| roastpuff | 01-12-2016 11:14 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pidish
(Post 8716242)
if the ram looked the way it did now in 2011, i'd have a Ram instead of the F150. at that time i thought the fx4 looked much nicer with the darkened headlights and taillights and the interior seemed to be a better fit for me.
edit: roastpuff, i forgot to add that it was little things with the interior of the f150 that won me over. if you go and sit in the f150 you'll notice that the b-pillars sit further back from where the drivers seat is in comparison to the ram. in the ram my shoulder would rub up against the b-pillar and it kinda drove me nuts. also, the flat floor in behind drivers/passenger seats is such a huge plus. theres tons of room for groceries and i've fit a 50" tv(still in the box) back there quite easily.
| Yeah, I notice the b-pillar thing when I'm doing shoulder checks - the F-150 is a bit easier to check your shoulder as the pillar isn't in the way. Luckily they don't rub my shoulders in my Ram so that's not bothering me. The flat floor of the F-150 is nice, for sure. Ram has a transmission hump so they have the fold-out flat floor, but it robs some of the height clearance. But man these trucks have a ton of cab room in a crew cab model!
I liked the Ram interior because it "felt" better - less hard plastics and more soft-touch materials that felt nicer, at least in the trim level (Sport) that I was looking at. Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hal0g0dv2
(Post 8716350)
| damn, you must floor it around everywhere eh? i kinda do and i'm getting 17.5L/100km with 35' tires lol
| I'm actually doing good around town considering that the place I live in is hilly and it's really short trips of a few km each way, is that in Vancouver traffic that you're getting that MPG? | 