![]() | |
Quote:
|
Quote:
same goes for your bathroom LUL |
That Brisbane house is also demonstrating dirt cheap land. To build that house in CAD you're looking at 750-900k at cost, at a minimum to build. |
Traum, I applaud you for your optimism and belief in the system and our politicians. One thing to note about listening to the demands of the general public; its the same general public that unanimously chose to vote out the largely economically favourable and beneficial HST to 'teach the government a lesson'. So my faith in what the general public wants and its reasons for wanting certain things are considerably lower than many |
Quote:
http://www.blacktomato.com/wp-conten...a-Brisbane.jpg |
Quote:
I am actually extremely cynical of the system and our politicians. Especially in BC, I hate Crusty and the current Liberals with a passion, and the NDP has been continually proving themselves to be largely ineffective to the point where they almost look invisible. I agree that the general public doesn't always end up doing / believing the "right thing" -- your HST example precisely proves the point. However, even with the HST debacle, I was glad to see that the margins were sufficiently close, and especially among the pro-HST camp, there was a lot of smart, well-informed, reasonable people pushing for their agenda in a logical, factual manner. In that sense, I know I can at least have more faith in the general public than the politicians. It may take some time to steer the masses towards the "proper" conclusion, but generally speaking, the masses will eventually figure it out. Getting back to the RE situation at hand, as gloomy as things are looking right now, I will at least say that there are some glimmers of hope on the horizon, with the most recent one being the Bank of Canada governor coming out with a Vancouver + Toronto home prices warning. Going further back, the banks are also realizing the risks involved in the Van-TO markets, and have either taken measures or issued warnings about them. With the banks joining the ranks to call for action, there would have to be some pressure applied on the politicians and levels of government to do more than just half measures. I just hope there is still enough time, that there would still be a chance for me to afford purchasing my own single detached home instead of simply inheriting my parents rundown bungalow, only to get property taxed to death to the point where I have to sell it. |
Quote:
in europe, people are buying negative rate bonds for the same reason people in vancouver are buying real estate - the expectation of continued capital appreciation. at some point, over a long period of time, we will have to normalize. this will hit living standards (because we will have to work for what we have rather than just buying it on credit) at some point the bond market will slowly implode. equity returns will be lower than they have been historically, in many markets real estate will implode. we don't have enough inflation in the developed world through demand, only through money supply - this is a massive problem. just stay diversified, equities, bonds, real estate, gold (in good allocations) - you can't lose with this as you will always buy low, sell high |
without 30% down from the parents. Your only chance of owning is waiting for your inheritance. China money, drug money, real estate industry will keep driving prices up. God help us all. |
Quote:
Now we're arguing that families should move into Whalley shitbox for $250k, and that's considered realistic? This is why I hate this city, we're a bunch of segregated selfish fucks who give a shit about each other. This city has no community, which is so clear why this situation has been able to happen, we're apathetic, we don't hold our government accountable because there is simply no community in this city. It's sad, really. This city has changed so much, and not for the better. |
Just learned that my neighbour's 30yrs old house was sold 1.7m in Quilchena area. It was only worth 600k 12 yrs ago! so unreal |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's just that we are stuck working 60 hours a week to afford to live here so it makes taking action so hard. |
there are communities as shown by several community centres in vancouver... when the gov't didn't have funds for them to do certain things decades ago they told the communities to group together, fund raise, etc to make it happen for themselves...and they did...and the communities came together to build good community centres/programs, etc. and still do. in the last few years Vision decided to swoop in and tried to take control with the one-pass and reallocation of funds, etc. fortunately those communities stuck up for themselves and their communities... funny how in the last election the majority of the vancouver parks board who were vision members were not re-elected...unfortunately we could not do the same to moonbeam. i'm glad those community centres tried to create awareness as to what was happening otherwise i wouldn't have known this was happening. i stumbled on to one of those events by accident a couple years back. Court stops Vancouver park board from evicting dissident community centre associations |
Quote:
While its clear things are overpriced, I'm curious what and where you guys think 250k should buy? 500k? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What would you do that would 1. Allow people who want to get in the market to get in and 2. Ensure that people who have bought recently don't go under and 3. Ensure that people nearing retirement who have been banking on the rising equity on their homes to fund their retirement? I'm personally all ears. Please, I'm waiting for someone to give me a reason to stop my apathy. |
Quote:
