REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2011, 12:25 PM   #1
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,005
Thanked 7,380 Times in 3,462 Posts
Hyundai Veloster what the CRX replacement should have been





Lightweight 40MPG 6 speed manual 138HP with a 175HP turbo version coming and rumors of the 274HP Sonata engine also going in there. Looks like a real winner to me.

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=20623

Hyundai's Veloster will get 40 mpg on the highway without the use of hybrid technology

We've talked about Hyundai's Veloster on a few occasions here at DailyTech. These days, many companies are using expensive electric motors and lithium-ion batteries to achieve 40+ mpg in their vehicles. Hyundai, however, is sticking to lightweight platforms and advanced engines to achieve the same feat.

The latest "40 mpg" addition to the family is the 2012 Veloster, which is quite odd being that it has three passenger doors in addition to a traditional rear hatch. The driver's side of the vehicle has a single door, while the passenger's side of the vehicle has a shortened front door and a small rear door to aid in accessing the rear seat.

When it comes to the vehicle specifications, Hyundai has managed to keep curb weight to a minimum at just 2,584 pounds in 6-speed manual form. The six-speed, dual-clutch transmission (DCT) version weighs in at 2,657 pounds. Power comes from a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine that develops just 138 hp.

Hyundai says that a Veloster equipped with a DCT will get up to 40 mpg on the highway. The company, however, has not disclosed EPA city ratings for either transmission or highway ratings for the Veloster equipped with a 6-speed manual.

The Veloster will come standard with a 7" touch screen with integrated Pandora Radio support. Hyundai's new BlueLink telematics system will also be included as standard equipment.

Now we come to the styling. The Veloster is likely to draw love it/hate it comments from people who lay eyes on it. While its style is certainly distinctive, it's asymmetric design, bulges, and gaping front bumper are sure to find a fair share of critics.

However, there are two things that play into the Veloster favor. First off, Hyundai officials state that the vehicle will start at a relatively affordable $17,000, which is not bad for a sporty vehicle with good EPA numbers. The second "plus" for the Veloster won't come until sometime next year. Edmunds Inside Line reports that the Veloster will get the a turbocharged version of the 1.6-liter engine good for around 175hp -- the Sonata Turbo's 274hp, 2.0T engine is also a distant possibility. That should make for quite a little "pocket rocket", but won’t do Hyundai any favors when it comes to EPA numbers.
Advertisement
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-11-2011, 12:36 PM   #2
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Qmx323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,778
Thanked 2,543 Times in 840 Posts
lookin' good hyundai
Qmx323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:01 PM   #3
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,584
Thanked 4,578 Times in 934 Posts
considering the sonata turbo get 34 MPG with the 2.0L turbo i would imagine it would get even better mileage in the much lighter Veloster.

I would also think that 1.6L Turbo in a veloster could get 40 MPG and would expect it to have over 200hp considering the 2.0L makes 275
vitaminG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:32 PM   #4
I AM
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,466
Thanked 1,329 Times in 294 Posts
the ass looks like a crz/370z mix...
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:46 PM   #5
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
I hate that I love you Hyundai....

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:50 PM   #6
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Jgresch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PM
Posts: 4,476
Thanked 3,340 Times in 841 Posts
in b4 jpark orgasm
Jgresch is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-11-2011, 02:39 PM   #7
Banned (ABWS)
 
orange7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MacLeod
Posts: 7,298
Thanked 542 Times in 289 Posts
wow.

I love that design!
orange7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:12 PM   #8
Prince of the Apes
 
bloodmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,469
Thanked 3,046 Times in 672 Posts
nice specs but... the look
__________________
There's times in life where I want a relationship, but then I cum.
Quote:
[23-08, 13:17] nabs i've gripped ice boy's shaft before
Quote:
[26-08, 13:50] Jesusjuice is this a sports car forum? why are there so many hondas?
bloodmack is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-11-2011, 03:24 PM   #9
manage the cap you say????
 
Not really racist!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,183
Thanked 3,613 Times in 1,181 Posts
I think its just the angle on the first pic, anybody have a better shot of the rear? The door + window look pretty mehhh too
__________________

\\ ______
  \(ಠ益ಠ)
   >  ヽ
   /   へ\
   /  / \\
   レ ノ   ヽ_つ ayyy lmao
  / /
  / /|
 ( (ヽ
 | |、\
 | 丿 \ ⌒)
 | |  ) /
`ノ )  Lノ
Not really racist! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:34 PM   #10
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 129
Thanked 27 Times in 12 Posts
the ass looks like shit
CKLCKL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:35 PM   #11
mpr
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
mpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 550
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
I like. cool little car for the kids to play with.

