![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
The downside (aside from missing out on upgrades and other perks) is that you feel obligated to fly that carrier, and legacy carriers (the only airlines that can offer you the global airline alliances) are often far more expensive, especially on the touristy "vacation" routes that I fly (US, Mexico, Europe in summer). After considering various FFP's, I decided it would be less expensive to just go for the cheapest flights, regardless of airline. That way I can always pick the most affordable airlines, regardless of destination, and not worry about feeling like I have to fly Air Canada even though they're 50% more expensive than other carriers. (I realize that you don't have fly your FFP carrier all the time if other airlines are way cheaper, but I've found that other carriers are almost always cheaper than legacy airlines on the routes I fly, meaning I'd never rack up many miles on the FFP and would regularly be paying a bit more money just to make use of the FFP). I'm 27 and I'm hardly swimming in cash, so the only way I can travel relatively frequently is by shopping smart and being cost-conscious when it comes to flights and hotels. If you fly for business, have money, or typically only fly to a few destinations (ie. annual trips to Hawaii and family visits to Toronto, etc) that are well-served by your carrier, then I completely agree that joining a FFP makes perfect sense. Quote:
(I realize that by doing this you run the risk of there being no overhead bin space, which is acceptable to me since I don't mind checking the bag if its free. But I'd usually take the risk anyway if the flight is 6+ hours long, as then seat choice becomes more important IMO.) I typically prefer to check my bag, unless I'm only traveling for a few days or have no connecting flights (rare when your home airport is small like YYJ is). If I have several connecting flights at busy airports, a fairly large bag, or lots of liquids and gels that the CSBA/TSA would confiscate (fuckers!), I'll cough up the fee anyway and just let the airline deal with the bag until I arrive at the final destination. Quote:
I don't really need validation, because it works for me much of the time and that's all I really care about (just posted it here to help out some fellow RS'ers). I definitely realize from your replies that the 'check your big carry-on luggage at the gate' strategy only applies if the airline has a fee for checked bags, and if you don't mind (or want) to deal with the bag during your flight(s). In other circumstances, or for those who never want to check a bag, it doesn't make sense. The "board last and get a great seat" strategy does work almost every time a flight is less than 100% full, so if you're not eligible for upgrades and aren't worried about overhead bin space, I still think it's a great way to find better seats. Example: A few summers back I flew on a Thomas Cook A340 from Frankfurt to YVR (with a stop in YYC)... as you can probably imagine, it was hell. 12+ hours with screaming babies, smelly people, and bare-bones amenities. The plane was completely full except for 3-5 seats, one of which was a single seat beside the staircase (cabin was all economy, and all bathrooms were downstairs in a cargo deck converted to bathrooms). I was able to lean up against the wall (staircase was on the other side of a divider) and sleep for most of the flight. It was the best seat on the plane IMO, as it combined the best of both an aisle and a window seat. Would never have gotten that seat if I had boarded on time, as my assigned seat was a window many rows back of the one I ended up with and it was only obvious since I was the last on board and all but a half dozen seats were taken. Doesn't always turn out as well as it did on that flight, but if the plane is less than 90% full there's usually a better seat available than the one you were assigned. The later you book and the worse your assigned seat, the bigger the payoff is for boarding last. Another thing I didn't mention: this strategy also allows you to investigate the people sitting around your assigned seat. If you see something that looks like a potential nightmare (child, fat person, huge foreign family, Justin Bieber, etc) you can escape that headache even if it means taking a 'worse' seat with more desirable looking seatmates. (Or, you could just sit next to the hottest-looking girl on the plane and hope she'll accept your bag of stale peanutes in exchange for hourly blowjobs?) Quote:
If it's coming out of your pocket, a single long-haul business class ticket could often buy you 5+ economy tickets on a low-cost or charter airline. As with most travelers, I'd prefer to save on flights and spend where it matters most (having a decent hotel, doing all the cool shit there is to do at your destination, having a rental car that I can destroy, buying a brick of cocaine, etc). So in hindsight, I should've added a caveat to my OP saying "this strategy only works if, like I do, you frequently travel to many different places on many different carries with a tight budget". :ilied: |
Another benefit to not being part of an FFP -- you get to take advantage of all this dude's deals, regardless of the airline offering them... YVR Deals | Cheap Flights & All Inclusive Vacations from Vancouver |
As to your point that not being a member of a FFP "allows" you to access those "great" deals... 3/4 of the deals on that page are StarAlliance and would allow you to accrue miles for an Air Canada / Aeroplan FFP. You seriously have the biggest superiority complex ever for a guy whose advice is pretty spotty on the accuracy and usefulness... |
lol brb, let me contact Aeroplan and tell them to relinquish all my Aeroplan points and Elite status. :fuckthatshit: |
FAA has no such regulation that forces a passenger to have his luggage on the plane he is on... That is just something that the OP made up. You realize that a lot of flights includes cargo that is being shipped around the country? It is not just baggage in the cargo hold... Again maybe 10 years ago it was, but not today with the cost of jet fuel where it is... |
