REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Vancouver cyclist sued by driver after collision (https://www.revscene.net/forums/664460-vancouver-cyclist-sued-driver-after-collision.html)

jack3d 03-12-2012 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soundy (Post 7826585)
Insurance pays if you drive your car into a tree, doesn't it? Pays if you burn down your house. In both cases, of course, provided you didn't do it on purpose. Same would apply to running your bike into a solid object.

I can see what you mean but where does the line get drawn? Is a 5 year old whos learning how to bike going to have to get his bike insured?

firebird79_00 03-12-2012 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DC5-S (Post 7826357)
^the car driver is suing the cyclist
Posted via RS Mobile

lol i didnt even read it just scanned the title quick. read it as vancouver cyclist sues driver. Guess it just seems like something a cyclist would do.

hongy 03-12-2012 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jack3d (Post 7826984)
I can see what you mean but where does the line get drawn? Is a 5 year old whos learning how to bike going to have to get his bike insured?

5 year shouldn't be out on busy roads though.

wstce92 03-12-2012 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jack3d (Post 7826984)
I can see what you mean but where does the line get drawn? Is a 5 year old whos learning how to bike going to have to get his bike insured?

Quote:

Originally Posted by hongy (Post 7827144)
5 year shouldn't be out on busy roads though.

^Bingo

If it's a kid farting around their block or at the park; or even adults farting around their block or park, then insurance or licensing shouldn't be required.
But if you're going to ride with CARS on busy city center roads, then we better be able to hold you accountable for when you don't follow the rules of the road or hit cars/people/things.

Ferra 03-12-2012 02:25 PM

What I am thinking as I am reading this thread:
"Man....this mindbomber guy must be some critical mass, cyclist nazi...failing all the anti-cyclist msg :fuckthatshit:"

The_AK 03-12-2012 02:45 PM

Another cyclist thread, hmm....











Mindbomber

http://www.bobkestrut.com/images/Int...on_hipster.jpg

GabAlmighty 03-12-2012 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hongy (Post 7827144)
5 year shouldn't be out on busy roads though.

Ok, what about a 12 year old? Or a 15year old? I can tell you I was rippin around town on my bike when I was 12-15 years old. Insuring bikes just doesn't make sense in the big picture, plain and simple.

Firmware 03-12-2012 03:07 PM

Cyclists fucked up downtown.

spyker 03-12-2012 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Firmware (Post 7827432)
Cyclists fucked up downtown.

The bike lanes fucked up downtown,there was always cyclists downtown for as long as I can remember.

Don't blame the cyclists,blame the mayor if you're looking for someone to point the finger at.

danizer 03-12-2012 03:22 PM

Quote:

The driver, Ruey-Ying Isabel Chen, is now accusing Meggs of being negligent and causing the accident.
this cant be good for generalizations that chinese people are cheap

spyker 03-12-2012 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danizer (Post 7827444)
this cant be good for generalizations that chinese people are cheap

It does not matter if the person is cheap,generous,rich,poor,black,yellow,white,brown, male or female,if my vehicle sustained $5000 in damage due to a nazi cyclist and ICBC would not cover the damages,I would sue too.

JSALES 03-13-2012 07:07 PM

FUCK YEAH!

Firmware 03-13-2012 07:08 PM

I blame both.

Over9K 03-13-2012 07:20 PM

Why can't they just stay on the sidewalk?

People are a lot easier to avoid then cars...

GabAlmighty 03-13-2012 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Over9K (Post 7828746)
Why can't they just stay on the sidewalk?

People are a lot easier to avoid then cars...

No, they're not.

Over9K 03-13-2012 07:38 PM

Yes they are..., people can just jump out of the way, or the biker can well easily swerve around them.

Making them go beside a 70 km/h car is the dumbest idea ever.

Death2Theft 03-13-2012 08:44 PM

While I agree it's the fact that people want the "right" to wander/walk around free as farts without a care in the world on a sidewalk. They want their kids to be able to run around like retards, old people to sleep walk and the average person to walk around with their eyes texting on their phone all while not being hit by cyclists!
Quote:

Originally Posted by Over9K (Post 7828778)
Yes they are..., people can just jump out of the way, or the biker can well easily swerve around them.

Making them go beside a 70 km/h car is the dumbest idea ever.


gars 03-13-2012 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Over9K (Post 7828778)
Yes they are..., people can just jump out of the way, or the biker can well easily swerve around them.

It's funny because Sidewalks are meant for people. People who are standing on a sidewalk waiting for the bus shouldn't have to look both ways to see if a bike is coming at them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Over9K (Post 7828778)
Making them go beside a 70 km/h car is the dumbest idea ever.

I'm sure a lot of people will agree that having bikes on the road with cars isn't the safest thing I'm sure.... so Vancouver installs bike lanes - and everybody complains..... hahaha.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net