![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Kevin Barret speculates the U.S. remotely hijacked the plane because of radar workers going to China. 18:30 + minute mark _youtube.com/watch?v=B9XZV4vxjtU |
New update, looks like this is it. :tears: Quote:
|
Quote:
The debris looks the same because they're from satellite shots. If you have drones overhead, they can fly closer in without the risk of life. Plus, they can run overlap on search grids too. I'm not saying don't use people. I'm saying they could've existing technology to facilitate a faster search, and the only reason they're not is because of national security (drone capabilities, etc) |
Quote:
i do feel for them, having hope is the worst thing in times like this, as in reality, we all knew it was gone... the roller coaster ride these poor people went through, my heart goes out to them |
Quote:
Oh right, they have. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:pokerface: |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
|
Supposedly a MH technician told some reporter that the batteries on the pinger on all MH planes were not stored properly and were stored in high temp/high humidity which would decrease the battery life from 30 days to 15 days. He also said he had most of the batteries replaced in the aircraft's but the work was slow and doesn't know if the batteries were replaced on MH370. |
I would argue that the only bit of good news at this point is the fact that Australian authorities are now--to a certain extent--spearheading the search operations. I have a lot more confidence in the Aussie's ability to effectively manage and conduct a fruitful search and recovery operation as opposed to Malaysia's. At this point, if the weather doesn't run a muck in the search area we should probably hear some good news in the coming days. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^what kind of paper was the brochure on? Was it a 2 fold brochure, or more of a magazine style? |
Good news! The spot they've been looking this week where they have confirmed it went down.... well now Australia is shifting the search about 1100kms north following another 'credible lead' and are searching an area that is 319,000 square kilometres. Which is about 1/3rd the size of BC. Good luck mate. |
Quote:
Quote:
General Characteristics Primary function: High-altitude, long-endurance ISR Fuel Capacity: 17,300 pounds (7847 kilograms) Payload: 3,000 pounds (1,360 kilograms) Speed: 310 knots (357 mph) Range: 8,700 nautical miles Ceiling: 60,000 feet (18,288 meters) Crew (remote): Three (LRE pilot, MCE pilot, and sensor operator) (taken from US Air Force website) According to news 2 hours ago, the search site is now 1150 miles from Perth, making the round trip 2300 miles. To be safe, count 3500 miles, which allows for around 5200 miles worth of gas to search the area in circles. |
I think the only drone with that kind of range is the global hawk. I doubt they will devote a $100+ million drone for this kind of operation. Manned craft are more numerous and cheaper to operate. |
da fuq do i know, like 90% of people I'm an armchair SAR expert lol. |
Quote:
Boeing P-8 Poseidon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/mis...n-ocean-n63866 Also who knows it a country is using drones, I think they would keep that a secret. |
Canada has the same planes. We call them the aurora. Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Not that I can't appreciate the personal impact of this disaster, but I am so EFFFFFFFING sick of seeing this shit on CNN everyday. "New debris" "New theory" "New Expert" etc... anything they can do to keep the story on the front page since there is nothing more interesting to write about. Scumbag news outlets. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net