Im thinking a bunch of bears held hands in a circle and used their inner combined spirts to shoot a beam of power and miracle-ly bring down the buildings if you will. A care bear stare.
If you dont get it by now, you wont anytime soon.

That was a brilliant and well constructed explanation. You have totally convinced me.

In related news, a nutball Truther vandalised a famous painting.
http://paturage.files.wordpress.com/...1180014306.jpg

Delacroix Liberty painting defaced in Louvre
BBC News - Delacroix Liberty painting defaced in Louvre

Then we can expect you to leave this thread and stop posting about these topics on RS? Since we don't get it, then there's no point in you continuing, is there?

He's said hes done with this thread three times now I think.

US government built the pyramids.

Well if the Illuminati is the US government...then yes. Yes they did.

At first I thought CharlesInCharge was just trolling, but with the time dedication involved on this individual's part, I'm heavily leaning towards the idea that he/she obviously has some sort of mental issue and needs serious help.

I do believe there's a lot of funky shit going on everywhere all the time, I'm not with you nor am I against what you're declaring about 9/11

But right now, these are discussed on forums on the internet, I can barely regard it as something to think deeper about. I'm sure there are people who have dedicated more time than you, to research all this shit you're brining up, but still they don't pursue it. Maybe it's not true? Maybe they know it's no use even mentioning it, because it won't make a difference going against whoever has been involved.

When you're able to speak out loud to the right people about all your theories, then I may give a fuck. But what are you trying to prove on REVSCENE?

Reflecting on the initial post, that guy is a bigger hero then hes credited for. He is still risking his life for the dead souls of 911.

When you look at PressTV and the Iranian government, it has truly become the president of the world conscience (its actually the current president of a 120 country alliance [NAM]).
And when you further mature and hopefully have lots of free time to discover the kinds of political humanitarians that are speaking out for justice from the United States (people like Mark Dankof and Ralph Shoeman[spellings off]) then you'll see why these conferences that Iran has and the kind of people that internationally travel there.. are trying to bring justice to the world and Im just a small carrier of that message.


Webster Griffin Tarpley


Famous director Oliver Stone's son was there last year for Hollywoodism
Hollywoodism 2nd International Conference held in Iran 2012 - YouTube
Some of the Hollywood discussion here is English.
1/2 Sean Stone after becoming Muslim - Part 1 - YouTube

Twice I asked you to comment on the subject of this thread, yet you keep ignoring it. I dont want to get in to wall to wall text discussions with you on all the spin the propaganda machine has instilled in you regarding the building collapse.

edited-

^ No, you're just afraid to discuss facts. Like all conspiracy nut jobs you'd rather put on a smoke & mirrors show instead of actually discussing evidence.

Then, as usual, you whine about how nobody gets it or that were all brainwashed. Rinse and repeat, that's all you do.

what facts, i'll discuss them with you

Okay, here's something.

The twin towers were one of the first skyscrapers to be built using the framed tube system. The structure's main supports are the shear walls. This allows a tall building to be very strong and can withstand high winds and even most earthquakes this side of a major one. It also allows space to be freed up inside to allow smaller and fewer support columns.

The inherent flaw with tubed frames, however, is that if you take out a chunk of the supporting wall, you've created a weak spot. If you build a house with this design in mind and want to put in a garage door, you need to install stronger girders to support the structural loss around that opening. The same principal works for skyscrapers. If you want bigger or more windows, you need more reinforcement. Most buildings are designed and built with a safety margin built in. Over engineering a building isn't uncommon.

However, what most people fail to calculate into their designs is a plane being flown into the side of a tower. Sure, the past is littered with various planes flying into different buildings. However, these have all been small planes (that B-25 that flew into the Empire State Building is the largest one, as far as I can recall), and even that can't compare to what happened at the WTC. An ultra-light or even a Gulfstream wouldn't do much to a large tower. However, a 767 is large and heavy enough, even though it's made out of lightweight material, to cause major structural damage. Imagine standing on an empty pop can. It can support your weight without a problem. However, introduce a weakness to that wall and it's only a matter of time before it fails. Keep in mind that the majority of the different floors support is also done by the tube frame.