Quote:
Not sure about the "superiority complex" comment, because I've already conceded that my advice won't work for everyone, and I am certainly open to other opinions and will certainly admit to being wrong if someone makes a good point. As I've stated a number of times in this thread, the "check your baggage at the gate" strategy really only applies if you wanted to check a bag but didn't want to pay the $25 fee. The "board the plane last to get a better seat" strategy, on the other hand, applies to anyone who isn't worried about overhead bin space... even if you've already been upgraded, you can still board last and find a better seat away from unwanted seatmates, away from the bathrooms, etc. To be honest I just posted my tips here in hopes that some RS'ers would find them useful... If you don't agree with it or don't think it will work in your situation, then don't use it... I really couldn't care less. But, I've done this succesfully 25+ times on many different airlines and routes, and it has never once backfired on me, hence the desire to share this strategy publicly with others. If you try it and it doesn't work for you, please report back and let me know why. Quote:
First of all, I'm fully aware that commercial aircraft carry mail and other cargo freight along with passengers. I've actually even mentioned that in another post in this thread. But it has nothing to do with checked passenger luggage, and freight falls under a whole different set of regulations. There is something called "Positive Passenger Bag Match" (PPBM) that is required on all international flights (in Europe and North America, anyway). It has been in place for many years, mainly in response to the Air India bombing. In a nutsell, PPBM means airlines and ground staff use software to match passenger lists (collected by the gate agents and verified by flight attendant head counts) with checked baggage manifests (collected by the ticket agent when you check your bag and the tag is scanned). If a passenger is not on a flight but his bag is in the cargo hold, the airline will remove the bag before they push back from the gate. The main reason for this is security (can't put a time-rigged bomb in a checked bag and then not board the plane) but it also ensures that airlines don't have to transport luggage back to the original departure airport if someone bails on a flight. PPBM is not mandatory on US domestic flights because all checked bags at US airports are screened so it's considered unnecessary. After 9/11 there was some proposed FAA regulation that tried to make it mandatory on US domestic flights as well, but it was shot down by airline lobby groups and the screening of checked bags made it redundant. I am not 100% sure on this, but I think some US carriers may have internal policies that require PPBM be used on domestic routes even though it's not government-mandated. Of course there are exceptions to this... such as if the bag is accidentally misplaced, improperly tagged, not scanned by baggage handlers, or if you miss the flight. But airlines do not intentionally put an international passenger's luggage on a different flight unless there's a legitimate reason, such as a lost bag or a mistake by ground crews. Generally speaking it's far more likely that your bags will arrive late (due to a screwup or lost bag) than early (which almost never happens on international routes). |
Quote:
Also sounds to me like not having enough time to load a bag onto a flight, or a full cargo hold sounds like reason enough to put the bag on the next flight... Especially considering I have had that happen to me on both a KLM flight and an Air Canada flight. (And these were both trans-continental flights). The reason this is perfectly acceptable is because PPBM only protects in one scenario. When you check a piece of baggage onto a flight, if you do not board that flight they will remove the baggage. It does not mean that the airlines must put you and the baggage on the same flight. (AKA the bolded part of all of the above, which you stated was an exception, is the only thing PPBM is actually intended to prevent against. So I stand behind exactly what I said, you just made that shit up, and called it a fact. Even though it had no bearing on what others pointed out. So how about you go learn what the fuck you are talking about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
a) exists; b) applies to all international and some domestic flights; and c) functions essentially in the same manner as I stated. The greatest piece of irony is that you say I "made up" this concept.... and then in your next post you proceed to use the technical term ("PPBM") to refer to this policy that apparently only exists in my imagination. I'll certainly concede that I was completely wrong in suggesting that it was mandated by the FAA, and I apologize for any confusion... (although I think this mistake on my part is somewhat understandable, given that the FAA is the body that sets US civil aviation policy, and given that a mandatory PPBM regulation was proposed to the FAA but then rejected because the TSA began screening all checked bags anyway). If you have insider info or knowledge that I don't... or if you see a mistake or inaccuracy in one of my posts... then by all means, please correct it for the benefit of myself and everyone else who reads the thread. But simply saying "you're wrong, you made that shit up" when I was simply unclear on the details is not helpful, productive, or informative. (I suppose this is RS, and I should know better than to expect every poster to add something to the discussion, but if you're going to troll and shit on threads, at least be amusing...) To address your point about luggage being left behind on international flights... yes, as I said previously, the PPBM policies are designed to prevent would-be terrorists from