![]() | |
The cheapest people I've ever known have also been some of the richest people I've ever known. Think they don't care about 15%? Yes that money is nothing to them but to think they don't care, you're so wrong. |
Quote:
|
So paying an extra 15% tax is not ok but paying a few hundred thousand to $1mil over asking price is? (Yes, not all transactions but the willingness to do it means something) |
Quote:
For the people living here who have to borrow money from the bank, the 15% tax may affect their decisions. For the people not in Vancouver, then that 15% only means they need to compare total cost vs say buying in Toronto who doesn't have the tax. But if the Cdn dollar drops some more, then they gain more buying power making that 15% tax look less when comparing houses in other countries. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they are responsible for the luxury market, do they drop down to a lesser property because of the tax? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The main point is I think a lot of people regardless for their reasons will buy it will care about the 15% to a degree and that tax alone will be enough to deter some, some others will just choose to either suck it up and pay it anyways, or just not care at all. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
^^ I'm not disagreeing with you about the average worker spending money here and the investor just leaving a vacant home here hurts the economy but I'm just telling it how I see it. Lots of money is just not parked here. Don't they send there wife and kids over here to live anyways? Like my previous point, if they willing to spend $500k over asking.. I'm sure they'll make it work with the 15% tax If everyone's waiting to buy in when the bubble bursts, what makes you think people won't wait it out when it's time to sell for the prices to jump up to 2016 prices again if it does fall? Yes, the people who are stuck signed to ridiculous mortgages that they can no longer afford it may have to let it go for possibly cheaper, but many people who own property in Vancouver aren't new buyers, but people who have owned since god knows when. This could also be a problem if no one is willing to let go of there properties if the prices went back down to 3 years ago |
To say that 15% tax has no effect is very optimistic IMHO. It all comes down to math. A 2M dollar home now costs 2.3M to foreign buyers, while its value in local buyers is still 2M. The first 2 question to ask is "will the foreign buyer be able to recoup that 15% PLUS a reasonable profit when he/she decides to sell?" and "will this money be better invested elsewhere?" The first question comes down to the time foreign buyer decides to keep this investment. The 15% tax basically make it impossible for quick deals (buy, hold for 6months, sell for x% profit, rinse and repeat) as it would take a while for the property to go up by 15%+. So the investor has to factor in the risks and cashflow problems during this period. Second question kinda reverts back to the first question. If by investing elsewhere, investor can get a similar return, but waiting for less time (hence less risk), then why not? If the return is less elsewhere, then would the additional risk be worthwhile for Vancouver? When you solve these questions, it's not hard to see the effect of this tax because remember, in the scenario I mentioned takes no assumption of market condition (or actually the assumption that the market would continue to grow) and everything else except the tax would stay constant. Sure some super rich Chinese could have a different expectation and continue to buy, but the tax would act as a barrier preventing those with less affordabilities to enter the market. How much of those people account for the entire market is what we would find out later. |
If I was a foreign investor I would just go straight to the USA now. Canada was attractive due to easy immigration relative to the US. Now immigration is harder with a a foreigner tax negating the stronger USD. Mainland Chinese people love SF Bay area and the San Gabriel Valley near LA. "But Vancouver is closer to China, has better Chinese food and you don't need to learn English!" Which is true but is it worth 15%? |
allow me to sum up this thread :lol https://i.redd.it/o1f18trk0bdx.jpg :lawl: ... ... :okay: FeelsBadMan |
Quote:
I am one of them, I can forsee in the next decades, many of us will move right back /rant FailFish |
Here is the thing none of you guys have focused on. If it doesn't cool the market, fine. Your government gets to take billions in tax dollars to fund public services, reduce income taxes, and fund infrastructure. It is a win win situation for most people in BC. You are forcing these housing flippers to pay taxes for income they would never report in the first place and if they stay and abuse welfare etc, then at least the blow is softened by this tax. Look at the Hong Kong market for example. Non resident tax, non first property tax allowed the Hong Kong government to have one of the biggest fiscal reserves in the world for a population of 7 million (how they decided to spend it is another thing). As a result, my income tax is effectively around 10% with zero capital gains tax. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You seem to think that income tax reductions is outrageous. Short memory? That happened December 2015. Unless you are like the rest of RS and make over 200k a year..... |
was being cheeky not outrageous but i just don't expect anything from the gov't...if/when it happens then it's a pleasant surprise and that's great...guess i'm cynical... i have a terrible memory, but do remember lots of useless trivia information i wish i made over 200k like the rest of RS...i'm just an east van 200k-in-aire |
|
Hondaracer, was it you that said you're selling your place next month? Are you planning to price it for a bidding war or for what you actually want for it? Has this tax concerned you at all? |
Honestly I've got no idea how it's gonna go. I'll provide the whole story of the sale and the house once it's gone The house is in east Van, Hastings sunrise but it's not a traditional Vancouver special lot, its smaller lot, but a bigger house, 2300 sq ft, 3 big bed rooms, 2 bath, built in 1912 lol The upside for us is that the price range this house is in is the same or slightly more than some of these newer duplexes are in. So yea, odds are we will be pricing it anticipating multiple offers. If we don't get what we think it's worth, odds are we probably won't sell, I'd rather keep it I think. We ain't balling like that really however, we came into this house due to unfortunate circumstances so it's kind of mixed feelings as to what to do with it Oh, and regarding the tax, my only concern is the trickle down effect of prices, this house, albeit very old and having its fair share of warts, is more than likely a local family is going to buy to live there, not tear down or have sit vacant. |
your home that sounds like a perfect home for a local with a relative in contracting that can help fix it up, or a local guy that'll rip it to the studs and do it up new while keeping the heritage style shape of the home intact and resell. |
Basically. The structure is good even though it's 100+ years old and the main issues with old homes such as roof, foundation drainage, Windows, siding/envelope have already been addressed. If I had a month in it myself I could probably get another 100k out of it, but it's a toss up whether or not lip stick Reno stuff would increase the value as somone buying will probably want to do things themselves. |
Not sure if 500sqft is worth $1350 rent in New West. It's the newest building there (Trapp + Holbrook) What do you guys think? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 AM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net