Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |  | |
04-24-2010, 12:53 PM
|
#1 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Polarizing Filters on Ebay
Anyone have any thoughts on 'cheapo' polarizing filters on ebay? Do they work decently, or is it absolutely necessary to spend money on a more expensive filter?
|
| |
04-24-2010, 01:22 PM
|
#2 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 893 Times in 352 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
|
they work in terms of the polarizing effect, but the glass quality is prolly crap. So if you're putting these $10 filters on your $1500 L lens, you waste your $1500.
__________________ yolo |
| |
04-24-2010, 01:23 PM
|
#3 | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
cheap CPL filters (i'm talking <$10 for a 58mm) still work as described. the picture just isn't sharp that's all.
what lens are you using it for? if it's a lens you plan on keeping for a long time then get a nice filter. maxsaver.net. excellent prices.
|
| |
04-24-2010, 02:35 PM
|
#4 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
Sorry I don't mean to hijack the thread, but it's still somewhat on topic.
What's your take on using step-up rings? Does it really decrease IQ? For example, I want to invest in a good CPL and a few ND filters, but I don't want to buy some for each of my lenses (or rather, my future lenses). I want to buy a 77mm and hopefully use step-up rings for my 72mm sigma, and upcoming 67/77mm 70-200 mm. The uwa lens I plan on getting is also 77mm.
If step-up rings are kosher, what's the limit on number of rings to use? Obviously I wouldn't use a 77 on my nifty- but what's your take on it.
|
| |
04-24-2010, 03:50 PM
|
#5 | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
didn't think step-up rings decreased IQ at all since there is no glass on them at all
only concern is vignetting when using a wide angle. i think the more you stack, the less wide you can go. like compare a 58->67 + 67->77 to a 58->77
|
| |
04-24-2010, 03:56 PM
|
#6 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
ah yeah i knew that issue. luckily my kit is 72, and the uwa that i'll eventually get is a 77 so the vignetting will be kept to a minimum.
I guess the thing I was worried about was having that void space between the filter and the lens element increasing opportunities for light bounce. probably unwarranted though. thanks!
|
| |
04-24-2010, 04:31 PM
|
#7 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonone cheap CPL filters (i'm talking <$10 for a 58mm) still work as described. the picture just isn't sharp that's all.
what lens are you using it for? if it's a lens you plan on keeping for a long time then get a nice filter. maxsaver.net. excellent prices. | Yea, good call. Definitely a lens I want to keep for a long time.. its thes 16-85mm Nikkor.
Ok, sounds good, it is decided. A B&W circular polarizer it is |
| |
04-24-2010, 09:52 PM
|
#8 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonone cheap CPL filters (i'm talking <$10 for a 58mm) still work as described. the picture just isn't sharp that's all.
what lens are you using it for? if it's a lens you plan on keeping for a long time then get a nice filter. maxsaver.net. excellent prices. | no they are a piece of crap that would probably fall apart or have crap inside between the glass. I would rather buy a purple hoya instead of some crap <$10 ebay filters.
Honestly go with some better filters, especially name brand ones. You can't go wrong with B+W, Hoya, Tiffen, Rodenstock, etc. Obviously they would be more expensive, but will last probably longer than your no name, and they would produce a better image.
If you can afford an L lens, you can afford to put nice filters on IMO.
B+W Kaesemann |
| |
04-24-2010, 11:58 PM
|
#9 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Try http://maxsaver.net/ for cheaper brand name filters, if u're on a budget.
__________________ All hail 2.3 turbo RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana" http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap |
| |
04-25-2010, 12:04 AM
|
#10 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Stay away from Tiffens too.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
05-01-2010, 01:25 AM
|
#11 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 893 Times in 352 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
|
If ur looking for uv, I recently got a hoya super HMC uv and it's awesome! Compared to my b+w fpro, it has visibly way less reflections due to the coatings. I angle the lens to catch a lightbulb reflection and I can barely see any on the hoya, whereas on b+w it's pretty significant. Looking at the lens with the hoya i can't even tell there's a filter on it from the lack of a glare reflection! But cleaning is a bitch at first. First time I cleaned it, it'd smudge and would not clean. Even with lens fluid, it was the same. Eventually though after some rubbing it became easy to clean like normal glass... I guess some sort or coating got rubbed off. Haha. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
05-01-2010, 02:07 AM
|
#12 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
B+W single coat is ok...MRC is the way to go if you buy B+W.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
05-01-2010, 10:41 AM
|
#13 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
Yea, I have a B+W MRC UV as a daily protector on mine.. and that thing virtually is fingerprint proof. Crazy easy to clean too.
