REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Gaming, Computer Tech & Electronics (https://www.revscene.net/forums/gaming-computer-tech-electronics_32/)
-   -   Who makes the most reliable spinny drives these days? (https://www.revscene.net/forums/625174-who-makes-most-reliable-spinny-drives-these-days.html)

rk604 09-19-2010 02:16 PM

I had WD in the past, switched to seagate 2 years ago and the seagate crapped out after about a year, the Rma process is ridiculous for seagate, so I switched back to WD.

My WS that's been running for about 7-8years is still going strong, so I'm definitely sticking with them from now on
Posted via RS Mobile

bcrdukes 09-19-2010 03:18 PM

Kind of off-topic, guys (sorry OP)

Is it true that Seagate bought Maxtor? If so, could this takeover possibly explain the poor RMA process and quality of HDDs?

Just a thought.

!MiKrofT 09-19-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragonone (Post 7111249)
at that price, you mind as well buy twice or even three times amount of drives for backup. heck, even pay for cloud service

i'm still on a black + green on my desktop, but i'm recommending an ssd + green more now

This is similar to my setup too. I have 1 SSD OS drive and 3 WD blacks. 1 for downloads and 2 for storage in RAID.

!MiKrofT 09-19-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcrdukes (Post 7111351)
Kind of off-topic, guys (sorry OP)

Is it true that Seagate bought Maxtor? If so, could this takeover possibly explain the poor RMA process and quality of HDDs?

Just a thought.

You are right:

http://www.maxtor.com/home-en-us.html

Maxtor is now Seagate.

SkinnyPupp 09-19-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcrdukes (Post 7111351)
Kind of off-topic, guys (sorry OP)

Is it true that Seagate bought Maxtor? If so, could this takeover possibly explain the poor RMA process and quality of HDDs?

Just a thought.

No. For one, the quality of Seagate drives are very good. Secondly, their RMA process is very good as well.

They use the Maxtor drives for low end devices, like the cheaper external drives, etc.

bcrdukes 09-19-2010 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7111600)
No. For one, the quality of Seagate drives are very good. Secondly, their RMA process is very good as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rk604 (Post 7111295)
I had WD in the past, switched to seagate 2 years ago and the seagate crapped out after about a year, the Rma process is ridiculous for seagate, so I switched back to WD.

For the sake of discussion, rk604 had a different experience. Details?

Soundy 09-19-2010 07:47 PM

We install high-end surveillance DVRs, some using four- and eight-drive RAID5 arrays, all of which can REALLY put a strain on drives, with sustained 24/7 read/write access. We've seen a lot of different drives come and go (including a ton of those Maxtor thin drives blowing up). Currently we're using the 1TB and 2TB WD Blacks and been very happy with them. One site, we've had four of eight Seagate 1TB Barracudas in an array fail (all within barely two years of service, the first within a few months), and replaced them all with the Blacks.

John 09-19-2010 07:59 PM

There was a problem with the Seagate 7200.11 series a couple years ago. The problem was fixed with a firmware upgrade. This is still ingrained in lot of peoples memories. A lot of these drives are still running and failing as we speak. You can include these in your sample data or you can ignore them, depending on your viewpoint.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/...200-11-failing

The 7200.11s being sold now should all be OK.

mb_ 09-19-2010 08:49 PM

1 black, 1 green on my main, 1 green on home server that's rarely used and another black on fam computer.. all reliable!

!MiKrofT 09-19-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soundy (Post 7111622)
We install high-end surveillance DVRs, some using four- and eight-drive RAID5 arrays, all of which can REALLY put a strain on drives, with sustained 24/7 read/write access. We've seen a lot of different drives come and go (including a ton of those Maxtor thin drives blowing up). Currently we're using the 1TB and 2TB WD Blacks and been very happy with them. One site, we've had four of eight Seagate 1TB Barracudas in an array fail (all within barely two years of service, the first within a few months), and replaced them all with the Blacks.

Those maxtor thin drives were the worst lol. We had so many RMA's come back at my old place.

Great68 09-20-2010 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psb1 (Post 7110894)
Don't buy spin drives unless you're content with old technology
Go SSD drives if you can afford them.
You will not regret it. Read & Write times are incredible.
If you want to go crazy fast then get dual SSD and install a raid 0.