I'll give you a hint. Its 67000 in Vancouver A standard rule set by lenders is that your housing shouldn't cost more than 28% of your pre tax income. $1500 that leaves you for mortgage payments. That maxes you out at a 350k place, paying the maximum allowable lending amount set by a bank. Add in your $400 a month condo fees for your poorly managed 25 year old dilapidated building and you are spending 50% of your POST-tax income on just your condo. That leaves you about 2100 a month for transportation, food, entertainment, clothing, MSP, insurance, phone, tv and internet. But those other things are just entitlement. Why should an average earning person get all those luxuries? Feel like furthering your education? Why should you feel like you deserve such a luxury?! Get injured or sick and can't work? Too fucking bad, work harder you entitled millennial! You should have saved more money for an emergency even though its completely not possible! It blows my mind how people don't even care about the world (or our city) being a better place for average individuals. Again, I'm doing just fine. I'm not some pissed off kid thats mad because he can't get into the game. I'm mad because the game isn't fair for those that didn't have something handed to them. I'm also mad because people that got lucky feel like those that didn't "just need to work harder and quit complaining." |
^if the average income is $67,000 in Vancouver, and you can't afford a home at a reasonable price of 300-400k now, then please just leave this city because you will never be able to afford a place here, bubble or no bubble, period. People seem to be bitching left and right about this housing market. Yes it sucks. Yes you deserve to raise a family in a house in Vancouver. Yes you work hard and yes it's not fair. But life isn't fair. if you're going to bitch about something, do something about it (not directed to you). Move somewhere else. Raise a family in a 1 bedroom 450 soft condo, do whatever it takes |
Quote:
Are you saying that its a reasonable salary to afford a 400k home? Because as I just explained.....its not. |
Then don't buy a 300k-400k home? Buy something even cheaper. Bet I can find something out there. Won't be glamorous but it's a roof over my head. But people want new, stainless steel, shit from crate and barrel, swimming pool, strata fee to less than $200 with concierge, big screen tv, $150 phone plans, etc etc All I'm saying is, live within your means. If your household salary is 67k, you should probably rethink what you're doing as a career if you plan to live a semi luxurious life Edit: ways to save money. Don't drive. Cancel your data plan, eat out less, stop drinking your crackbucks every morning, cut down on alcoholic beverages and eating out, cut your Telus tv/internet plan etc |
Quote:
I did a MLS search for houses (okay, let's be serious... apartments) in Langley that were between the $200 and 300,000 mark. Each and every one of them were located in a part of town that, frankly, isn't suitable for family living. For an outsider I know they wouldn't know the difference, but for someone who lived there for the better part of 32 years (and still goes back every few weeks), I would never willingly spend that amount of cash to live within a specific set of city blocks. Quote:
Quote:
|
@lomac I did a super quick MLS search for Richmond and tonnes of properties show up and ridiculously low prices (150k - 200k) they're ugly, but a roof is a roof. And $67k USED to be sufficient. Gotta get with the times. I don't have a family because I'm not ready for it. I'll start one when I'm financially ready. If you're not, don't start a family. If it happens, congrats but start living a different life than you are now. Sacrifices need to be made. My dad emigrated here in the 70's with the cloths on his back, wife and 2 kids. He put a roof on our head and food on the table. He made things work. We also lived in less than 450 sqft. He and my mom both worked 2 - 3 jobs and sacrificed everything for us. If you can't make it work, then you're not trying hard enough. Edit: I understand everyone's frustrations and concerns about the housing market. I'm not trying to play devils advocate and say "too bad so sad", but bitxhing is not going to change a thing. Well, it might and the bubble might burst, but then people will end up bitching about something else, like why they aren't getting paid xx amount for doing there job, minimum wage, probably the housing market and what's available. The bitxhing won't stop |
Quote:
Today, a $67k income qualifies you to borrow about $300k given interest rates just over 2%; the average Vancouver detached home sells for $1.8M. 10 years ago, interest rates were about 6% and a $67k income qualified you for a $200k mortgage while the average detached home sold for $900K. Housing prices have gone absolutely insane, but my point is simply that if your household only earns $67k, you have not been in any contention to buy a house in Vancouver for many decades, let alone "higher end homes". There has been a disconnect between earnings and house pricing for many years in prime areas of Vancouver, it's just that this recent explosion has pushed it out to all the suburbs as well. Mark Sources: http://www.ratehub.ca/prime-mortgage-rate-history http://www.news1130.com/wp-content/b...2/02/rebgv.jpg |
Quote:
This sums things up pretty well, those who bought in at the right time and are enjoying all the inflated money their house has gained don't want the good times to end, so they tell everyone else to suck it up and deal with it because this is the new normal. So pretty much "don't fuck this up for me just accept that Whalley is good enough for you, if you want stainless steel work harder". Let's not try and find out why housing is rising at an insanely unreasonable rate, let's just say that your wage that would normally afford much more is only good enough for a piece of shit apartment. "Hey my daddy worked 20 hours a day and wasn't present in my life so neither should you for your kid suck it up buttercup." |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net