I'd agree with this notion if it was reserved for individuals capable of understanding and making decisions for themselves. Children need protection from these idiots.

What about the naturopathic "doctor" that's involved in this? Is that quack being charged as well for not alerting proper authorities?

Are you implying that having autism is worse than being dead?

Except these stupid fucks then mingle with the general population, which include the people who can't take vaccines for a variety of reasons and who rely on herd immunity to protect them. If my kid can't bring peanut butter to school then someone elses kid shoudn't be allowed to bring preventable illnesses to school.

I think he used 'my wife and I' correctly thrice in that whole fucking novel ... And incorrectly about a thousand times. :rukidding:

Just like last year when all those people caught Measles from carriers of the disease.
Some of those that were infected were too young to get the vaccine.
From that one person who was infected, it ended up infecting people in half a dozen US states, Mexico and Canada.

Put the kids up for adoption and kill the parents with fire.

Charles In Charge, shut the fuck up and go troll somewhere else.

Instead of pounding your chest like an ape, when dont you put me in my place with science.

What happened to the Hepatitis specialist with the big words and aura of superiority with his vaccine knowledge?

Funny how no one thinks this might not of happened had the parents had more "trust" in the medical system. Do you think they enjoy paying out of pocket to go see an ND? Death by Western doctors/pharmaceuticals to ND's are still far greater regardless of what happened here.

Maybe they were religious and didn't believe in medicine and science

No amount of science will appease you though.... so what's the point? I guess the better question is what do you consider good science? Haha apparently I'm backward and indoctrinated so why would you want to engage me in conversation anyways, silly boy?

Millions upon millions of infants in Canada have received the Hepatitis B vaccine... why does an infant, whose brain and body is very vulnerable to vaccine adjuvants, need to receive this blood virus vaccine?

In short, literature strongly suggests that the particular HBV vaccine is an extremely safe option and the overall incidence of adverse effects relating to molecular adjuvants to be effectively zero. You can say what you want, but I'm not going to waste my time finding literature to support this only to have you question every article. This is a well known, critically accepted theory (and I'll say theory instead of fact just to play along).

They don't 'need to' receive the vaccine. It's not mandatory, just highly suggested and evidently highly used. It's simple - among those who weigh the pros and cons of a potential reaction to the vaccine and likely immunity to HBV vs a potential chronic HBV infection, the majority will choose the former.

If you're going to edit for grammar, at least spell grammar right.

A) I have a video for aluminum too... but generally B.C. administers Hepatitis B vaccines with mercury.
Mercury retards the brain as shown here in the U.S. Congress.

B) So they dont need the vaccine... now tell me why its recommended that every infant should receive the vaccine... because of transmission through cuts in a babies hand?

wait for it folks...

CiC, read this. There's a section written very logically, scientifically, and without bias about why newborns are vaccinated for Hep B when obviously they aren't having sex.

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org...-for-newborns/

That is a long read, my time is precious. You have a good understanding of the Queens English I presume so please simply tell me why an infant should recive this mercury\aluminum latent shot?

Eh. I tried, I concede.. Have better things to do, but it was entertaining while it lasted lol. Can't reason with those who don't want to reason

Last point.. I swear. Wrong: vaccines administered in Canada only contain aluminum as adjuvants. None contain mercury as you alluded to in your post. Again, there is a litany of longitudinal evidence spanning decades to reject your argument regarding aluminum use in vaccines.

Yes. Exactly. Transmission through cuts in a babies hands, or sexually, or IV drug use.. babies and children do turn into adults.. Risk is still higher than any unfounded effects from aluminum.

lolol at below. You're a funny guy. Did someone mention a joint mod account hahaha

Just because youre programmed to make peoples babies a little retarded, doesnt mean youre a bad person. Its okay, we understand the pressures of the rat race to keep your job and the back stabbing government we live in.

You have demonstrated time and again that your time is actually not very precious at all. You must have spent years bookmarking psycho youtube videos and fictive "articles", while not bothering reading things that don't agree with your nutjob views? Riight.

Also, why don't you use whatever brain you have left to do a little bit more research? Nobody is denying that mercury is toxic. But...Ethyl Mercury, which is what's used as preservatives in trace amounts in Hep. vaccinations do not accumulate in the body and clear. Looking that up took 3 minutes.

Lastly, that video is about mercury in fillings. I can find you a video of Sodium exploding in water and Chlorine gas killing people. You gonna stop eating salt now?

Do you eat fish Charles?

Funny. It took me less time to read the article than it did to watch the video.

Just sayin'.

What did you learn from it?

How do you know it doesnt fry the brain? Kind of talking out of your ass now arent we?

Nice edit, the more you write the further I can decimate your "dumb-ing down of Canadian children" programming.

First of all i remember reading a British Columbian government site mentioning the use of Mercury in Hep B shots. Verify your claim.

Second of all aluminum does retard the brain


Youre telling me that all babies should get the shot only because of transmission through cuts in their hands? What are the odds of this.

I thought Chuck had to keep his nonsense to a certain section of the forum? I know his bullshit draws in views which increases ad revenue and blah blah blah but it's pretty fucking irritating when interesting discussions get derailed and every second or third post is from that account.

it's a parent killing a child. nothing about that is natural selection. it's about the exact opposite of natural selection.

Reading CiC's comment gives me a headache.

Seriously, at least look up what is autism before making those comments. It's not something that can be "caused" postpartum. It's a neurodevelopmental disorder that's usually inherited (genetic) or environmental causes during pregnancy (second part is not definite, although research has found some correlations). This comes from my wife, who's a clinical psychologist/Ph.D. specializing in children with autism, so I'm fairly confident she knows a thing or two about it.

And even if you don't agree with vaccination, there's nothing stopping them to treat the kid when he became sick. Meningitis is not a terminal illness, there are effective treatment options. So why insist on not sending the kid to the hospital?

I find it ironic you ask me to verify my claims when yours are based on recollection. Verify your claim that a BC government website mentions the use of Mercury in HBV shots. It seems like all of your sources are unreliable YouTube videos.
In any case, Vaccine contents - Immunize Canada
Your point on thimerosol is covered well in the literature cited on that page. I can't help if you're unable to understand those sources.

Contents of immunizing agents available for use in Canada - Part 1 - General Guidelines - Canadian Immunization Guide - a government page listing all of the active immunizations used in BC and their contents. Note the "adjuvants" column.

You won't find those types of odds in literature.. I guess perhaps in YouTube videos you frequent. Due to standards on research methods, it is nearly impossible to collect reliable data to determine odds of transmission in infants i.e. a parent's recollection isn't good evidence. Vaccine effectiveness and justification is determined by prevalence. Hepatitis B Vaccine - Part 4 - Active Vaccines - Canadian Immunization Guide - Public Health Agency of Canada Refer to the section on epidemiology, and the prevalence graph.

I'm totally buying into your bullshit.. someone stop me.