Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
07-28-2011, 07:31 AM
|
#201 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by goo3 Some ppl disagree with this approach. That's fine, but keep in mind Canada and many other countries have been doing the same thing. When a recession hits, the money the govt is committed to paying stays the same, but tax revenues drop quickly, throwing balanced budgets out of whack. They are afraid (rightly or wrongly) that cutting back too fast will make the recession worse, and the less bad alternative is to be in a deficit short term and paying it back when times are less harsh. | Keep in mind every time Keynesian Economics has been used we've been able to inflate our way out of the debt it created.
Almost 5 years after the housing bubble first popped in the US and there's no sign of inflating our way out of this mess. In fact the US keeps dropping even after all the Keynesian spending. Even in Canada with our stronger economy and Keynesian stimulus spending we're not back to pre-recession unemployment levels, nor is the TSX.
Its not going to work this time, a different approach is needed.
|
| |
07-28-2011, 07:37 AM
|
#202 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
i hope that they do not come to a deal before the deadline
|
| |
07-28-2011, 07:38 AM
|
#203 | 2013, 2016, 2017 & 2018 NHL Fantasy RS1 Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,155
Thanked 1,324 Times in 617 Posts
Failed 66 Times in 38 Posts
|
^ Why?
|
| |
07-28-2011, 07:41 AM
|
#204 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
why should they keep pumping out money which they dont have and will never pay back just so that the rich can get richer and poor will become poorer while wiping out the middle class. all of these decisions right now each time they get thrown out its just more opportunity for the ridiculous wealthy to get more money in the markets. im just tired of it all really, i think its time for a big change
|
| |
07-28-2011, 07:53 AM
|
#205 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gdoh why should they keep pumping out money which they dont have and will never pay back just so that the rich can get richer and poor will become poorer while wiping out the middle class. all of these decisions right now each time they get thrown out its just more opportunity for the ridiculous wealthy to get more money in the markets. im just tired of it all really, i think its time for a big change | Plus if it crashes the markets, those of us positioned in cash will have a field day buying cheap again like in 2008.
|
| |
07-28-2011, 08:20 AM
|
#206 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 4,694
Thanked 239 Times in 94 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 10 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 Plus if it crashes the markets, those of us positioned in cash will have a field day buying cheap again like in 2008. | That's what I was I thinking too. I managed to buy a bunch of bank stocks super cheap during the last crash
|
| |
07-28-2011, 11:45 AM
|
#207 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
lol did i hear this right? they want to raise the debt by 900b and have tax cuts/spending/whatever of 900b over 10 years lol who comes up with these garbage plans
|
| |
07-28-2011, 12:28 PM
|
#208 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gdoh lol did i hear this right? they want to raise the debt by 900b and have tax cuts/spending/whatever of 900b over 10 years lol who comes up with these garbage plans | Reps who want to see something pass. I don't think the majority of the Reps will vote for this... yet there is the threat that those Reps who do vote for this, if it fails, may vote with the next Dem proposal which may have even fewer cuts.
Regardless this was absolutely expected, a deal will be reached, and it will be shitty.
|
| |
07-28-2011, 01:06 PM
|
#209 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,091
Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
|
Interestingly enough, if we assume that nothing happens in the US and nothing gets settled, it is most likely that the stock market will experience a sharp spike downwards. Those who have invested in the US and have counted on either dividends or stock values will end up right along shit creek. those who are already marginal (employed, paying bills, not facing any major financial crises) will be negatively impacted much less than someone a position like your own, Taylor.
This kind of posturing and arguing is a lot like cutting off one's nose to snub the face: They are just fucking themselves over even more. A CNN commentator said something that I think is really true as well. "Not paying for the things you've already purchased and have been using is not at all fiscal responsibility. If you want to claim to be fiscally responsible, you need to pay your bills while working on your budgeting issues."
All of that having been said, I am kind of amused at the level of vitriol on both sides of the argument here on RS for something that we are essentially on the sidelines of it. I'd almost think we were in Scotland watching a Football (Soccer) match. Seems like people are almost ready to come to blows.
|
| |
07-28-2011, 01:35 PM
|
#210 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme S This kind of posturing and arguing is a lot like cutting off one's nose to snub the face: They are just fucking themselves over even more. A CNN commentator said something that I think is really true as well. "Not paying for the things you've already purchased and have been using is not at all fiscal responsibility. If you want to claim to be fiscally responsible, you need to pay your bills while working on your budgeting issues." | All these metaphors are so very simplistic and inaccurate.