But what the fires? They weren't anywhere near hot enough to melt steel!

Okay, that may be true. It's quite feasible the fires didn't burn hot enough to start melting the inner structural core. But the thing is that steel doesn't have to melt before it loses it's integrity.

How many of you weld? Hell, how many of you have used an acetylene or propane torch in order to get a stuck bolt off of your car? Or how about simply heating up a piece of steel long enough to bend a piece of flat bar into a corner piece? It doesn't take a lot of time or heat to do that.




Now... combine the fires weakening the steel's integrity, along with the fact that a tube frame has suddenly lost a huge portion of it's support, and the reason why the tower collapsed suddenly looks much more feasible.

:derp:

Come on now, that makes way too much sense to be plausible...Bombs and a random dude saying he saw some shit in the basement, read between the lines! Tupac isn't dead!!!

Exactly. People think of "red hot" or "white hot" when thinking about heating metals. But how hot is "red hot"? Basically, red hot is anywhere from 500-800C.

Metal Color by Temperature
Color Physics

And the best one - a 911 truther site utilizing the same chart as Process Associates.

911 Research Metal Color

These idiots often use this chart for color temperature to prove the "droplets" seen falling from the WTC could not have been aluminum and must have been steel being melted by thermite. Unfortunately these same charts also show that steel becomes soft and maleable at 800C, below the temperatures of a jet fuel fire.


CiC claims I'm going off topic. Well his first posting was about a "hero" hearing explosions in the basement of the WTC towers. Hence my questions about what brought them down are definitely on-topic. So I'll ask you the same questions again:

What caused the blast? Was it thermite? Explosives? What kind of explosives were they? What did the blast destroy (or disable) - that is, what was the purpose of the blast? Where in the building did the blast occur? What caused the WTC 1&2 to fall? Was it explosive charges? Thermite? Where in the building were they installed? How were they triggered? Wireless? Wired? Detonator cord (like most building demolitions)?

Hope they tear that lady a new one. Yes, great idea to scrawl your garbage on a priceless work of period art.

People that believe in conspiracies like this are just grasping at straws, searching for truth where there isn't any, fabricating justifications in their heads. They're just wackos that society shuns so they have to come up with reasons to reject society.

umm ok

I researched this a while ago and not willing to search for details again, but from what i remember it's explosives lol.. fuck i don't want to research again, yes that's not a good argument if any argument at all but whatever lol.

Then you should expect us to put as much energy into believing you as you have put in to convincing us.

Another brilliantly constructed argument by another conspiracy nut.

You guys are great at repeating the rhetoric you come across, but when people actually ask you questions, you have nothing.

Because there is nothing legitimate to back up what you say. Just a bunch of goofball conspiracies and whacky stories someone convinced you to believe.

So go ahead. Go search through all the consipracy sites you follow. I'm sure you'll find someone who is able to twist logic enough to the point where these questions can be answered to suit your beliefs. Then you can feel like you've "researched" and can support your side of this argument. Go on, we're waiting :ilied:

No skinny, some people can tell the truth because the more lies they're told the more they can see.. I really don't care if you live in illusion it's your choice to do so, and it would be unnatural for me keep convincing you otherwise if you choose to do so.

Yes i can research and put up a nice essay to convince you, but i don't feel a strong need to.. after all you're just going to ignore my evidence because you don't choose to believe it.

You can give all kinds of evidence but a person won't prove it to themselves just because they choose not to. If you don't believe it you're just going to try and find any type of possible explanation for it to not happen.



inb4 phaggot

inb4 conspiracy nut trying to support evidence

inb4 full retard

:suspicious:

In before yourself?

yes

How about my post, then?

it doesn't matter if the building collapsed from fire or not, then what about building 7?

There were no terrorists.. and there were so many signs before 9/11 showing what will happen, do you call that coincidence? Ok maybe one sign saying 9/11.. no there were many more

and what about the witnesses that died? just one died? no