REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2010, 10:21 AM   #26
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,738
Thanked 5,279 Times in 1,945 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunny_j View Post
if you have to drill down that deep to plant the nuke why not drill a little further for the relief well.
Exactly.
Advertisement
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 05:11 PM   #27
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,650
Thanked 348 Times in 165 Posts
Failed 127 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
what does Chernobyl have anything to do with nuclear weapons? You do know that Chernobyl was a power plant that blew up right? Russians didnt drop a nuclear bomb on the city of Chernobyl. it's ignorant retards like you that make up the majority of the population which is the cause of a lot of the worlds problems.
The disaster clearly shows that the Russians are not competent with their nuclear technology. I mean they can't even properly operate a nuclear power plant without fucking things up for the rest of Europe.

So do you think the U.S. Government and BP is going to listen to the Russian's proposal on using a Nuclear bomb? HELL NO. The worst thing can happen is the nuke fails to stop the leak and we have not just oil spill but nuclear oil spill as well.

And by this article (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/us/03nuke.html) it doesn't seem I am alone on this point.
Carl Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:25 AM   #28
My homepage has been set to RS
 
goo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Van
Posts: 2,050
Thanked 192 Times in 118 Posts
Failed 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
what does Chernobyl have anything to do with nuclear weapons?
the nuke part, radiation, cancer..
goo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 02:00 AM   #29
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,457
Thanked 2,259 Times in 439 Posts
Failed 595 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunny_j View Post
if you have to drill down that deep to plant the nuke why not drill a little further for the relief well.

umm i'm not sure it's as easy as that.
in this instance, i believe there are other factors affecting it!

i'm not sure what those factors are because i'm not really following it, but i vaguely remember on the news that you can't just drill down and cut it off
TheKingdom2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 03:28 AM   #30
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
Yes, the Chernobyl disaster has nothing to do with nuclear weapons, but the fact that something screwed up there means that Russia's nuclear technology may not be the greatest... Therefore, don't take their proposed nuke solution for the oil slick as the silver bullet.
How about melt downs that have occured in the states? It seems like noone knows about china syndrome.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:53 AM   #31
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,738
Thanked 5,279 Times in 1,945 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
How about melt downs that have occured in the states? It seems like noone knows about china syndrome.
Three Mile Island was the only "Meltdown" in the USA, and it was a partial one at that, mostly due to mechanical failure.

Chernobyl was caused by operators knowingly running the reactor outside of design parameters, and ignoring clear warning signs.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:54 AM   #32
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
Russia has over 30 nuclear reactors currently in operation. Some of the nuclear powerplants have been set up in the late 1960's and are still operational today. So 1 reactor meltdown out of 30+ in 50 years of operations does not make the Russians incompetent with their nuclear technology... people need to take a second and read the actual facts, not eat up everything they see on TV and take it as the truth... the north american media only shows what they WANT the public to see. there is a whole another world out there if you just take a second and look.
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:58 AM   #33
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,515
Thanked 3,617 Times in 1,408 Posts
Failed 142 Times in 70 Posts
^
Unfortunately, that is very true, and I'm often guilty of only seeing the NA point of view...
__________________
Do Not Put Aftershave on Your Balls. -604CEFIRO
Looks like I'm gonna have some hot sex again tonight...OOPS i got the 6 pack. that wont last me the night, I better go back and get the 24 pack! -Turbo E
kinda off topic but obama is a dilf - miss_crayon
Honest to fucking Christ the easiest way to get a married woman in the mood is clean the house and do the laundry.....I've been with the same girl almost 17 years, ask me how I know. - quasi
Gumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 08:08 AM   #34
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
some facts about Chernobyl and Three Mile Island Meltdowns:

Chernobyl:
At this plant the worst reactor disaster to ever occur took place on April 26, 1986. It happened largely because normal reactor operations were suspended; an experiment was to take place in the reactor. As a result, normal safety guidelines were disregarded, and the accident occurred.

What caused the accident? This is a very hard question to answer. The obvious one is operator error. The operator was not very familiar with the reactor and hadn't been trained enough. Additionally, when the accident occurred, normal safety rules were not being followed because they were running a test. For example, regulations required that at least 15 control rods always remain in the reactor. When the explosion occurred, less than 10 were present. This happened because many of the rods were removed to raise power output. This was one of the direct causes of the accident. Also, the reactor itself was not designed well and was prone to abrupt and massive power surges.

Three Mile Island:
Unit 2 experienced a partial reactor meltdown on March 28, 1979. A partial nuclear meltdown is when the uranium fuel rods start to liquefy, but they do not fall through the reactor floor and breach the containment systems. The accident which occurred at Unit 2 is considered to be the worst nuclear disaster in US history. Why did it happen? There are many reasons for the accident, but the two main ones are simple human error and the failure of a rather minor valve in the reactor.

See anything similar? Both accidents occured due to operator error. How does that make Russia incompetent in Nuclear Technology?
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:46 AM   #35
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,738
Thanked 5,279 Times in 1,945 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post

See anything similar? Both accidents occured due to operator error. How does that make Russia incompetent in Nuclear Technology?
The difference is that in Chernobyl, the operators intentionally put the plant into an unsafe situation - by performing their tests when they knew how bad the positive voide coefficient (shitty design) of that RBMK reactor was.

In Three Mile Island the operator error occurred with how they dealt with unexpected mechanical failure. It was much more accidental.

In my opinion there's a big difference between the two. I would rather not risk a nuclear power plant's safety needlessly. The soviets thought otherwise I guess.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:50 AM   #36
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
The difference is that in Chernobyl, the operators intentionally put the plant into an unsafe situation - by performing their tests when they knew how bad the positive voide coefficient (shitty design) of that RBMK reactor was.

In Three Mile Island the operator error occurred was with how they dealt with unexpected mechanical failure. It was much more accidental.

In my opinion there's a big difference between the two. I would rather not risk a nuclear power plant's safety needlessly. The soviets thought otherwise I guess.
at this point its all just speculation. who knows, if they left the reactor alone, it could have exploded on its own 5 years down the road due to it's "shitty" design. instead they took the risk to test it and see if it was capable of handling the stress... then we all know what happened
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:15 PM   #37
Ready to be Man handled by RS!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 91
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
Controlled Nuclear Blast under seabed....

birth of Godzilla 10 years later?
weitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net