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS II, and it's fucking amazing. The AF is an order of magnitude faster than the v1.0, more accurate and sharp as hell. I always thought the 5DmkII just had slow AF, but in this case, its definitely the lens, not the body. I have a meeting with the Canon people tomorrow, so I'll be able to do a more thorough test.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:10 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