copying the Air India bombing by checking a timed bomb into a checked bag and then bailing on the flight. So, as I said, the only reason an airline will transport a bag without the owner on board the plane is if there's an unintended fuckup by the airline or the airport that was neither requested nor planned by the owner of the luggage. If the passenger doesn't know or want his bag to be left behind or put on the wrong flight, then obviously he doesn't have a bomb in it or is suicidal, neither of which are preventable through PPBM. Does this apply to my OP? No, not really. If I remember correctly, my post about PPBM was in response to a suggestion that you can lose your bags if you check them with the airline.... which is completely true and not something I'd ever argue against. It's a risk you take when you check a bag, but personally I prefer to check my bags when I fly... I just hate the fees associated with checked bags.... ...hence my "check it at the gate" strategy described in the OP. If you check your bag on the gate, there's no PPBM issues, and there's no chance of it being sent to the wrong place or being left behind (at least on this flight) since it is walked down the ramp and placed into your plane's cargo hold while you're walking down the jetramp. The short story is that checking your bag as you're boarding the plane (rather than at the ticket counter) reduces the chance of lost luggage, allows you to avoid the fee if there is one, and does not contradict the policy of PPBM. Quote:
What I meant by that was that I don't care if you (or anyone else for that matter) chooses not to use my 'board last' strategy. Like I said, everyone has different travel priorities, habits, and preferences... and clearly what I've said only applies to those who have the same travel philosophies as I do. So, yeah, I don't care if you take my advice or not... but I'll certainly reply to meaningful, thoughtful posts and with those who suggest something I've said is 'wrong' or 'bad advice' when they've either misinterpreted what I'm saying or my strategies simply don't apply because of their travel and airline preferences. In hindsight, I probably shouldn't have bothered making a thread knowing I would get sucked into an argument over semantics or a difference of opinion, but then again maybe someone will benefit from the tips in my OP and make it somewhat worthwhile. I'd like to say that I'll just go away now and not waste any more time on this thread, but really RS is like crack and I'm like Rob Ford, so I'm sure I'll continue to participate if anyone else replies with something meaningful.... |
Quote:
|
Man this is turning into FT lol. I also don't know half of the acronyms they use... So, long story short, do y'all know of a secret or tip on getting upgrades? Haha, I have a couple international flights in December on AC :fullofwin: |
op, by the looks of how much u know about flying,, i presume u fly alot? if so, u should already be gold status on both major alliance and automatically get upgraded??? |
Quote:
There will be plenty of AC*E35/50/75/100 and *G members ahead of you. Quote:
|
^ yeh but i want op to chime in as per his status.. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
but December on AC is pretty tough tho. |
Hmm, let me throw another question (I am a noob). I have a 4 hour layover in Vancouver prior to my flight to Korea, I have 1 checked luggage and no carry-ons. Am I allowed to step out of the airport for a bit? TBH Aeroplan kinda sucks for frequent flyer updgrades and stuff. Even at Elite 50/75k, you only get upgrade certs for Canadian flights and bonus %'s... Kind of wish they gave stuff for international. I end up getting vouchers for friends/family for MLL's... |
Last time I moved to a seat in an empty row, the stewardess told me to move to my assigned seat until take off is complete :fulloffuck: |
^That's because they need to seat count/cross check with passenger list .. Usually.. Quite rarely pilot will move people around.. That's how they found 3-4 people with fake tickets recently trying to get into Canada, they were already sitting on the plane Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Quote:
I don't know your flying pattern but you can try earning status with UA for those upgrade certs for international flights. or other *A carriers that offers better upgrade certs. Sorry I don't know which one is the best as I'm more of a OW guy than a *G, I just got status match over to *G recently. |
Quote:
MY POINT IS IT ISN'T AN FAA REGULATION. NOWHERE DID I SAY IT ISN'T A POLICY OF SOME AIRLINES, IT JUST ISN'T MANDATED BY THE FAA. YOU CLEARLY JUST MADE UP THE FACT THAT IT IS AN FAA REGULATION TO GIVE MORE POWER TO YOUR POST. Exactly as I stated in my first post when I came into this thread: Quote:
Also, you say that they will put your baggage on the flight if you check it at the gate, we are saying there is every possibility they say, fuck you, and decide against re-opening the cargo doors and put your baggage on the next flight. PPBM does not affect this scenario at all, I will re-iterate: the only time the terms of PPBM come into effect are when you check a piece of luggage and do not board the flight. They ABSOLUTELY must remove that piece of luggage before continuing along. It does not in any way shape or form prevent them from putting your luggage on any other flight to the same destination, regardless of whether it is that same day or 5 days from then. I am especially inclined to think any budget airline such as the ones you fly on, will probably say screw you and decide to toss your crap on the next flight. Why should they give a fuck, you didn't pay for the use of their capacity, and you held up their flight by being waiting to be the very last one on the flight. Just to get yourself a better seat that again you didn't pay them for. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
meme405 is a flight risk in addition to being a car bomb. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net