I can't exactly justify spending $3000 just to get 1TB of SSD...

Spinny drives still have their purpose.

Psb1 09-20-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great68 (Post 7112075)
I can't exactly justify spending $3000 just to get 1TB of SSD...

Spinny drives still have their purpose.

Well I couldn't justify maintaining a ford mustang but you seem to think it money worth spending
Different strokes for different folks I guess.
For the computer savvy high tech geeks the cost of SSD's is worth it for the performance gains.
I'm one of the few who has to have the latest technology.
Yes its expensive but relative to things like cars, houses, kids, college its not that much.

!MiKrofT 09-20-2010 01:28 PM

Uhh I don't know any computer tech savvy geeks that would get that large of an ssd. Tech savvy ppl use an ssd for the operating system and regular drive for storage. Why you need instant access to file storage is beyond me. Ie. Your not gonna get any benefits streaming video on ssd vs. Regular drive.
Posted via RS Mobile

Cman333 09-20-2010 04:59 PM

I run WD's now.

I used to run Segates, but after all the commotion about faulty drives I changed everything to WD Blacks upon most people recommendations.

I'm running a couple green for storage drives, so far no issues.

FerrariEnzo 09-20-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !MiKrofT (Post 7111132)
It's a complete waste of money if you're using it for storage.

if your a big online storage company, or even medium to large corporations, then its worth it.. but for personal use, its not worth it... UNLESS your SUPER RICH!

!MiKrofT 09-21-2010 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7112767)
if your a big online storage company, or even medium to large corporations, then its worth it.. but for personal use, its not worth it... UNLESS your SUPER RICH!

Uhh.. Why on earth would a big online storage company or even medium to large corp. use extremely expensive SSD's when they can buy a shitload of cheaper, larger, and inexpensively replaced spinning drives. That is defnitely not worth it and definitely not the case. As mentioned regular drives are more than adequate for data storage.

Euro7r 09-21-2010 01:21 AM

Hard drives are quite cheap nowadays. You can get a 1TB for like $50buxs at NCIX from their weekly sales. I'm planning to get some WD HD's to use as backup storage.

Meowjin 09-21-2010 01:39 AM

Skinnypupp. I checked my work email and it was a 8tb server raid something or another. Forgot the model name.

I hope that clears it up.

I misread it for a 2tb cavier green

Soundy 09-21-2010 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !MiKrofT (Post 7113408)
Uhh.. Why on earth would a big online storage company or even medium to large corp. use extremely expensive SSD's when they can buy a shitload of cheaper, larger, and inexpensively replaced spinning drives. That is defnitely not worth it and definitely not the case. As mentioned regular drives are more than adequate for data storage.

On top of that, spinny drives are still more reliable for long-term and sustained use. There's an extensive discussion on using them for video storage on a LinkedIn surveillance group, and the fact is, after a LOT of read/write operations and sustained access, they start to see cell failures and data corruption.

dink 09-21-2010 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John (Post 7111653)
There was a problem with the Seagate 7200.11 series a couple years ago. The problem was fixed with a firmware upgrade. This is still ingrained in lot of peoples memories. A lot of these drives are still running and failing as we speak. You can include these in your sample data or you can ignore them, depending on your viewpoint.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/...200-11-failing

The 7200.11s being sold now should all be OK.

Yes... I bought one a year ago, it failed on me 6 months later and I sent it in for warranty, there was a $20 charge for replacement... I got the same model drive back.... failed again 6 months later. I just said fuck it an bought a WD.

Great68 09-21-2010 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psb1 (Post 7112366)
Well I couldn't justify maintaining a ford mustang but you seem to think it money worth spending

That's a terrible analogy.

The big difference is that the Mustang APPRECIATES in value as more money is put into it.

A $3000 SSD Drive in your computer will NEVER appreciate in value. In fact in a few years it will be next to worthless.

!MiKrofT 09-21-2010 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soundy (Post 7113504)
On top of that, spinny drives are still more reliable for long-term and sustained use. There's an extensive discussion on using them for video storage on a LinkedIn surveillance group, and the fact is, after a LOT of read/write operations and sustained access, they start to see cell failures and data corruption.

Yeah I would never use an SSD for video recording. It's a total waste of $$ for what it is as well.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net