I've decided I'll probably get a Hoya HD CPL filter for polarizing things..
|
| |
05-01-2010, 11:05 PM
|
#14 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,944
Thanked 13,521 Times in 1,745 Posts
Failed 2,239 Times in 545 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo Anyone have any thoughts on 'cheapo' polarizing filters on ebay? Do they work decently, or is it absolutely necessary to spend money on a more expensive filter? | Don't buy cheap ones... they are comeplete fucking shit.
I paid $60 almost 2 years ago for one, it was a Hoya and the this filter was great. In stores it sold for $100+... but filter is gone now since i broke it.
I recently bought two filters from ebay, paid $50 in total, and the shipping was free. They are some random name, i got them in a pretty case and the description makes them seem so good... but they hardly even rotate like they should, complete junk and wasted money.
So when buying filters from ebay, only buy good and known brands.
__________________ PHOTOGRAPHY / FLICKR |
| |
05-02-2010, 09:18 PM
|
#15 | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 43
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 38 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Levitron | they've got the best prices, i just ordered a few more filters from them for my new lense, highly recommended!
|
| |
05-02-2010, 09:20 PM
|
#16 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 893 Times in 352 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
|
just ordered a 82mm hoya HD cpl off them. $12 cheaper than on ebay with free shipping.
__________________ yolo |
| |
05-02-2010, 09:30 PM
|
#17 | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 43
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 38 Times in 2 Posts
|
oh nice, which 82mm lense do you have?
I'm thinking of getting the ZE 21/2.8
|
| |
05-03-2010, 01:23 AM
|
#18 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 893 Times in 352 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
|
16-35L mk2
__________________ yolo |
| |
05-03-2010, 04:54 PM
|
#19 | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 43
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 38 Times in 2 Posts
|
oh nice, i am considering that lens, how do you find it?
do you mainly use it for landscape or people shots also? or?
just curious
thx
|
| |
05-03-2010, 08:44 PM
|
#20 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 893 Times in 352 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
|
it's awesome. I rarely use it for people. mostly landscape and interior. it's good if you need the extra speed. but otherwise a 17-40 would do for half the price. The image is marginally better than the 17-40 but not worth 2x the price imo if you dont need the speed.
the 16-35 mk1 is worse than the 17-40 though, so stay away from it.
__________________ yolo |
| |
05-03-2010, 10:55 PM
|
#21 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
Another very good polarizing filter that I had great exp. with is Singh-ray. reasonably priced for amazing quality product.
__________________
Nothing for now
|
| |
05-03-2010, 11:13 PM
|
#22 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
I just picked up a Hoya HD CPL after doing a ton of research. I probably would have gone for the B&W MRC CPL, but I think $130 its a bit much!
|
| |
05-17-2010, 09:33 AM
|
#23 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
Did I get hosed?
"This product is licesed by Hoya"
The filter I picked up on Ebay says Genuine, the rest of the packaging and the filter seem very genuine. The build quality is very very good. I'm not sure what to think right now..
Last edited by LiquidTurbo; 05-17-2010 at 10:15 AM.
|
| |
05-17-2010, 10:06 AM
|
#24 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
That's the usual packaging for Hoya HD.
But the best C/P ratio filter is still Hoya HMC. Anything beyond that show very minimal improvement (sometimes even worse in term of reflection).
This is what I think after having experienced with almost every filter brand out there. (I'm a gearhead.  and for every lens I get, I purchase a new filter if they don't come with one, and not always the same brand)
Some short review on each filter:
Hoya HMC: Best C/P. Almost minimal glare and fairly cheap on fleebay
Hoya Super HMC: Can't tell a difference between this and HMC, in the 2 samples I got, one of the actually have a tiny hint more of reflection than HMC.
B+W MRC: Very good glare suppression with excellent light-pass capability (sometimes noticeable on vignette-heavy lenses) but $$$$$
B+W non-MRC: Garbage, don't waste your money, might as well go HMC, better product at lower price. Only thing worth mentioning is construction. They are excellent as any other B+W product.
Kenko Zeta: The top-of-the-line filter from Kenko. Expensive, best glare suppression I have seen to date on a UV filter. But not worth the price against HMC.
Nikon: Newer generation are great, but again, not worth the money. The older generation without coating is useless.
Canon: garbage. Do not buy unless you have a thing with Canon. Only good thing from Canon is close-up filters.
Sony Zeiss T*: Very expensive stuff. But the best filter I've used to date. If you want the absolute best stuff, get this.
Heliopan: Awesome quality and performance. But again, very pricy and I'd rather go HMC unless you want the square filter system.
Singh-Ray: Perhaps the best ND filter out there. Although without coating, hence little to none glare suppression, but color shift is kept to minimal (on my D700 at least)
__________________
Nothing for now
Last edited by Hehe; 05-17-2010 at 10:17 AM.
|
| |
05-17-2010, 10:15 AM
|
#25 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
^
It's usual for Hoya to have a spelling mistake?
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM. |