REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   USED Photography Equipment ONLY (https://www.revscene.net/forums/used-photography-equipment-only_227/)
-   -   FS: 5D mark II mint condition (https://www.revscene.net/forums/607315-fs-5d-mark-ii-mint-condition.html)

57x 03-01-2010 11:46 AM
FS: 5D mark II mint condition
 
Like new 5D II body (a week old)
About 300 exposures

comes with everything it came with and box, paid $3350 for it.

selling for: $2950 OBO

Senna4ever 03-06-2010 12:05 AM
Err... they go for $2900 new now....

niforpix 03-06-2010 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57x (Post 6838560)
Like new 5D II body (a week old)
About 300 exposures

comes with everything it came with and box, paid $3350 for it.

selling for: $2950 OBO
Damn, you got ripped off. Where did you buy it from? You can't just return it?

57x 03-07-2010 05:55 PM
london drugs was 2999+tx.. I lost the receipt so I thought I would try rs before trying to see if they would accept a return w/o a receipt.

honestly I don't care anymore.. I'll use this for a bit. It just feels slow compared to something like a 7D

a_dee 03-07-2010 10:03 PM
two totally different cameras for two separate uses.. if you need speed for sports, then stick with the 7D or 1D

niforpix 03-07-2010 10:25 PM
^^ I'm sure they have your receipt on the computer considering it was a $3,000 purchase. Why would you wanna lose $400 just like that? And yeah, 5D has lower FPS but it's FF and the noise levels are way lower than 7D.

57x 03-07-2010 10:51 PM
I was aiming for a 1Ds, the 5D was a compromise on speed and af since I wanted the full frame. noise levels are not that much better than my old 20d.. but then again I've hardly used it

woodychau 03-08-2010 12:28 AM
i will give you 1500 for it... = )

J____ 03-08-2010 03:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57x (Post 6848869)
noise levels are not that much better than my old 20d.. but then again I've hardly used it
r u kidding? i have a 20D and 5Dmk2, the 5Dmk2 noise at 6400iso was comparable to my 20D at 1600iso. HUGE difference

niforpix 03-08-2010 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57x (Post 6848869)
I was aiming for a 1Ds, the 5D was a compromise on speed and af since I wanted the full frame. noise levels are not that much better than my old 20d.. but then again I've hardly used it
Um... maybe it's good that you're selling it then lol

57x 03-08-2010 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ (Post 6849107)
r u kidding? i have a 20D and 5Dmk2, the 5Dmk2 noise at 6400iso was comparable to my 20D at 1600iso. HUGE difference
yeah I'll go try it out again.. I've only done 1 or 2 shots at 6400 and I was not impressed. and the 1Ds 3 was much cleaner at 3200 vs 3200

niforpix 03-08-2010 07:24 PM
If you want really clean shots, go with Nikon D3s. Beats Canon 1D MKIV.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net