REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Why no Turbos in F1? (https://www.revscene.net/forums/642532-why-no-turbos-f1.html)

Vale46Rossi 04-12-2011 08:00 PM

Y no turbo in carerra 4s?

cococly 04-12-2011 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindBomber (Post 7387782)
600hp+ K20/24 engines are so well proven they can be built with daily driver reliability using off the shelf parts, and that's a Honda engine utilizing after-market engineering. .


Proof? :speechless:

Death2Theft 04-12-2011 09:29 PM

Cuz Aryton Senna dead so.

Death2Theft 04-12-2011 09:35 PM

He be blowing up your mind as usual with his retardedness.
Good luck getting 600hp for the average idiot thats gonna put regular in the tank once in awhile, let alone 94 octane.
Quote:

Originally Posted by cococly (Post 7387812)
Proof? :speechless:


Timpo 04-12-2011 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindBomber (Post 7387782)
At first that sounds a bit ridiculous, but if you seriously consider the idea there's really no reason to not produce 4 cylinder turbo super cars.

600hp+ K20/24 engines are so well proven they can be built with daily driver reliability using off the shelf parts, and that's a Honda engine utilizing after-market engineering. Now, inject the developments passed down from F1 into those engines and I see no reason why they could not compete with a V8,V10 or V12. Superficially they may not be as cool as a V10, but in terms of performance there are potential significant weight savings.

that's because 4cyl is typically for economical cars...Yaris, Civic, Echo, Tercel, etc...

whereas V10 or V12 have this cool factor...

MindBomber 04-13-2011 12:18 AM

Like I said Timpo, the benefit to a V10/12 is partially superficial, a turbo charged 4 cylinder can match the power output. Porsche used 4 cylinder engines with great success for years before moving to higher displacement engines, and now they're bringing the 4 cylinder back in the 2011 Boxster.


Quote:

Originally Posted by cococly (Post 7387812)
Proof? :speechless:

http://www.k20a.org/forum/showthread...ighlight=600hp
http://www.k20a.org/forum/showthread...ighlight=600hp
http://www.k20a.org/forum/showpost.p...&postcount=824

danizer 04-13-2011 02:04 PM

i believe the difference between a 4cyl and a v8 v10 v12 whatever producing the same output is where the power comes from...
time will tell guys so CTFO

Great68 04-13-2011 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindBomber (Post 7388230)
Like I said Timpo, the benefit to a V10/12 is partially superficial, a turbo charged 4 cylinder can match the power output. Porsche used 4 cylinder engines with great success for years before moving to higher displacement engines, and now they're bringing the 4 cylinder back in the 2011 Boxster.

Peak power output may be matched, but the power delivery characteristics of an N/A V8 vs a turbo 4 banger would be very different.

Plus *in my opinion* a 4 banger will NEVER sound as good as V8, V10, or V12.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net