![]() |
Quote:
|
Interesting timing... I am actually in the process of an LS1 swap (which will grow into a lightly built LS6 once I blow up the "donor" motor) in my E36 3 series. My car in the "Before" stage... http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._4297419_n.jpg http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._3804077_n.jpg New-to-me LS1 motor: http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._7126455_n.jpg Some info I posted on the UBC Sports Car Club forum regarding the swap into an E36: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So the ultimate driving machine isn't designed for that... then what is? |
Quote:
An M3 is the ultimate street car. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
B5 2.7T:thumbsup: |
Is this M3 orange? |
I'm fully onboard the LSxV8 powered bandwagon. Everyone I know who's done the swap into a Porsche or BMW, raves about it. They all say they wish they had done it sooner. I've got enough seat time in vettes to know that the engine in stock form is glorious for racing. Parts are comparatively affordable, and the whole package is reliable. There are lots of kits for various cars, and there is a wealth of knowledge thats already out there. You can be a fanboy and root for a jdm engine swap or you can be an elitist snob and root for keeping the oem engine, but at the end of the day, neither are as cost effective and efficient as an LSx swap. You can be 'that guy' who tries to do something different and original, but it always winds up costing wayyy more, taking way longer, and being less reliable. |
Quote:
|
Nice Mark. didn't know there is another lsx swap locally. think this is the 5th car i know locally. great stuff. Quote:
|
Yeah I am really looking forward to it. I am at the point now where I have a solid base on the chassis, the car works really well, and it needed some power. My options were basically all the same price... Twinscrew + Excellent torque curve, 400rwhp potential, relatively easy to install - Major heat issues for track use, somewhat finicky S54 (E46 M3 motor) + Easy to install (comparatively), BMW motor (hey I am still a BMW lover) - Expensive to maintain, no real power options beyond approximately 315rwhp, relatively low torque levels LS1 (Camaro motor) + Easy to find, reliable, tons of upgrade potential, naturally aspirated - More complicated to install, not class legal for some classes I chose the LS1 because the ultimate power goal for the car is 400rwhp, 400rwtq and it must be accomplished either NA or with an SC. For autocross especially, but track use in general, I much prefer the linear power delivery of NA or SC, turbos are great but on a rwd car at higher power levels, they are simply much harder to deliver the same driveability with. The LS1 is a starting point, once it's in the car, from there any LS motor will just bolt right in in a matter of hours. Once I blow this motor up, I will buy a crate motor LS6 Z06 motor and with a few small bolt ons, I will have 400rwhp in a reliable, nearly stock package with a flat torque curve and a 7000rpm redline. What's not to like?!? -Mark |
Quote:
|
The only road race classes that are accessible to amateurs that I know of is SCCA's SPO class. NASA also offers an unlimited class I believe but I'm not sure what it is called. Personally, I am building my car for SCCA's "X-prepared" autocross class, CACC's GTO class for hillclimb, and the 2wd Open class for Pike's Peak. Finally, not sure why all the love for the LS7 in this thread... they are extremely expensive direct from GM and the displacement is not necessary to make that kind of power. A LS6 crate motor direct from GM for a racer is $3600usd. An LS7 is approximately $11500usd. Many classes base minimum weight off of displacement so a 7.0L is at a disadvantage for that. For example, my car is required to weigh 2390lbs with a 5.7L for XP which it will make, with a 7.0L it would be required to weigh 2650. For much less than $10k you can have a brand new crate engine from a reputable builder that will make more power than the LS7 with the original 5.7L displacement. -Mark |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Now that is a hell of a swap. But dollar per HP, not much beats the GM lsx series. They're powerful, light, and compact. But most of all, simple to run and cheap. Plus the aftermarket for the lsx is really strong. Quote:
The "old tech" comes from the materials used, and the finishing of the final product. After a million+ SBC's were produced, not too many were finished like a mass produced import motor. Still, this is what it's all about. \/ Quote:
:woot2: |
Quote:
|
hahaha, that's the classic mistake. You figure it out when you shoot flame out of your carb. :lol I'm now tits deep in both a newer Subaru engine, and my classic 350 sbc. What frustrates me about the sbc is the fact that they didn't care much about engineering it. Once you get more into the high end SBC stuff, like serpentine systems and EFI, nicely done headers, etc then you get my attention. The SBC is built to be a cheap engine option, but man, once you start spending time on it, you can really make an SBC shine. I love how Ford's new coyote series looks though. So hawt, with so many valves! http://www.ontariostreetcar.com/wp-c..._Original3.jpg |
Mark.... I am dissapoint :( |
Dont be. I am forever a BMW enthusiast, if I wasnt, I would have simply sold the car and bought a Corvette or a tube frame car or any of a million other cheaper, faster, options. My daily is a BMW, my racecar is a BMW, the cars on my walls are BMWs. In fact, it is because I love my E36 so much that I am doing this project. What I love about my BMW is the way it FEELS when I drive, and I am not changing that. What I dont love about my BMW is 205rwhp. And I am changing that! -Mark |
I say just DO IT ...... ! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net