![]() |
Quote:
Like I said in my last post though, not really sure what the UFO thing is yet. But I don't think people are just crazy. |
Quote:
|
can't wait till there's an invasion. |
Eh... Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
They need air: dive into a gas giant, alternatively electrolysis on ice (clean or dirty) to extract the hydrogen and oxygen They need water: dirty ice asteroid, most likely polluted with hydrogen (standard, deuterium, and tritium): fuel and water They need hydrogen (fuel, assuming hydrogen fusion): gas giant diving They need metals: asteroids in the E/M belt, or moons/moonlets/the belts of the gas giants. They need fabrication: construction in space is more efficient; vacuum welding, not needing structural integrity until the project is completed, easier access to materials They need gravity: centrifugal spin They need space: find an asteroid, bore it out, spin it. Repeat ad nauseum. Seriously. People who are into hard science fiction have so many reasons why the conspiracy theories on alien invasions are so very retardedly idiotic. |
Quote:
And what you listed is just one version of what may happen. If an alien species is sophisticated enough to master inter-stellar travel. You'd think they'd master the ability to rope in asteroids from our belt, and just hurl it at the earth, or just release some sort of nano-virus. They don't really need to even have 'boots on the ground' they can just rain hellfire from our orbit and we'd be helpless. |
Quote:
You also assume that they would want our planet. As you can see, the resources of our solar system as a whole (especially at our current level of development) are innumerably greater than the value of conquering a lameass little planet populated by monkeys. |
I think it's great to fantasize, but utterly ridiculous to assume anything about an alien species. |
If they've set foot on our planet (atmospherically), I highly doubt that they are here for an invasion. They are more likely here to observe, just like how wildlife officer's head up to the North Pole, to observe Polar Bears. They tranquilize then plant medical devices in them, gather biological specimens, then leave them there. The bears wake up and know that they've been messed around with, but don't have a clue of who they are. We are the Polar Bears. |
The truth is who we could be the actual Aliens on Earth except we don't know it yet :) |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Just because Canada is seen as USA's poor cousin (and the peacekeeping nation), it doesn't mean we don't have our own projects or joint projects hidden behind the scenes. |
Canada mainly specializes in surveillance it seems and we don't even have a clue about it thats the funny part. We just don't have to flex our muscles but when something goes down like a natural disaster look whos first 90% of the time.. |
much like we'll send robotic slaves to do our work and exploration, I assume aliens would do the same. |
Quote:
|
the same people who dont believe in a god because its "impossible" in their minds and there's no evidence of a god who laugh and diss those that do; totally find it believable that there are aliens even though there's no evidence its simply "possible" in their heads and get mad that they're doubted or made fun of :fulloffuck: :whistle: |
Found this interview last night, with the dude that put together the disclosure project (remember that old vid with all the military guys and people testifying?). I think they've got it right. Sirius Disclosure | The Sirius Documentary © 2013 ^ I haven't watched this new documentary yet, going to soon. |
^ I posted that up in the other UFO thread in the NSFW forum. It's good material. Here's my response to crafts being possibly secret aircraft projects, I've never doubted for one second that some of the objects are military. They could very well be highly technologically advanced crafts that can fly really fast (10,000 mph+), and be hidden from radar detection. To me, that's progressive advancement from current aerospace technology. This is a step or two above on what we have now. The aspect where I am skeptical are the 10% of the objects that don't meet "progressive advancement". Objects that defy the laws of physics, like how we understand physics currently on this planet. 1. An object that can materialize and de-materialize, at will. 2. An object that can travel in a single direction, performs a sudden 45 degree angle turn, and shoots towards the direction that it was travelling from at incredible speeds (speed doesn't gradually pick up). It's so fast that you can only see part of the tail. 3. An object that is travelling linear at a regulated speed, then all of a sudden within a blink of an eye, it goes hyper-speed (speed doesn't gradually pick up). It's out of your line of sight in a matter of a second. If this is what the military have then it's clear to me that they are not using a conventional propulsion system. If they are not using a conventional propulsion system then they are probably not burning fuel. If they are not burning fuel, then why are we? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net