melloman | 06-14-2011 10:40 AM | Did you guys bother reading the whole thing? Before commenting maybe read it.. Quote:
Ward's conditions were unusual. He wouldn't sign confidentiality agreements, which made government and defence companies uncooperative. In joint ventures, he insisted on keeping 51 per cent. 'If they'd wanted to buy it outright, they could have had it. But they always wanted a licence, and if they wanted that they had to sign an agreement that says they won't plagiarise or reverse engineer. If they don't sign that, they get a sample and then they reverse engineer and why would they bother to get a licence?' This was why NASA never signed up. It's why BAE didn't, or Boeing, or the dozens of other corporations and military establishments who got somewhere in negotiations but never to the end.
| He wanted 51% in joint ventures ONLY, companies could outright buy it from him but didn't. They only want a sample so they could reverse engineer it. Thus the agreement for no plagiarise or reverse engineering.
He might've been greedy to the aspects of outright selling it, but cmon, a product that could withstand anything thrown at it, who wouldn't ask a billion dollars for it. IMHO I think he might've been abit greedy, but I would hold out the same. I wouldn't just go and hand out licenses so people can re-create my shit.
If this product is 100% real, it could completely change the ballistics industry for good. |