Built by Chinese - MG6
 

http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...11600x1060.jpg
http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...61600x1060.jpg
http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...31600x1060.jpg
http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...61600x1060.jpg
http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...01600x1060.jpg
http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...41600x1060.jpg

What is it?
The car with which the MG brand is to be reintroduced to the British market: this is the new MG6.

Designed and developed in the UK at SAIC’s technical centre at Longbridge, the MG6 is a medium-sized family hatchback that’s roughly the same size as a Skoda Octavia. Based on the Chinese-built Roewe 550, this car can actually trace its roots all the way back to the Rover 75. However, for the MG version, the car’s engine, chassis, body and interior have all been overhauled.

Current MG brand owners SAIC has plans to build these cars at MG Rover’s old Longbridge plant for sale across the UK. Our test car, however, was one of several built at SAIC’s Nanjing factory, for the official Chinese press launch of the car.

What’s it like?
The MG6 is remarkably daring- and original-looking, considering that it’s intended primarily for the notoriously conservative Chinese market. Wide tracks, flared arches, large external styling features and some surprisingly sophisticated surfaces give it a bold, sporty and contemporary appearance, even relative to European rivals.

The car’s cabin is all new and bears no resemblance to that of the Rover 75 or MG ZT. The materials used aren’t as rich or tactile as you’ll find in some European family saloons, but the built quality is good: switches and levers move with firmness and solidity.

Shanghai Automotive will offer two versions of the MG6, both front-driven via a 5-speed automatic gearbox, and both powered by its ‘N-series’ update of Rover’s old 1.8-litre ‘K-series’ engine.

The entry-level car develops 133bhp and 135lb ft or torque. The range-topping turbo, which we drove, gets 158bhp and 158lb ft, and SAIC claims that it’ll hit 60mph in 8.5sec before going on to a top speed of 130mph.

Out on the road, the MG6 feels firmly suspended, but performs well. That engine suffers a little from turbo lag below 2500rpm, but spins freely way up to its 6750rpm redline. The car has good stability and composure, resisting body roll well through corners, and riding mid-bend bumps at speed without being diverted by them.

Ride comfort and refinement could both be improved. On our test drive, rattles were evident from within our test car’s dashboard, a problem exacerbated by the MG6’s firm ride.

Also disappointing was the car’s five-speed torque converter gearbox. At times it was frustratingly unresponsive and slow to kick down. A good six-speed manual ‘box will be a necessity if SAIC want to market this car as a sporting saloon here in the UK.

Should I buy one?
Given that we’ve only tried a Chinese-built model on Chinese roads, it’s too early to say with any certainty. Longbridge-built cars are likely to be better finished, better equipped and could have their own chassis set-up tailored to suit UK tastes. The MG6 will certainly need to be improved in all three areas in order to make much of an impression over here.

However, provided SAIC can make those gains, and offer this car to UK buyers with a price tag that’s attractive, it won’t struggle to sell the MG6 in Britain. The MG6 is a car that’s already good enough to compete with those built in joint ventures between Chinese and European makers, and could quite easily be made competitive by European class standards.

With the MG badge on its nose, it has the potential to make big improvements to the reputation of the Chinese car industry in Europe.

Imagine if some1 just went and found a whole bunch of articles online and posted them all on revscene at once...What a fucking loser that guy would be...

well its DESIGNED in UK thats y it doesn't look like a pos copy

you fool

ugly rims

I like it.

it's just too bad it only comes in auto. =(

It be funny reading the owners manual translated into english. Probably sound total ghetto fob. As long as it passes strict lead poison tests, then it might be worthwhile if its damn cheap. I wonder if they have a climate control system in there, that lets you change the weather, make it rain or sunny by shooting shit into the sky to fuck with mother nature...that would be cool!

Chinese government should make everyone buy this otherwise get their asses driven over by tanks! If they run out, then you can buy other cars.

:facepalm:

Surrey has the dumbest people on Earth

LMFAO!!

POS


1.8T and barely gets 160hp lol

I dunno IMO it looks like bits and pieces of other cars put together...

maybe a bit of buick regal?
http://www.motorward.com/wp-content/...k-regal-41.jpg

car is nice but I can't get over the new name for Rover

Roewe or something rofl. WHY do you have to make the name similar yet sound so fobbish?

http://cdn.images.autocar.co.uk/612x...61600x1060.jpg

http://www.desktopcar.net/wallpaper/...-coupe_156.jpg

The back is awfully similar.

no really?
http://img2.netcarshow.com/Nissan-Pr...llpaper_03.jpg
2006+ Nissan Primera probably "inspired" it but I would think it's just coincidence.

looks great wait till you crash , you die

looks good and solid.

but chinese car reputation = poor safety but cheap
domestic(can/usa) reputation = poor reliability but cheap
japanese reputation = efficient/reliable/durable but expensive
german reputation = luxury/prestige but expensive
italy reputation = exotic but super expensive

china = human photocopying machine...???
Posted via RS Mobile

china aint a human, you meant to say Country copying machine

All these Chinese cars remind me of that TVB drama