I came out of Iron Man 3 relatively unimpressed... :/

^
That sucks, but was it better then the second one?
Posted via RS Mobile

It was better then the second one for sure..

lots of one-liners that were pretty good..

I enjoyed it.

I would say slightly better, but the comedy got a little out of hand sometimes. And it felt more like Lethal Iron 3: Diehard Batteries rather than Iron Man. The one-liners were good, but it didn't quite have the superhero Marvel feel, if you know what I mean.

I look forward to seeing it in theatres.....in a month or two. Can't stand packed theatres

i actually enjoyed it! a lot of people might not like this movie because of how they potrayed you know who, but heck it threw me off guard.

I was impressed by it! Didn't really enjoy the first 20-40 minutes of it though, but other than that I thought it was a lot better than the 2nd one and just slightly under the original!

P.S.
If you see anyone wearing a blue Internet Explorer shirt holding one of those windows tablets, approach him/her! (or let him/her approach you). For 2 minutes of your time, you'll get a free movie ticket! Me and 2 of my buddies each scored one last night before we entered the cinema for Iron Man 3 :)

It was average for me. Where were the Avengers during the whole movie?

I thoroughly enjoyed it. Did anyone else notice the throwaway lines and little things for the nitpicky fans?

http://tromoticons.files.wordpress.c...5&h=269&crop=1

I think best Marvel movie yet.




Also
http://24.media.tumblr.com/4422df82a...wpwo5_1280.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/b7e419bc5...wpwo2_1280.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/785583fc5...wpwo4_1280.jpg
Source:
http://graphitation.tumblr.com/post/39670635080

9/10 Movie.

It's different. Focuses more on Tony Stark than the suit itself. Refreshing and different, really nice addition to the trilogy.

Ben Kingsley, the man is a freaking genius.

IMDb: Iron Man 3 Videos - a list by IMDb Editors

I expected a different movie... Good entertainment value but terrible movie for the comic book nerd inside me.



Major plot spoiler.

Some concepts for the end credits of IronMan3

Pretty rad, especially this one below with the 70s feel

http://www.artofthetitle.com/title/iron-man-3/

pretty weak..
best scene was the airplane scene
and they really emphasized on the opening and closing of the armors...i think they opened like 30x in the movie?

the trailer looked so promising, definitely left the theatre feeling the opposite

Wow. I hated this movie.
Posted via RS Mobile

A comment posted on IGN with some good pointers

The biggest problem for me wasn't even the Mandarin. There were so many other just plain stupid things in that movie.
1. He clearly has a whole Iron army below him but decides to use the PoS Mark 42 and almost dies in the helicopter attack.
2. Why does the extremis make Pepper master Shinobie?
3. Why would the Mark 42 run out of power when it is POWERED BY HIS CHEST REACTOR!!!
4. Why didn't he remove the arc reactor in the second movie when it was KILLING him?
5. It was Christmas time -_-
6. Iron Patriot did nothing the whole movie
7. Gods and Aliens yet Tony somehow manages to create 42 pieces of crap
8. He slides 20 feet on METAL GRATING during his Guy Pierce fight
9. So these Ex US Military heroes are now evil because?.....
10. Rhodey couldn't get the Patriot to work but 20 seconds later someone else flys of in it? hmmmmmm
11. He was handicapped the whole entire movie.

This is a spoiler worthy post btw. Not like you should come into a thread when the movie is already out anyways.

Movie had its ups and downs. I particularly disliked how killian died.... was so dull......

12. guy pearce breathes fire

this movie was a piece of shit. the first iron man film is the ONLY iron man film. these 2 sequals are just shitty spin offs. this is also more related to iron man 2, but i still cant get over the fact they replaced terrence howard with don cheadle. imo, terrence howard was to james rhodes as RDJ is to tony stark.

also

Please read the source material before commenting.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-s4mCKx1vgC...mallen+guy.png


I don't mean to be a dick about it, but if you going to throw around claims about how the Marvel Universe works, perhaps you should do a bit of background studying first.


The Marvel gurus seem to know what they are doing. The Marvel Universe is going to be like DBZ pretty soon, power levels won't mean a damn thing.
The heroes' powers are going to keep growing, exponentially so.
If you think Thor is god-like now, wait until Disney can wrestle back the X-Men/Mutant rights back from Fox. Consider Omega-level mutants.


If you're complaining about breathing fire, how will you cope with Rachel Summers, Franklin Richards, Apocalypse and Nate Grey?
:rukidding:


If you are complaining about breathing fire in a super hero movie, then you're missing the big picture.
There are obviously plot holes, but consider the wit, pacing and action vs the negatives. I would argue the pros greatly outweigh the cons.

1: It's a toy. He's playing with his most recent one (it's a beta) because that's what he's working on now. His armours are down below and since 42 is the only one that can be remotely controlled (or assembled) he's just sort of...got it nearby.
2: Extremis (original source) enhances you and makes you the biggest, best, strongest that you can be. It's the new Super-Soldier serum that made the Cap.
3: It seems as though none of them are powered by his reactor anymore--they all had independent power sources, enough so that they were able to be remotely controlled and fight without Tony being in them.
4: IIRC because the shrapnel (at the time) couldn't be removed and so the magnet was an absolute necessity for him not to die. Extremis helped him heal better/faster so that he wouldn't die as they pulled it out.
5: So you don't complain about movies set in the summer during December, but you complain about movies set in December in May? My guess is that the movie was originally set for a holiday release but got pushed back (Hobbit?)
6: He works for the government, he's a soldier. Army guys do what they're told.
7: Pieces of crap relative to superhuman nightmares that have never been seen before.
8: Come back and talk to me after you've watched any Die Hard movie. It's called "Suspension of disbelief"
9: Because they were thrown to the wayside and essentially told "we can't use you any more because you're wounded" (it's a real thing for a lot of soldiers) and are now incredibly grateful to the man/organization that has given them a purpose and reason to live again. Oh, and also their bodies even better than at their peak.
10: That was a bit messed up. My thoughts: the original suit that was stolen was not tuned to Tony. Rhodey "borrowed" it and then it started to get used by the gov't. AIM upgrades added some software allowing overrides (ie: remote flying to kidnap the president). The only part that made no sense to me is how Rhodes got the suit working again when the prez was strung up. How could he not have done that when they were trying to unseal the suit?
11: Where's the fun in a movie where there's no struggle?