![]() |
Quote:
|
Looks decent, aside from the two verticle lines in the front bumper giving it triangular grills. Lancer hatchback tails? |
Quote:
|
Starting with Mazda 2. Honestly FWD manuals are never very good.. the only manuals I would consider are longitudinal ones. Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
not bad actually :) |
Quote:
|
To those who think Mazda > Ford, what do you think of the Mazdaspeed cars? Cuz' the engines in those cars wouldn't exist without technology provided by Ford as Mazda doesn't have the technology to make such an engine. A lot of Mazda products wouldn't exist if it weren't for Ford lending them expertise and technology to allow their construction. To me that makes Ford > Mazda since they clearly have better technology than Mazda. |
Quote:
For example: The duratec is an adaptation of the Mazda MZR motor. I'd say without Mazda being involved with Ford for the past so many years, Ford wouldn't have been able to up their game to where it is today. |
^ The Direct Injection used in Mazda is Ford tehcnology - Mazda doesn't have DI tech. Neither does Toyota who licensed it from Ford in a technology transfer where they got hybrid tech from Toyota. |
Quote:
|
^Which was in 2001/2002 |
Quote:
"Beginning in 2004, Ford dropped the old 4-cylinder Zetec engines in favor of Mazda's MZR design. Thus, 2005 and present Duratec 4-cylinder engines are Mazdas" "The Zetec was superseded by the Duratec series of engines, originally called RoFlow Zetec. These are based on the Mazda MZR engines. "The Duratec 23 is a 2.3 L (140 CID; 2261 cc)[2] variant of the Mazda MZR 2.3 L engine." -Wiki |
Looks good, inside and out. It was about time, Ford's headed in the right direction |
Quote:
|
That does look great. While I generally would not purchase a car from the North American big three this looks promising. It reminds me of the former Focus SVT, which I think was a great car. |
What difference does it make who designed the power train as long as it's good??? And all the in-house developed powertrains in the current Fords (and Mazdas and Volvos) are awesome. Look at the Ram for example. Everyone loves a Ram with a Cummins engine. Guess what, the best part of that truck is NOT made by Dodge, it's made by Cummins. What is the #1 complaint about 2008-2010 Ford F350's? That the diesel burns too much fuel. Guess what, the diesel is actually made by Navistar, not Ford. But in the end, no one cares who makes the motor. If the Navistar motor is bad, it makes the whole Ford F350 look bad. And if the motor is good, it makes the whole car look good, even if it's made by a totally different brand. People want the car to LOOK good and PERFORM good and be RELIABLE. They don't care about where it's made or any of that stuff. Very few people I talk to mention the cross-breeding between mazda and ford, even fewer actually understand the benefits of it. Sometimes I talk to people who are enthusiastic about buying an Edge, MKX, Flex, or MKT because it's actually made in Canada, but even that is pretty rare. |
looks pertty nice and good for a daily driver! |
Quote:
I knew I saw those tail lights somewhere!! :lol |
^ Except the Lancer Sportback looks uglier |
I'm actually looking forward to a Ford, lol, Could this be the start of a new begining for Ford? =O |
Quote:
|
FORD Rocks now, Just got a new ford and cant wait for my next purchase for my wife :) (most liekly a ford also) |
wow.. haha looks like they crammed everything into that dash! |
why are u guys arguing over useless facts you should all just be praying that ford brings over the Focus RS!!!! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net