![]() |
Quote:
The full height of the building including antenna signifies a date in American history. Like, literally the beginning of Nation we call USA, today. Not a pissing match on who could build a higher tower. Is wikipedia failing you? Or is it that you've failed in Wikipedia'ing? I've personally been there and actually learned something while I was there on why it is the way it is and what the two holes in the ground that were turned into waterfalls represent. Everything that is a landmark in New York has some form of significant symbolism tied in with it and was done for a reason. |
Don't forget what is underneath WTC1 is a whole transport hub with subways etc, not to mention legacy systems. There is nothing as complicated underneath BK. |
Quote:
or more recently with the foreign worker program that was allowed to go on until the CBC broke the news (workers also had their passports seized and forced to live in apartments run by their employers for high fees) the same stories can be found in the states (but at least in canada these workers can get medical treatment) Quote:
so again you can't praise one and demonize the other...they're both bad |
Quote:
Would you compare sexual harassment of women in Western societies with the sickening oppression of women in Taliban Afghanistan or ISIS-controlled Syria? No? They're both bad. :bullshit: |
Quote:
Quote:
as for why its a topic of discussion...i don't know the OP brought it up :P |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OP implied it took 13 years to build this tower when in actuality it took closer to 8 years since construction started in 2006 after several delays in the planning and design process. In terms of NYC building projects however, this pales in comparison to the Second Avenue Subway, which has been in the works since the 1920s and has a tentative completion date of 2029! (construction started 2005) We can't really compare the building processes of a First World country with those of an emerging economy where there are lax labour laws, building code deficiencies and little to no respect for existing property rights. I mean how long is it taking to build our site C dam in the middle of nowhere without pissing off a slew of environmentalists and First Nations groups. Architecturally speaking, I don't think the round podium on which the antenna sits upon matches the sharp angles of the building itself. But overall, love the reflective glass facade, wish we had more buildings in a similar vein in Vancouver. We do have the new MNP tower on West Hastings St. coming up though which is a beaut. https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7558/...5fbc3dce_z.jpg |
StylinRed you need to shut the fuck up. All you ever do is blindly regurgitate your anti-captalist bullshit over and over. I get that offering some sort of contrarian opinion makes you feel superior but from the other side all we see is just some jackass that has NEVER produced anything of value in life. Your entire rant in this thread is so fucking uncalled for. I seriously don't know what the fuck goes on inside your head :fulloffuck: |
Quote:
Quote:
http://i1061.photobucket.com/albums/...psacc9cd23.jpg http://i1061.photobucket.com/albums/...ps54ab4db3.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sorry, I'm a little worked up here as well ... StylinRed's comment about the treatment of women in "western societies..." A ~ I noticed that you reference "western societies." You did so probably because by being vague it's more difficult for somebody to challenge your statement. Given that in the broadest sense "western societies" could include literally dozens of countries it genuinely invalidates your alleged fact. Further, because you are unable to identify those specific nation-states that you allege to treat women "just as bad or worse" than has the Taliban I strongly suspect it's because you have no actual factual information to support your claim. B ~ exactly which academic journals are providing you with this incredibly inaccurate information? Before you considered making the statement here, did you elect to first validate the references? C ~ please provide some tangible, first-hand experiences that provide evidence that "western societies" treat women "just as bad or worse" than Taliban-administered regions have historically. D ~ please provide a definition of exactly all of those countries that you identify as "western." Are you speaking in a geographic sense? Are you speaking about a collection of nation-states that share similar political frameworks? Using the term "western societies" is about as ignorant as using the term "first world country." |
How much do you not want to get in this building? |
Quote:
http://assets.vancitybuzz.com/wp-con...r-at-Night.png Structurally, supposed to be spectacular due to it's triangular footprint, that changes into a 4 sided tower. Architecturally, I don't really like it. But at the same time, I'm glad Vancouver is going to get something unorthodox. Vancouver House: This one?s big - The Globe and Mail |
That's a fucking cool looking building. The Vancouver skyline is pretty dull. |
:lol jimmies are rustled i'll PM you guys so as not to derail this further as the usual bunch seem to have the same issue regarding which has nothing to do with these 2 towers :D actually i'll just include it in here for the curious and spoiler it so as not to take up space but if you want to reply i encourage you to pm Spoiler! |
I'm going to leave the whole clash of civilizations conversation alone with StylinRed and try to stray back to topic (somewhat). Quote:
Compare Seattle's skyline http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--K-PylcejJ...line+1-700.jpg to ours: http://nathanz.files.wordpress.com/2...verskyline.jpg Now you tell me which one looks more "Boss" :hotbaby: |
Lol seattles skyline is gross. The space needle is so dated now, looks even worse in person |
Quote:
What will look dated (and already does IMO) are all the seafoam green condos lining False Creek. |
Quote:
Seattle only looks decent from one angle, maybe two. Just saiyan |
Will agree that the majority of Concorde pacific developments are rather uninspired |
Yes our mountains have many cities beat, but that's not really something we built 'amirite? Again, this is just a matter of opinion but our skyline "tabletops" a lot which I think is aesthetically less pleasing than other skylines that have buildings of varied height - although we've been gradually moving away from that with the Shangri-La and the Trump. But if the above two were built with more opaque glass and without the horrible protuding balconies I think they'd be even better. Again Seattle was just a point of comparison since they're in a geographically similar area, but there's no need to bash the place. I think Chicago has one of the best skylines on the continent and they manage to do it with a mix of residential and commercial towers: http://monkeywrenchplumbers.com/wp-c.../IMG_44852.jpg |
The MNP tower looks much better than the one from BIG but hopefully that will look better once completed (the ground floor buildings with the green roofs look great though) |
https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...90604477_o.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ht_Skyline.jpg http://acruisingcouple.com/wp-conten...ng-Skyline.jpg http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8095/8...154f0fbb_k.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8466/8...19bdba50_b.jpg let's NOT compare skylines. we can never compare to super cities. let's stick to single buildings. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net