![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Naw, just felt like using the same lines on someone other than Sebbery for once. |
My experience in the VT system is, at best, the money involved is "revenue neutral" or even a loss. If you take everything involved...including the cost of the Cop, car,equipment,training, operational expenses repairs, fuel etc), the cost of the ticket processing units at ICBC, their expenses, equipment, rent, wages, benifits....the cost of the court system, front counter staff & their expenses, the courtroom running costs, the JP and court officer saleries, benifits etc...you see where I'm going? The $138 for your basic speeding VT or even $483 for an excessive speed, hardly pays the bills. Just because you take in money at the front end does not mean you end up with 100% "profit" at the end of the day. If you had a system where the VTs were issued at no expense at all and paid without dispute, then you could say they had a money grab. There is no way that could happen. |
Hey zulu, next time you have a quota to fill, I got about a dozen real good fishing holes for ya, all within 5 minutes of home - places where dozens if not hundreds of drivers do stupid, selfish, and/or assholish shit on a daily basis, that I would LOVE to see cops set up to reel them in. Oddly, I almost never see cops in these locations, which leads me to believe that it really isn't about the money... imagine that. |
The thing that gets me, Is what about those systems in the states (Still applies in a sense) where you can pay a double fine to avoid points. How ISN'T that a money grab? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let's say the violation ticket system is completely gone today. Suddenly JPs, court officers, workers, ICBC and Police employees, etc have no tax payers to pay their wages. They're going to lose their job or get less hours. I might be completely wrong but if you look at how money circulates in our society, it will be better to have more tickets issued than less. Because in your theory, more tickets issued = more loss for government. ICBC | Second phase of life-saving intersection cameras rolled out ICBC says "All ticket revenue goes to B.C. municipalities" whatever that means? |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In this case, money is solving the problem. This is showing money can beat the law. Same things goes for bailout money. The more money you have, more things you get away with it. The law is controlled by human, not god. They're politicians, business executives, whatever you wanna call them. They do in fact, get attracted to money. Sadly. If you truly think it is NOT a money grab, then they should NOT even give out this option to "buy" the points. |
Quote:
Americans just happen to be open minded and not hiding it and be straight up about it. |
You'll remember that I said all fines to go the 'general revenue' pool. Many municipalities pay for their own policing services without subsidies from the Province and what have you. So that means that in Burnaby, where the RCMP are here and are subsidized by the province, our speeding ticket revenues will go to places like Nanaimo that pay everything. The money that is collected from the tickets has to go somewhere, right? Also. People have been saying that these things are cash grabs and different ways to get cash and all that. Let's think. What's the purpose of these tickets? To provide punishment for those who have failed to obey the law (and get caught--not everyone will get caught, obviously). Now when it comes to punishing people who have broken the law, what options do we have? Generally speaking, we have three options: -Fines -Community service -Jail Now I'm fairly certain that people think jail is an inappropriate punishment for MVA offences. Community service is annoying and frustrating--some people would probably prefer community service to fines, but just as many would rather pay money than lose 200 hours of their life. So what's left? Fines. And remember, it's not just about speed. Driving without due care. Driving while under the influence. Roadside suspensions. All of these things result in the same form of punishment. People who get caught speeding use all kinds of justifications: "Everyone was" "that's the speed people normally drive at" "he was picking on me" "I didn't notice" "I didn't know the limit changed" And a quintrillion others. People complain that the fines are too high, or that they're unfair. And then for people who get caught with a DUI they get their cars taken away, and people claim that is unfair too. If you feel that fines are unfair, then maybe you should start thinking of the other forms of punishment that you could be hit with if the government stops issuing fines. Do you want to lose your car instead? Go to jail? No? Then be glad you don't live in Sweden where the traffic fines are relative to your income. |
Quote:
Do you have any idea how insanely fucking clogged up the courts are? Cases are taking months if not years to come to trial - the trial over the Queen of the North sinking just started a week ago, nearly SIX YEARS after the sinking. My buddy disputed a red light ticket and just last week got his court date, *9 months* after he filed the dispute. Trust me, nobody's jobs would be lost if the need for VTs suddenly disappeared - people working in the justice system have job security for years to come. |
Quote:
I can say this because of my personal experience. Back in the day, I kept losing hours from work and my boss was being really anal about everything. You know, we all have hard time in our lifetime. I was driving everywhere because I worked at so many places at once. Because I could only get part time work. Sometimes I was late for work, stuck in traffic jam, I got speeding tickets...(yes i know its dumb) And shortly after I lost most of my hours due to my employers cost cutting and all. I disputed all the speeding tickets, because I could not afford them. I called officers who issued the tickets, went to the police stations, talked the JPs, etc... I tried explain them I am not trying to get away with what I have done, but the financial situation was terrible. I offered them community services and everything, I told them I am willing to do whatever. However, to make a long story short, violation tickets are "Motor Vehicle Act" and the only way of punishment is money. Plain and simple. They all told me that community services are for actual criminals. Not for tickets. I did feel unfair because the price of speeding ticket is not that expensive people who make 6 figure salary. (for example) And judges and officers make good money, so maybe few hundred bucks is nothing to freak out about, but at the end. The money was only solution. But the judge was being very nice about it and gave me price reduction + more time to pay though. But he said that's the best he could do for it and my offer for community service was rejected. Well it was a long time ago and I'm over it, but just so you know, unless you commit serious crime, DUI and kill people, etc, community services do not apply. |
Quote:
So what if money talks? What would you suggest be a proper form of punishment for traffic offences? Jail? ummmm yea, that will go well. A criminal record for someone who went 10 over the speed limit. No matter how you look at it, it will cost you money if you do something wrong. You fight the ticket, and go to court, you are losing money as time =money. You get your car towed, you PAY for it back. Everything comes down to money, so i don't see why you are crying about fines. Fines are just a DIRECT way collecting money. You may think rich people may get away with more as it is less of a hit, but if they have the mentality that "it's only 100 bucks", and keep violating traffic laws (or whatever laws), they are just going to keep paying 100+ bucks every time. Even for wealthy people, you would think that there would be a point where they will realize all the tickets are adding up.... and even if money isn't an issue, all the tickets they accumulate will possibly cost them a licence suspension. |
Quote:
So you are crying because you couldn't afford tickets you had..... how may tickets did you collect over the years? If you couldn't afford tickets, oh lets say, after the FIRST time, maybe you should have NOT broken any MVA's. Everyone who speeds does it knowing there's a risk even if they go 1km over the speed limit. So the fact that you couldn't afford to pay for tickets because of your situation, and kept doing so, makes me wonder WTF is wrong with you. btw. how old are you? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and i was not saying it was not fair, i was just saying that his point of community services option was wrong. |
Quote:
also if you were to value 'time' to 'money', well kids who work at McDonald's time will only worth minimum wage, whereas corporate executives time will worth $500+/hr. |
Quote:
Nobody likes fines, mostly because nobody likes punishments. But everyone knows that if you get caught, you get punished. Your circumstances resulted in a bad situation, and I'm not saying that what happened to you was fair. But the alternatives to fines for VTs are overly harsh in many (but not all) cases. Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't believe the argument that rich people get away with more if fines were just money, and that poor people would if it was community service. so, for the second time, how old are you |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For the safety of C-lais everywhere, just stay off the road. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net