The US has not purchased anything, they have promised their citizens certain things which they can nolonger pay for. Thus a much better metaphor would be "contracts" not "purchases". All those contracts come with a clause that they can be changed at any time - and that time is now.
|
| |
07-29-2011, 07:46 AM
|
#211 | My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
|
Fan-freakin-tastic.
Apple's now got more cash than the US Government. BBC News - Apple holding more cash than USA |
| |
07-29-2011, 07:47 AM
|
#212 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Culverin | A bum in the DTES with a nickle has more cash than the US government.
|
| |
07-29-2011, 08:01 AM
|
#213 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,476
Thanked 522 Times in 263 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 40 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme S All of that having been said, I am kind of amused at the level of vitriol on both sides of the argument here on RS for something that we are essentially on the sidelines of it. I'd almost think we were in Scotland watching a Football (Soccer) match. Seems like people are almost ready to come to blows. | I think you're underestimating how integrated our economy is with the Americans. If they bottom out this WILL have a rather large impact on our own economy and day to day lives, especially here in Vancouver.
Frankly, as someone who deals with small business I need the American dollar to be stronger, both so US clients will come up to us but also for the thousands upon thousands of dollars we're losing here in our local businesses to cross boarder shopping at the moment. Further more, if we lose the tourist dollars (which are flagging already) from Americans coming up here that has a massive impact on the service sector, which is one of the largest employers in this province. These things create trickle down that eventually effect all areas of business in our province.
__________________
~ Just another noob looking for a clue
|
| |
07-29-2011, 08:09 AM
|
#214 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
yeap if the US fails it will be a lot worse than 08
|
| |
07-29-2011, 08:29 AM
|
#215 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,091
Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
|
I wouldn't say I'm underestimating it, but I hold no illusions on the amount of influence that us Canucks have on the Americans. The number of people who are holding arguments over the potential downfalls of the American economy while sitting here comfortably protected in our socialist environment with decent taxes and a decently strong banking system.
We're not perfect, but right now in the world it seems nobody is. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-29-2011, 10:23 AM
|
#216 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
|
There will be no default, yet there may be many Americans receiving IUOs.
Try this tool to see how you would spend the $172B/mn revenue on the $306B of programs the US runs. You'll notice debt repayment is only $29B and can easily be paid, its everything else that would suffer. There's easily $50B that could not be paid and most people would not notice the service cuts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...-paid/?hpid=z2 |
| |
07-29-2011, 10:26 AM
|
#217 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,771
Thanked 810 Times in 403 Posts
Failed 152 Times in 50 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Culverin | apple should buy the US!!
|
| |
07-29-2011, 03:40 PM
|
#218 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
| |
| |
07-29-2011, 03:44 PM
|
#219 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,091
Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by strykn | It's the double-jump debt limit bill; this'll fail in the senate easily. And if it doesn't, Obama's gonna veto it.
|
| |
07-29-2011, 06:03 PM
|
#220 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,217
Thanked 811 Times in 274 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 63 Posts
|
Senate voted it down, fucking us gov are like high school girls. So much fucking drama. They know they will have to negotiate & meet in the middle somewhere, why not just get it done! Idiots Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-29-2011, 07:14 PM
|
#221 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
thats politics for you
|
| |
07-29-2011, 09:04 PM
|
#222 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tool001 Senate voted it down, fucking us gov are like high school girls. So much fucking drama. They know they will have to negotiate & meet in the middle somewhere, why not just get it done! Idiots Posted via RS Mobile | I keep wondering how real the threat of a rating downgrade is, cause they want proof the debt can be cut, while the Dems keep negotiating for more debt with little plan to reduce it.
It would be really interesting if Obama signs something then they get downgraded cause it effectively did nothing to reduce the debt. Even what was just shot down only planned to reduce the debt by what was being added over 10 years, leaving them in just as bad a place 10 years from now.
The Dems want $2,4T more, and I hate to say this, I think the Reps should give it to them and then demand their $4T in cuts, which would be better than this $900B and $900B back loaded shit.
|
| |
07-29-2011, 11:13 PM
|
#223 | My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
|
What about corporate sponsorship? We already do it to stadiums, train stations and sometimes even streets.
Wouldn't this help to alleviate the debt just a bit? |
| |
07-31-2011, 04:44 PM
|
#224 | I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
|
they struck a deal |
| |
07-31-2011, 08:24 PM
|
#225 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,206
Thanked 188 Times in 83 Posts
Failed 148 Times in 32 Posts
|
what does that mean?
raise the debt ceiling and have another crisis in 6 months (back in their old ways) or they found a new solution?
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 AM. |