2600lb car with manley piston and h beam rod + gt3076r upgrade = nice sleeper
__________________
M157 LSA N55 4B11 VR38DETT 2ZZ-GE B18C5 DIG-T V10
mpr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:36 PM   #12
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
imo, crz looks better. combine the looks of the crz+specs of this car = epic win
rawr is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-11-2011, 04:01 PM   #13
Banned By Establishment
 
Shun Izaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2
Thanked 266 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rawr View Post
imo, crz looks better. combine the looks of the crz+specs of this car = epic win
this.
Shun Izaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:22 PM   #14
My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
 
Culverin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
^
that.

front's not bad. Bad looking tail isn't just angles, it's bad from every angle.
__________________
***Sarlo's Awesome Eatery ***
Facebook // Instagram
Culverin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:28 PM   #15
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
EmperorIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: home
Posts: 2,827
Thanked 3,842 Times in 879 Posts
looks liek a squished toyota FT86
EmperorIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 06:44 PM   #16
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 220
Thanked 64 Times in 32 Posts
Looks great but very often production cars look almost nothing like the concept model.
cheapskate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 06:57 PM   #17
straight from the fields of squamton
 
1990TSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 11,286
Thanked 576 Times in 201 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheapskate View Post
Looks great but very often production cars look almost nothing like the concept model.


so show us the concept of this! I've seen it. i'm doubting you have, even though you just mentioned it.


and inb4 mugen_gheyvolutions "honda is best"
__________________
2013 Mazdaspeed 3
1990TSI is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-11-2011, 07:02 PM   #18
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
GabAlmighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 5,324
Thanked 3,782 Times in 1,242 Posts
Needs more turbo diesel.
__________________
'16 Ram 1500
GabAlmighty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 07:29 PM   #19
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
optiblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,191
Thanked 274 Times in 135 Posts
Frack, hyundai's squiggly "H" emblem has more fire than Honda's straight arrow edge H. I hate to say this, but aside from S2K, Type-R, or the NSX, I think I would choose Hyundai over current Honda models.
Posted via RS Mobile
optiblue is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 01-11-2011, 07:34 PM   #20
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,131
Thanked 801 Times in 132 Posts
too heavy.
typ. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 07:41 PM   #21
Banned By Establishment
 
Shun Izaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2
Thanked 266 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by optiblue View Post
Frack, hyundai's squiggly "H" emblem has more fire than Honda's straight arrow edge H. I hate to say this, but aside from S2K, Type-R, or the NSX, I think I would choose Hyundai over current Honda models.
Posted via RS Mobile
lol... okay there...

spend $10k on a car, and see how long it'll last

edit: does anyone else see windows xp? /nerd
Shun Izaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 09:39 PM   #22
I don't get it
 
Eros250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: victoria
Posts: 437
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
another blow to japanese cars ughh... dammit honda step up your game.
__________________
PWP DC5
K6 gsxr750
WDP TL Type-S
VBP EP3 *sold*
Eros250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 01:42 AM   #23
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 220
Thanked 64 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1990TSI View Post
so show us the concept of this! I've seen it. i'm doubting you have, even though you just mentioned it.


and inb4 mugen_gheyvolutions "honda is best"
What? the pictures above is the concept model is it not? Are you saying you've seen the production model of this car?
cheapskate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 08:10 AM   #24
#savethemanuals
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
But that concept isn't too outrageous either so we can expect the production model to look mostly like that.

It might lose the gimmicky bits like the passenger door or the faux diffuser but that should be close to the real thing. And it looks ok. Not as good as a CR-Z but it should perform way better.
Energy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 09:47 AM   #25
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,966
Thanked 2,457 Times in 1,125 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eros250 View Post
another blow to japanese cars ughh... dammit honda step up your game.
Sadly, there's no need for Honda to step up their game. Honda has been living off of their reputation that they built in the 1980s. The Civic still sells like hotcakes and the Accord isn't a sales slouch either. Even if Honda decides to make a somewhat sporty car, they will lose out to luxury brands such as BMW, Audi and Mercedes which have made their cars more "affordable" in the last 10 years with aggressive leasing programs. I see more late model 3-series coupes on the road than RSXs. Heck, I even see more Z4s than S2000s.
Tapioca is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net