Toronto man found not guilty of Twitter harassment - win for free speech ?One man?s vulgarity is another man?s lyric?: Toronto man found not guilty in Twitter harassment trial | National Post What a bullshit trial. It basically came down to a couple of feminists wackos talking shit about a guy and claiming that he didn't have the right to talk shit back because of safe spaces and whatever. |
|
Quote:
What a fucking waste of taxpayer's money bringing this case to trial. And the guy was barred from using the internet during the trial period (3 years) Does the crown and prosecutor has nothing better to do?! |
If she was so worried someone was tracking her movements, maybe she shouldn't be posting them on Twitter? |
wow, i'd sue for being barred from the internet for 3 years. that is cruel and unusual punishment ... man I wish those people would be on the hook to pay for all the money wasted. |
Quote:
he might be able to get a civil suit against his accuser, but even if he had a chance of winning i doubt if she has a enough money to be worth it. |
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZV0h-EXEAArHiq.jpg I hope that girl and other extreme feminists die. They are honestly pieces of shit. |
His case was helped by public funding in order to meet the demands of his lawyer. https://www.generosity.com/fundraisi...l-support-fund Lucky he made enough to defend himself against this sjw/femenist. |
Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn had enough influence to be heard by the UN to discuss online harassment the issue isn't going away just yet. UN Wants To Censor Internet To Save Feminists' Feelings It's scary to think that so many people fail to understand basic and fundamental concepts like free speech. There's tge concept of innocent until proven guilty which feminists and SJW's would like to throw out the window despite many prominent rape allegations ending up being false. Or how jurors in the Steven Avery murder case do not understand the concept of 'beyond reasonable doubt.' |
the crown prosecutor is a fucking joke. she deserves to be fired. instead of making $160K a year from taxpayers money. Seriously, she broke down crying when the trial wasn't going her way. on top of that this is what's what's taking up precious court time and money. shouldn't she be after real criminals? Quote:
|
|
the case is a bit insane and I feel really sorry for the guy...(can't use internet, got fired because of the case, 50k+ in legal fees and all the stress and lost time) Quote:
Some articles suggest the crown prosecutor and the feminist "victims" are friends and associates, so maybe that's why they were able to bring the case to trial. |
if they were friends. wouldn't that be more of an conflict of interest? Hence the cant use the internet . |
:facepalm: |
Quote:
if these 2 indeed defamed him and set out to ruin this guy, and there were no repercussions for their actions, i find this very disconcerting and sets a bad precedence. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net